What is the point of hating our troops?

[Peter Parka]

I think you're misunderstanding what they mean by the definition.

They are talking about discrimination in the social setting. Where a person is actively denied something due to their physical or personal attributes. No one is denying anyone anything by having lewd signs.

Prove it!

 

[All Else Failed]

...I just did by reading the definition.

 

[Peter Parka]

...I just did by reading the definition.

No, you said your interpretation of it, that dosen't prove a thing.

 

[Tim]

People have freedoms in this country and I'm very thankful for that. But you are forgetting one very important thing when it comes to free speech... Your freedom of speech ends once you infringe on someone else's freedoms...
You cannot incite a riot with your free speech, you cannot cause harm by your free speech (ordering someone to harm you) you cannot take my freedoms away with your free speech.... and I would argue that although these freaks are entitled to their hate speech, they are not entitled to do it at the funerals of the fallen soldiers. I would insist that they were far enough away as to not disrupt the proceedings. Because their right to free speech does not allow them to take away others rights..........

 

[All Else Failed]

No, you said your interpretation of it, that dosen't prove a thing.

Can you prove that it means what you think it means?

 

[All Else Failed]

People have freedoms in this country and I'm very thankful for that. But you are forgetting one very important thing when it comes to free speech... Your freedom of speech ends once you infringe on someone else's freedoms...
You cannot incite a riot with your free speech, you cannot cause harm by your free speech (ordering someone to harm you) you cannot take my freedoms away with your free speech.... and I would argue that although these freaks are entitled to their hate speech, they are not entitled to do it at the funerals of the fallen soldiers. I would insist that they were far enough away as to not disrupt the proceedings. Because their right to free speech does not allow them to take away others rights..........

I think there should be somehting in place to have them at a certain distance, but I don't see what rights these protesters are depraving the funeral goers of?

 

[Peter Parka]

Can you prove that it means what you think it means?

That was just the literal sense of that definition. In case you didn't know, the dictionary is very literal.

 

[All Else Failed]

That was just the literal sense of that definition. In case you didn't know, the dictionary is very literal.

The dictionary can also be very vague and wrong on definitions.

 

[Peter Parka]

I think there should be somehting in place to have them at a certain distance, but I don't see what rights these protesters are depraving the funeral goers of?

You honestly don't believe that anyone should have the right to grieve in peace then??? But you do believe that people should be able to incite hatred wherever they please? You have some very strange priorities!!!

 

[Peter Parka]

The dictionary can also be very vague and wrong on definitions.

Well I'm one of the many people who believe the dictionary over what AEF thinks, sorry you can't understand that!:smiley24:

 

[Mrs Behavin]

I think there should be somehting in place to have them at a certain distance, but I don't see what rights these protesters are depraving the funeral goers of?

Are you freakin serious? :mad

 

[All Else Failed]

You honestly don't believe that anyone should have the right to grieve in peace then??? But you do believe that people should be able to incite hatred wherever they please? You have some very strange priorities!!!

I think they should be left in peace, but there's really no legal "right" for that to happen, that I am aware of anyways. Like I said, there should be somehting in place for the protesters to be a good distance away from the funeral.

 

[All Else Failed]

Are you freakin serious? :mad

"rights" in the legal sense.

 

[All Else Failed]

Well I'm one of the many people who believe the dictionary over what AEF thinks, sorry you can't understand that!:smiley24:

You're misinterpreting what the definition even said in the first place.

 

[Peter Parka]

You're misinterpreting what the definition even said in the first place.

No you THINK I did. You are not right about everything AEF. Just because you said something, it dosen't mean it's right, sorry you can't grasp that.

 

[All Else Failed]

No you THINK I did. You are not right about everything AEF. Just because you said something, it dosen't mean it's right, sorry you can't grasp that.

I know I'm not right about everything. its just that I don't think you really got what I was trying to say about it.

 

[Peter Parka]

I know I'm not right about everything. its just that I don't think you really got what I was trying to say about it.

I got what you were trying to say and I disagreed with it, why do you keep going on and on about the same point if someone disagrees with you? I think you're wrong and repeating it over and over again won't change that, deal with it!

 

[All Else Failed]

w/e..

 

[Tim]

"freedom of speech" guaranteed in the Constitution means freedom from goverment persecution. It does not guarantee freedom from the consequences of your actions.

 

[All Else Failed]

"freedom of speech" guaranteed in the Constitution means freedom from goverment persecution. It does not guarantee freedom from the consequences of your actions.

Well yeah. If the want to scream about fags at a funeral and they get stomped on thats their fault. Although I wouldn't agree with any violence towards any party.