we dont need muslims here
Muslims are welcome in the US as long as they obey US law. This is called freedom. It is what the US is all about. I'm not a Muslim. I'm not even religious. But Muslims have as much right to be here as anyone else.
we dont need muslims here
Terrorism is bad but counter-terrorism is worse!! The war on terror seems to have entered that stage. You kill one terrorist for the lives of 20 innocent civilians and thus contribute to making more enemies, more terrorists. Even those Muslims who are with the US begin to lose their 'sympathies' for it as they don't like its policies. Nobody is against the Americans or Europeans if there is any he is against the US policies.
No WMD were recovered from Iraq ...and Saddam was killed on other charges related to his killing of some insurgent kurds...this is historical fact and the future historian will write all t his.
Support of NATO doesn't mean the US is right...what about those many who are not allies of the US??? Read about League of Nations...Ironically UN is said to be the US itself!!
I think we need a review of the war on terror and restrict it to terrorists only....just going on attacking other countries where terrorists are hidden is not fair...the US is devastating country after country...and spending hell of a lot of tax money for no good gain..(terrorism has not slowed down ) and BTW where aren't terrorist hiding???
Putting an end to war on terror could mean no buyer for weaponry produced by rich nations...hence no money! No access to the Warm waters, to the resources of Central Asia etc!!
Mind it, man, politics has always been a dirty business!
back this 20 to 1 kill ratio please with documentation.You kill one terrorist for the lives of 20 innocent civilians and thus contribute to making more enemies, more terrorists.
No a terrorist is a terrorist because he want to be....you have stated that is was certain sects in the past correct?thus contribute to making more enemies, more terrorists
You have just stared the the American Muslim is nit in support of the war against terrorismEven those Muslims who are with the US begin to lose their 'sympathies' for it as they don't like its policies
Saddam played cat and mouse for years with the inspectors...additionally he was a barbarian to his own people ans also slaughtered many of his own citizens via genocide.No WMD were recovered from Iraq
Support of NATO doesn't mean the US is right...what about those many who are not allies of the US??? Read about League of Nations...Ironically UN is said to be the US itself!!
I think we need a review of the war on terror and restrict it to terrorists only....just going on attacking other countries where terrorists are hidden is not fair...the US is devastating country after country...and spending hell of a lot of tax money for no good gain..(terrorism has not slowed down ) and BTW where aren't terrorist hiding???
Putting an end to war on terror could mean no buyer for weaponry produced by rich nations...hence no money! No access to the Warm waters, to the resources of Central Asia etc!!
Mind it, man, politics has always been a dirty business!
The Man;1740498[QUOTE said:]One person swear four times....whew what a mountain of evidence
But wait...Why isnt the word of the woman and the man the same?
As said Uncool thats what it means...double punishment doesnt prevent a lie...people lie its a fact of life..as said its uncool to cut off the hand.
You now talk about appeals...in another thread you praised the speedy justice system where 2 people got thier heads cut off the other day and the inability for the accused to take more time....a few days is nothing to present a case..not even enough time for proper lab work:thumbdown
You have done well here you have proven my point 100 percent about muslims and culture clash..we dont need muslims here..next thing you know they vote or even get elected into office after running...they do not support our foundation for our way of life..simple.
This is also shown by KimmyC ..although I do not know her religion she is in support of sharia law I do know she has exposure by Muslims friends and studies arabic language.
We are now hitting 2 for 2 to support what I have been saying say no to sharia say no to muslims in america.
Now dont get me wrong If i go to your country I will respect your laws...In due respect you should respect mine and not try to change them...if one doesnt like the western ways then stay in the Middle east..if one supports sharia laws and does not like my laws they why come here.
Further....why all the interest in the west?...I find it odd.....How many people from the west trying to push the west on the east...very few...do we on the forums try to change the east...no its always the east hammering islam at us,,,its obvious
How many from the east pushing Islam on the west?..many...you will find it in several forums..Why..its odd IMO just the very interest itself.
Does anybody give a shit who are in high places in lets say Saudi Arabia...not here we dont.
