Johnfromokc
Active Member
I am a very firm believer in micro evolution. It's macro that I have issues with.
Is "macro" not the accumulation of "micro"?
I am a very firm believer in micro evolution. It's macro that I have issues with.
Here's a quote I posted earlier from Hitler himself. He obviously didn't believe in God
Is "macro" not the accumulation of "micro"?
Although one does wonder why a god would use evolution to create.
How about in future posts you use the quote button so it is easier to identify who you are quoting? Thanks!
Why can't God be nature itself?
Perhaps this isn't a fact, but something I just happen to believe... Although humans may be the most intelligent animal on the planet (or at least we have ordained ourselves as such), I'm certain that there are things in this universe that we can't even come close to comprehending or understanding. Kind of like your pet dog trying to comprehend a two hour drive in the car.
After that... I am basically guided by my own morality. I strive to be a good person because that's who I am.
The first part - it sounds like you're suggesting that nature itself could be playing the part that people believe a God does, punishing and creating and so on. Is that what you were aiming at? Or do you mean less of a sentient force, but still with some purpose?
I do however believe that you reap what you sow.
Why can't God be nature itself?
"Human being" is a label.
I agree with you labels are just descriptions of who/what you are. But belief in God is just one part of being religious. The proper label for simple belief in God is theist. Religious describes an institutionalized system of beliefs and practices. So all religious people are theists but not all theists are religious. Sadie is a theist but I can also see her as non-religious because she doesn't practice Christianity in the sense of going to church, tithing, regular bible reading, etc.
No no, I agree. Some labels are bad because of what they imply, and like you say sometimes they have prejudice behind them. However, I don't think saying someone is religious because they believe in God could be considered wrong - it's a fairly neutral description.
You may not think so but I do!
Sadie, I understand why you think the word religious is wrong. However, whatever your personal interpretation of the word is, the common definition of the word religious is neutral - 'an individual who believes in a higher power or deity'.
You say that you understand why I would think of the word 'religious' as wrong, well I don't, I just don't like it for me.....Labels suck...end of story!
You don't seriously think that when anyone uses the phrase religious, they mean it to imply all kinds of nasty, derogatory things? I'm not saying people never do that, but in the context of this thread using the term religious is just to show whether someone has belief in a higher power or not. I don't see how that limits you in any way.
I had never thought about it quite like this, but I am a bit with sadie on this. I would not want the label religious either. The story runs a bit long so I won't get into all of it.... John. Joe and I know each other quite well. As one can see, John and Joe are on opposite ends of this for the most part. I fall in the middle. My belief in God is a very simplistic. I have a biology degree. I have spent a lot of time working with cadavers. I do not for one second believe that the human body could have "evolved" entirely on its own. The way all the systems work together, how perfect it all is... After that... I am basically guided by my own morality. I strive to be a good person because that's who I am. Not because someone or some book tells me to. If I were to label myself... it would be more spiritual than religious, but I don't care for labels either.
Mr. John? LOL...I think you might have confused me with Joe-the-meek (a friend of mine BTW) that addressed you as "Miss Sexiesadie." I'm just plain old John and I truly love to have fun and enjoy life.
I understand where you are coming from, and we do agree that no one knows what happens to our awareness, or "aliveness" when we die. And no doubt we will all die, and I am completely comfortable with the concept of death and hold no fear of it whatsoever.
Oh my! I never intended to categorize you as a Bible thumper. Please forgive me if I came across that way. I enjoy respectful discourse on the subject of religion and the concept of god because it has touched all of our lives in both good ways and terrible ways. The only person I'll poke in the eye from time to time is Joe, but that's because we have been poking each other over a variety of subjects for a few years now.
Thank you SS, and ditto.
You are very welcome. And you are probably right about the HIS part, because no woman would create a world of death, disease, famine, war and violence between HER own children.
God didn't create all of this honey, WE did, when are we going to take some responsibility for our own stupidity?
I say this sincerely - I wish women ruled the world - that would end war, and I say this a formerly indoctrinated member of the USMC school of thought.
He didn't say he didn't believe in God in any of the quotes you posted. His problem seemed to be with institutionalized Christianity. You also have a problem with the church. Does that mean you don't believe in God? I'm not saying he did believe in God but he claimed to and you can't tell otherwise from the quotes you posted.
Hitler would not be the first atheist to pretend to be a theist in order to manipulate the gullible. But, as far as I know, Hitler never admitted to being an atheist. If we take him at his word then he believed in God.
I think that's true to the extent that obviously if you're a nice person, other people will treat you well, whereas if you're an asshole then you have to get used to others being equally nasty in return.
However, in the grander scheme of things, attitude only seems to affect how individuals respond to you. Good people still get sick and die, or are in horrible accidents, or lose the people they love, etc etc, and people who are far less pleasant still prosper and live long lives.
I've read the bible from cover to cover........see how well you know me?
You and I have this in common. I've read it through twice and studied it quite a bit as an adult. My mother had each book of the Bible in individual hardback editions, and one of the hardbacks was blood red with gold lettered "HELL", lol. I got quite the biblical home schooling. I've attended more bible studies than I can count. The more I studied, the less it made sense to the point I became a confirmed Agnostic Atheist.
I've onlly read it through once, but it sits as we speak in my night table drawer. Once in a while, when I need it, I take it out and open it to some random page....somehow,no matter what page I land on, it never ceases to make me feel good. I've had the same bible since I was a child, it's worn and torn and a lot of the pages are turned down or loosely attached....and I'll never part with it for all the fancy new bibles in the world.
I'm glad we have something in common.
We probably have a lot in common. Do you still attend church? Out of curiosity, what version of the Bible is yours? Growing up, it was always the King James version, but eventually the Southern Baptist Convention changed to the NIV. I came to prefer the NIV. It was the KJV without all the "thee's and thou's".
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.