Martin/Zimmerman-----Poll

[Tim]

Assuming he followed him.

You keep saying this... I just don't understand how you think Zimmerman got to where he was...

Did Martin drag his ass from the SUV and down between the buildings before smashing his head in?

Of course Zimmerman followed him, he even said so on the 911 call


You can't even stick with the known facts, can you?

 

[The Man]

Lets say he followed him John if it makes you feel better

would that give martin the right to try and kill the watchman?
Simple yes or no will suffice.

Is it to difficult a question for you John?

I have asked this several times John why is it so difficult to answer?

 

[Kakapo Dundee]

If there is something you disagree with point it out

You've already been pulled up on it more than once, by various debaters. Your repeated assertions that the teenager was 'smashing' or 'slamming' the vigilante's head against the pavement are not consistent with the evidence surrounding the superficial wounds to the head.

 

[The Man]

You keep saying this... I just don't understand how you think Zimmerman got to where he was...

Did Martin drag his ass from the SUV and down between the buildings before smashing his head in?

Of course Zimmerman followed him, he even said so on the 911 call


You can't even stick with the known facts, can you?

There is nothing to show that he followed him after he hung up the phone

Lets say he followed him Tim if it makes you feel better...and I will agree with it for the question below.

Would that give martin the right to try and kill the watchman?
Simple yes or no will suffice

 

[Kakapo Dundee]

Assuming he followed him.
Does that give martin the right to smash his head?

Flip the coin over, if you are prepared to accept that it has two sides. You're walking home, minding your own business, and you see a suspicious-looking guy get out of a SUV. There's been a spate of burglaries in the area......

 

[The Man]

You've already been pulled up on it more than once, by various debaters. Your repeated assertions that the teenager was 'smashing' or 'slamming' the vigilante's head against the pavement are not consistent with the evidence surrounding the superficial wounds to the head.

I suppose his head was split open from being smashed in the grass.
Jesus Christ he had his head smashed into the sidewalk...anyone suggesting otherwise is merely trying to be difficult

 

[Kakapo Dundee]

What part of superficial wounds are you choosing to ignore?

 

[The Man]

Flip the coin over, if you are prepared to accept that it has two sides. You're walking home, minding your own business, and you see a suspicious-looking guy get out of a SUV. There's been a spate of burglaries in the area......

I guess I would smash anyones head that gets out of an SUV and goes the same way I do. :umno
Think about what your are saying it is a large housing unit...people walking the same direction as you is going to be common.

 

[The Man]

What part of superficial wounds are you choosing to ignore?

What part of head smashing do you not understand
Are you that dense?

 

[Kakapo Dundee]

So why is it that you insist that it is Zimmerman's right to assume that the kid was up to no good, but the notion that Zimmerman might be behaving suspiciously is dismissed as illogical?

If people walking around is 'common', what possessed Zimmerman to follow this kid?

 

[Kakapo Dundee]

What part of head smashing do you not understand
Are you that dense?

I don't understand why you are using the term repeatedly when the evidence doesn't support it.

 

[Johnfromokc]

You've already been pulled up on it more than once, by various debaters. Your repeated assertions that the teenager was 'smashing' or 'slamming' the vigilante's head against the pavement are not consistent with the evidence surrounding the superficial wounds to the head.

As I predicted - the Zimmerbigots ignored all compelling evidence and go right back to engaging in their asshattery. It's Larry, Curly and Moe-Ron - right out of shithouse law school. They're good for a laugh at least.

 

[The Man]

So why is it that you insist that it is Zimmerman's right to assume that the kid was up to no good, but the notion that Zimmerman might be behaving suspiciously is dismissed as illogical?

If people walking around is 'common', what possessed Zimmerman to follow this kid?

Even if he thought Zimmerman was behaving suspiciously that doesn't give him the right to smash his head

 

[The Man]

I don't understand why you are using the term repeatedly when the evidence doesn't support it.

Multiple gashes and red areas between the gashes that are not blood......equals multiple.
Is that beyond your ability of logical deductions.

 

[Kakapo Dundee]

You've missed the point again. 'repeatedly' refers to your repeated assertions of slamming / smashing that are inconsistent with the physical evidence that required no treatment at the scene.

 

[The Man]

As I predicted - the Zimmerbigots ignored all compelling evidence and go right back to engaging in their asshattery. It's Larry, Curly and Moe-Ron - right out of shithouse law school. They're good for a laugh at least.

You cant even answer an easy question...what does that say about you John.
Since you dodge it repeatably and still post your garbage that Martin was in the right and george wasnt.
I will answer it for you...correct me if I am wrong.

If George followed Martin ...that gives martin the right to smash Zimmermans head into the sidewalk....your argument is yes.
John thinks that gives martin the right to smash the watchmans head into the sidewalk

 

[Kakapo Dundee]

Even if he thought Zimmerman was behaving suspiciously that doesn't give him the right to smash his head

But if he'd shot Zimmerman, that would have been acceptable, I guess.......

 

[clancy]

If Zimmerman had attacked him and smashed his head into the sidewalk....sure.

 

[The Man]

You've missed the point again. 'repeatedly' refers to your repeated assertions of slamming / smashing that are inconsistent with the physical evidence that required no treatment at the scene.

Multiple gashes...means repeated....are you really that dense?
The paramedics tended to him at the scene then he went in for questioning.
It was to late to get stitches the next day ...thus they were butterflied together.
But really are you that dense?
Look at the pictures...you can see the blood..you can see the gashes.
Seriously....you are starting to look like nothing more than a troll here.

 

[clancy]

You cant even answer an easy question...what does that say about you John.
Since you dodge it repeatably and still post your garbage that Martin was in the right and george wasnt.
I will answer it for you...correct me if I am wrong.

If George followed Martin ...that gives martin the right to smash Zimmermans head into the sidewalk....your argument is yes.
John thinks that gives martin the right to smash the watchmans head into the sidewalk

It's no surprise some people will side with the attacker. Zimmerman was doing what neighborhood watch people do. They observe and report, especially in a neighborhood that had seen several crimes in a year and someone is lurking around who fits the description of the ones who committed the past crimes. Martin had no right to attack Zimmerman. Martin probably wanted something to brag about on the Twitter account he had. I read some of his tweets. Martin was no innocent little child.