But yet we have the east constantly pushing how right islam is on us...when it is shown of its barbarianism it is denied....why?
Why couldnt the response merely be you guys from the west are fucked up and are some major sinners......why is it the ways of the east are always downplayed regarding islam?
It always starts out the same....this and that is denied..when proven true...then there are"but you dont understand"...whats not to understand?..a dead body is dead a cut off hand is cut off..an unfair trial is unfair.
Jihad is Jihad.....
Not being able to take a cross or bible into a country is what it is....religious dictatorship.
:thumbupBut anyway thankyou again for proving my point as to my first few posts
Muslims are welcome in the US as long as they obey US law. This is called freedom. It is what the US is all about. I'm not a Muslim. I'm not even religious. But Muslims have as much right to be here as anyone else.
Muslims are welcome in the US as long as they obey US law. This is called freedom. It is what the US is all about. I'm not a Muslim. I'm not even religious. But Muslims have as much right to be here as anyone else.
back this 20 to 1 kill ratio please with documentation.
I have already posted a document on some forum here and I can't go and retrieve it for you if you had been reading my posts...
you may now google for the stats...sorry!
No a terrorist is a terrorist because he want to be....you have stated that is was certain sects in the past correct?
So how do we make one muslim practice one sect and switch to another?....rubbish.
You have just stared the the American Muslim is nit in support of the war against terrorism
Keep em coming:thumbup
I didn't say that...you are only misconstruing things.
Terrorism is a mafia present everywhere, to less or more extent. Frankly speaking terrorists are linked more to the Israel/Palestine cause than anything else...
Saddam played cat and mouse for years with the inspectors...additionally he was a barbarian to his own people ans also slaughtered many of his own citizens via genocide.
If the muslims support that they they can stay home.....here in the west we dont like barbarianism.....keep em coming:thumbup
Were your inspectors small kids??? What were they waiting for?? Why did they fail to report correctly??
not bullshit....you will one day say the same about Iran etc
Going in was done by many nations....we got sick of the shit it really is that simple..we been kicking ass since...if you guys cant handle your terrorists we will do it for you.
Wait....hmmm the taliban was in control of Afghanistan...thats right they were in full control.
The taliban are well known terrorists,,,fuck em fuck em real good o yeah...sick bastards.
Terrorist are mostly Arabs....from Saudia etc but the US had good relations with Saudia and dictators?? Amazing!
It's pushing 10 years and the war on terror doesn't seem to stop...why?? Are those handful of terrorist more strong than the super powers combined??? Is it going to take 100 years to end the war??
All I can say is Wow
Ugh!!
Oh and keep em coming:thumbup
a century wouldn't suffice to convince you or to change your outlook based on biased and sketchy info!!
You will only realize if you came to Afghanistan or Iraq...hhow about a visit??
yeah this is pretty much my stance on it too. Oh and they can't build one next to my housing tract, I'd hate the traffic
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...afghanistan-dead/story-e6frewp9-1225944889587
Obviously these people are uneducated enough to determine who's a terrorist and who is not.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...-defends-secrecy/story-e6freuyi-1225944954053
Here people go trying to cover it up.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...es-pentagon-says/story-e6frg6so-1225944325211
And even more so..
The "leaks" weren't even Top Secret.
One man swears only once....
swearing more than once is used in another context..
It's the same in all cases except business contracts...
All people are not educated as in the US or developed countries...nor women independent everywhere..so if one woman forgets, which she is naturally prone to (no offense meant to women!! the other is always therre to remind her!!
I am for cutting off hands of Habitual thieves....so??
It doesn't ake months or years to decide a case in Saudia or UAE....appeal is either Yes or No by the highest competent authority and it's done!! :thumbup:
By saying that you are sadly enough insulting your own Constitution...which guarantees freedom of religion and religious practice. Naturally if Muslim or Mormon population overtakes yours they will have the democratic right to make and enforce laws...what's wrong with that??
A fair talk is not acceptable to you...I see.
I leave it for Kimmy to respond to your unfortunate narrow mindedness...and tell you what religion she believes in!
