KimmyCharmeleon
Well-Known Member
So by that token we should just not prosecute someone who does an arrned robbery and shoots the clerks as the cost of incarceration for the next 50 years will be to high?
Afganistan was under the taliban control ...you reflect the influence of heroin control upon this.
Your position on such throughout your paragraph shows support for the taliban.....you are aware they are muslims that live strictly by the faith and are considered terrorist by the majority of nations
As far as 911 being the only attack...false..it was the attack that broke the camels back.
The US did not start this war on terror alone it was global effort that had dozens of nations involved...troops from many nations went in.
No one is generalizing here ..but at the same time we can see that there is a problem with terrorists..I have shown that your country has kept many muslims out of your country.
The long list can hardly be described as a few..but rather large in fact.
No one went into any country and just started shooting people..the goal was to take out saddam and the taliban{which you seem to have some support for}.
The global effort is for everyone..especially the people in these nations..to stop them from living under the stupid rule of executions and hand chopping etc.
Propoganda?
Not at all
People get killed by terrorists everyday...the world is sick of it and rightly so/
The problem is they were growing in size...they are not a fad..but a problem that began to grow in large numbers daily
No, the people don't die from terrorism. The people die from this whole war in general. Your country wants to take control of the Middle East's resources, put them into debt and make them pay it all back. Leaving civilians with what? When money goes to debt, the people get nothing.
Not to mention the armies who are in these countries. I'm pretty sure they're the ones doing the killing. 92% of the people killed from war are civilians. Go figure.
And, you don't have to keep mentioning hand chopping. I think it's obvious from previous discussions in here that hand chopping isn't stated in the Qur'an, no?
Plus, websites are pretty questionable. It's better to go by the book itself in this case.
I really think you are lacking insight to what I have to say. You haven't shown how my country has kept Muslims out. You gave me a list of groups that aren't allowed here, but who has actually tried to come here and get rejected? Maybe those groups haven't actually tried coming here. I don't know, I read one of the groups. To me one read something like it was about the 'oneness of God', wow that sounds so scary! Not.
Muslims aren't trying to bring any of their crap here, most of them are happy to assimilate to our Western cultures because it's better than their home countries which got screwed over by the Western country itself. Wow, isn't that a little harsh to create havoc in someone's country and then reject them from seeking refuge?
I don't think you know enough about Islam to be able to make judgments of its people. Having learnt about it myself, I respect their religion for what it is, because just looking at their principles and way of life, it is so much more level-headed than ours. As maz says, they are forbidden to talk badly about other religions. And now look at us, talking shit about them...shooting at them...
I don't know why you think Muslims want to bring their own law here. Yeah they support it, doesn't mean they want to take it everywhere.
And, I think you're ignoring base rate information. The fact that a Muslim himself has spoken out for the rest of the them says a lot more than some Westerner giving a mere list of websites where you haven't explained anything for yourself, and who seems to be under the impression that EVERY Muslim is a terrorist. A Western interpretation of something Islamic won't prove anything unless it came from the Qur'an itself. I think you're just trying to find ONLY evidence that supports the whole 'hand chopping' thing. You know, those websites could be wrong too. It's sad to think that such a misinterpretation happens on a large scale. Just like the whole of the West think that Muslims are terrorists, my-oh-my
I think it's pretty valid to say that if you came from that culture, you probably know it best. Who are we to judge them? And why do we have to be so culturally insensitive? Who are we to label them as terrorists when we don't even come from that culture/religion in the first place?!