How far is too far?

Users who are viewing this thread

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Weak. There is no "MIGHT" about it. Why don't you look up the numbers, and then tell us again how it's no more dangerous than straight sex.
No you think that just because gays have a higher number infected with HIV/AIDS that it immediately makes it more dangerous, thats flawed logic.
 
  • 303
    Replies
  • 6K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

KLD1019

Active Member
Messages
1,962
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I agree. Im not going to force religion on my son. I dont go to church but i believe. Ive been but dont go regularly. Some people think thats wrong but who are they do judge!? My dad, who im not close to and is full force catholic (im baptist), bothered to call me one day and preach to me about not going to church and i told him to not critisize me about it and he just kept on and on about 'well Jesus was critisized.....yadda yadda' i hung up on him!
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Why have you got a thing about this anyway?

You know what, ... This takes me totally by surprise. I've spent days in this thread trying to stave off people telling me I'm some supposed homophobe, and right when I FINALLY think it's sinking in, this comes up? Dude... I haven't got ANYTHING on about this. We're talking about it because you wanted to.

No you think that just because gays have a higher number infected with HIV/AIDS that it immediately makes it more dangerous, thats flawed logic.

How is it any different than data saying that smokers have a higher rate of lung cancer? Do you HAVE to smoke to get lung cancer? Nope. Does it increase your chances by 800%? Yep. Does that make it more imminently dangerous? ... Yep.

This is political correctness run amok.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
You know what, ... This takes me totally by surprise. I've spent days in this thread trying to stave off people telling me I'm some supposed homophobe, and right when I FINALLY think it's sinking in, this comes up? Dude... I haven't got ANYTHING on about this. We're talking about it because you wanted to.



How is it any different than data saying that smokers have a higher rate of lung cancer? Do you HAVE to smoke to get lung cancer? Nope. Does it increase your chances by 800%? Yep. Does that make it more imminently dangerous? ... Yep.

This is political correctness run amok.

This has nothing to do with political correctness.

Just because homosexuals have a higher rate of HIV/AIDS really doesn't mean a gay person automatically leads a more dangerous life than a heterosexual. If the gay person uses the proper safety procedures when having sex with his/her partner theres really no more of a risk than a hetero couple having sex.
 

BadBoy@TheWheel

DT3's Twinkie
Messages
20,999
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.06z
I know I said earlier I would not post in here anymore...But frankly I am waiting to find Intruder and AEF in the throws of passion if this keeps up...:ninja:ninja:24::24:

Sorry:24:
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
This has nothing to do with political correctness.

Just because homosexuals have a higher rate of HIV/AIDS really doesn't mean a gay person automatically leads a more dangerous life than a heterosexual. If the gay person uses the proper safety procedures when having sex with his/her partner theres really no more of a risk than a hetero couple having sex.

Okay then. You're right. Gay people just SUCK at using protection. Good call. They're all simply irresponsible idiots. That's much less offensive. :smiley24:

I don't understand your military jargon. :p

LOL That's not military. Must be a California thing. That is SoCal High School speak for "Dude, I'm broke but wish I had smokes of which I see you are currently enjoying. Would you please offer me one without me having to ask you nicely and sound un-cool? Thanks." :cool
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
ah snap. I didn't know you smoked. I'd offer you one, but I don't think I could throw it 2000+ miles. :p

That would be a bit much to ask I suppose. Damned if it wouldn't be a cool trick though!! :D

I actually quit a several months ago. Some days I miss it more than others though. :(

Today would have been a great day for a ninja smoke though. :ninja
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Okay then. You're right. Gay people just SUCK at using protection. Good call. They're all simply irresponsible idiots. That's much less offensive. :smiley24:



LOL That's not military. Must be a California thing. That is SoCal High School speak for "Dude, I'm broke but wish I had smokes of which I see you are currently enjoying. Would you please offer me one without me having to ask you nicely and sound un-cool? Thanks." :cool
No....its a higher rate in homosexuals because it effected them earlier when it first came about. It would have been the same for heteros if it hit their population in a significant way early on. If you are a gay person, and you are just as careful as a straight person, your life style is just as dangerous as any other person's that practices safe sex and has knowledge of their partner's sexual history.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Would I be wrong and jumping to conclusions if I just straight out called homophobe here?:wtf: I ask, because I dont want to jump to conclusions unjustly so correct me if I'm wrong but I cant help feeling there is this going on!:confused
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
So you think any non-monogamous person has an equal chance of contracting HIV? Gay or straight?

Where did you hear that if you don't mind my asking?
 
78,875Threads
2,185,391Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top