Who the hell is not respecting your laws???? All Muslims do. If any Muslim doesn't do throw him to dogs, simple!!
Saudia doesn't accept other Muslims as citizens...they can only visit, work and then get lost!!
It's just your imagination. Muslims are found in every nick and corner of the world and they aren't fools. It is your inquisitiveness and poor knowledge of Islam that you think it bad and Muslims are forced to clarify wrong perceptions of the West (not the entire West as UK and many other EU countries as well as the US think tanks and rulers know and realize the significance of Islam in the world!)..Fortunately or unfortunately, the US is stuck up with its own Constitutional stipulates and unless you changed it....to the exclusion of democracy and secularism, to theocracy or autocracy the things will remain as they are....same goes with other secular democratic countries of the world which allow religious freedom and respect for minorities.
Well, if you do not understand or misperceive or misconstrue somebody has to correct you, doesn't he/she??
This means you need more research before commenting or citing any quotation in isolation!
I told you I haven't met any Muslim whose hands were cut off because of stealing....
Same as Crusade is Crusade
You are now talking against your own ;edict', viz when in Rome do as the Romans do'....Saudia and UAE are sultanates, kingdoms....and you can't dare defy a King unless you were fed up of your life!!
BTW you can travel to the ME with your Bible...and I think that shouldn;t be any problem. Aslo you can wear your cross there except the holy Cities of Muslims!
:thumbup
you have no case!!
We havent defined the context but thanks for showing other unfair practices of Islam also extend into civil matters:thumbupOne man swears only once....
swearing more than once is used in another context..
It's the same in all cases except business contracts...
All people are not educated as in the US or developed countries...nor women independent everywhere..so if one woman forgets, which she is naturally prone to (no offense meant to women!! the other is always therre to remind her!!
Who said habitual?..habitual is not a requirement...isnt it a foot that comes off for the second offense...but none the less I am not for amputation because someone says hey thats my lighter.:thumbdownI am for cutting off hands of Habitual thieves....so??
Days correct?....You have already shown your support of cutting off the 2 heads of the 2 guys in another thread..within a few days....wow it can take that long to find a lawyer.It doesn't ake months or years to decide a case in Saudia or UAE....appeal is either Yes or No by the highest competent authority and it's done!! :thumbup:
No I defended with freedom from religion.By saying that you are sadly enough insulting your own Constitution...which guarantees freedom of religion and religious practice. Naturally if Muslim or Mormon population overtakes yours they will have the democratic right to make and enforce laws...what's wrong with that??
I said i did not know her religion...but she is in support of shariaA fair talk is not acceptable to you...I see.
I leave it for Kimmy to respond to your unfortunate narrow mindedness...and tell you what religion she believes in!
My statement was I respect the laws of the nation I go to so people should do the same here rather than be in support of sharia.Who the hell is not respecting your laws???? All Muslims do. If any Muslim doesn't do throw him to dogs, simple!!
Saudia doesn't accept other Muslims as citizens...they can only visit, work and then get lost!!
Nope its a fact.It's just your imagination
Agreed and agreed.Muslims are found in every nick and corner of the world and they aren't fools
I know enough to fuck the game up...sucks to know someone with knowledge of islam doesnt it........its always the same a large group that knows nothing of Islam and pow undisputed posts by muslims.:eekIt is your inquisitiveness and poor knowledge of Islam that you think it bad and Muslims are forced to clarify wrong perceptions of the West
Pretty impressive considering the jibberish you have been posting the last few weeks...you now appear with /this entire post as a matter of a fact\ been forced to actually attempt to post a defense.(not the entire West as UK and many other EU countries as well as the US think tanks and rulers know and realize the significance of Islam in the world!)..Fortunately or unfortunately, the US is stuck up with its own Constitutional stipulates and unless you changed it....to the exclusion of democracy and secularism, to theocracy or autocracy the things will remain as they are....same goes with other secular democratic countries of the world which allow religious freedom and respect for minorities.
People dont have trials,thats a fact ..whether you met anyone that has had a hand cut off or not is a personal statement.Well, if you do not understand or misperceive or misconstrue somebody has to correct you, doesn't he/she??
This means you need more research before commenting or citing any quotation in isolation!
I told you I haven't met any Muslim whose hands were cut off because of stealing....
Crusade for peace is far from jihadSame as Crusade is Crusade
Did I mention rome?,,noYou are now talking against your own ;edict', viz when in Rome do as the Romans do'....Saudia and UAE are sultanates, kingdoms....and you can't dare defy a King unless you were fed up of your life!!
BTW you can travel to the ME with your Bible...and I think that shouldn;t be any problem. Aslo you can wear your cross there except the holy Cities of Muslims!
You were floggedyou have no case!!
civilian casualties are inevitable when the enemy doesnt follow the fucking Geneva conventions
The Man;1740590[QUOTE said:]We havent defined the context but thanks for showing other unfair practices of Islam also extend into civil matters:thumbup
You forgot to mention cases of bias testimony of spouse cheating etc...you know the stuff that gets you killed...or sex before marriage...you know the stuff that gets you killed...homosexuality
Its not the same...it also may not be the same for business contract as well anyway thanks.
Who said habitual?..habitual is not a requirement...isnt it a foot that comes off for the second offense...but none the less I am not for amputation because someone says hey thats my lighter.:thumbdown
Days correct?....You have already shown your support of cutting off the 2 heads of the 2 guys in another thread..within a few days....wow it can take that long to find a lawyer.
You guys heard of lab work,finger prints,depositions,lawyers,judges,District attorneys.jurrors
Its a fucked up society when someone can say you did something and thats it...fuck sharia.its not good its like old testament shit:thumbdown
world is again reverting to religion and spirituality....most people are sick and tired of this mundane western life!No I defended with freedom from religion.
Why interested in my constitution when you are fully supportive of sharia?...... AHHHH yes the teaching of the loop holes we have.
I said i did not know her religion...but she is in support of sharia
My statement was I respect the laws of the nation I go to so people should do the same here rather than be in support of sharia.
Nope its a fact.
Agreed and agreed.
I know enough to fuck the game up...sucks to know someone with knowledge of islam doesnt it........its always the same a large group that knows nothing of Islam and pow undisputed posts by muslims.:eek
Pretty impressive considering the jibberish you have been posting the last few weeks...you now appear with /this entire post as a matter of a fact\ been forced to actually attempt to post a defense.
So are there 2 different people using the member ID or have you been using jibberish in the past to avoid the toms of questions people ask you?
People dont have trials,thats a fact ..whether you met anyone that has had a hand cut off or not is a personal statement.
Crusade for peace is far from jihad
Did I mention rome?,,no
I used saudi as an example..no crosses no bible etc...no Christianity.....so much for religious tolerance....it is fair to say they reject it totally.....so if so taboo why come to be surrounded by Christians?
You were flogged
I don't follow any religion, I am agnostic.
I support Shariah law do I now? Put words in my mouth, please, I like it...not...
No offense (The Man) but all you are doing is rebutting everyone, and interpreting the things everyone says to fit everything you want to prove. If you want to debate properly, why don't you just accept that not all evidence is going to support whatever you believe? I don't think you're understanding a lot of what people have said. People have contradicted you, yet you take this as supporting you, and you are interpreting things the wrong way.
I'm sorry, but you really need to see that, you're coming across as....well, stuck up =/
Remember that you're not infallible.
And doubting something is not debating properly either. If you want some data, here you go:
Are you going to tell me now some thing that makes it support whatever you are trying to prove?
In the link I provided, it shows that there are more attacks by other groups more than Islamic extremists. Clearly Islamic terrorism is exaggerated. You're all fearing for your lives over nothing when you have other groups attacking you and you don't care.
If you want to uphold the values of your country and live by its Constitution well it's time to start acting like it.
By you...clearly in support of sharia law below from several posts backI support Shariah law do I now? Put words in my mouth, please, I like it...not..
If they wanna chop off hands, I don't care, it's a good deterrent. I know I will never steal, regardless of whether I live here or lived there, so what am I to worry about?
Do you propose I let false statements go uncontested?No offense (The Man) but all you are doing is rebutting everyone,
are you doubting facts of documentation?...I have not seen any of my links rebutted with documentation,but rather only persona opinionIf you want to debate properly, why don't you just accept that not all evidence is going to support whatever you believe?
Incorrect posts were made to strengthen my position regarding culture clash and sharia lawI don't think you're understanding a lot of what people have said. People have contradicted you, yet you take this as supporting you, and you are interpreting things the wrong way.
Not at all no offense taken...its called attack of the messenger rather that a rebuttalI'm sorry, but you really need to see that, you're coming across as....well, stuck up =/
Remember that you're not infallible.
Your link contains an unfriendly script and I wont be clicking it again I have purposely omitted itAre you going to tell me now some thing that makes it support whatever you are trying to prove?
In the link I provided, it shows that there are more attacks by other groups more than Islamic extremists. Clearly Islamic terrorism is exaggerated. You're all fearing for your lives over nothing when you have other groups attacking you and you don't care.
12 July 2010 at 11:46 GMT
Afghanistan: civilian casualties 'on the rise'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10598764
Civilian Casualties in Afghanistan: Beyond the Body Count
Wednesday 11 August 2010
http://www.truth-out.org/civilian-casualties-afghanistan-reach-all-time-high62222
Violence has soared across Afghanistan in recent months, with 212 civilians killed during June alone, Afghanistan Rights Monitor says.
Most of the deaths documented by the report were caused by insurgents, the report notes, with the widespread use of roadside bombs particularly deadly, killing almost 300 civilians.
Suicide bombs were also a major cause of death, the organisation said.
Taliban and insurgent groups were responsible for 76 percent of the civilians killed this year, most of them victims of roadside and suicide bombs known as improvised explosive device (IED) attacks. The WikiLeaks War Dairy of thousands of classified military documents reveal that IED attacks against coalition forces and civilians increased from 308 in 2004 in to 7,155 in 2009. These crude attacks intimidate an already scarred populace.
And the second one again...In all 210 civilians had died in the past six months as a result of Nato-led strikes, shootings and raids, the report said.
"Dozens of people, including women and children, were shot dead during violent and barbaric intrusions, raids into houses and other counter-insurgency operations by US-Nato forces," the report's authors say.
I can't believe you just dismissed all of that. You can't just look for evidence that confirms everything you're trying to prove. Clearly there was much more there that contradicts with what you say more than what supports you....allegations that coalition governments have attempted to cover up recent civilian massacres.
....Mohamed Ahmadzai lives in a remote area of the Sangin district in Afghanistan's Helmand province. He recently told independent reporters how he was forced to bury two daughters, his sister and wife among extended family members after a rocket fired by coalition forces hit a soft target: a house full of woman and children who had fled to a nearby village to avoid a firefight between the Taliban and coalition troops.
....Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai initially condemned the attacks and reported that Afghan officials confirmed that the rocket attack killed 52 civilians. Coalition sources originally denied that any civilians had been killed in the attack and promised an investigation.
...The UN reports that, in 2010, a majority of the civilian casualties caused by coalition forces were the result of air strikes, with 69 deaths and 45 injuries caused by bombings before July. Up to 32 civilians died in a single coalition air strike last week.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...afghanistan-dead/story-e6frewp9-1225944889587
Obviously these people are uneducated enough to determine who's a terrorist and who is not.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...-defends-secrecy/story-e6freuyi-1225944954053
Here people go trying to cover it up.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...es-pentagon-says/story-e6frg6so-1225944325211
And even more so..
Australian soldiers made a payment of US$10,200 to compensate for the lives of six civilians five of them children accidentally killed in a night raid just north of the base in Tarin Kowt on February 12 last year.
Some of the leaked documents show that coalition forces handed over terror suspects to Iraqi security services even after abuse was suspected, or continued with interrogations despite visible injuries to suspects. There has been no clear mention of MI6 involvement in the logs, however.
WikiLeaks argues the release of the documents has shed light on the wars, including alleged widespread torture by Iraqi forces and reports that suggested 15,000 additional civilian deaths in the Iraq conflict.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.