The organization he heads aided and abetted criminals with his consent. Well he deserves his day in court to prove that/defend himself, hence the need to be arrested first.
The Pope's Visit To Britain
- Thread starter Peter Parka
- Start date
The organization he heads aided and abetted criminals with his consent. Well he deserves his day in court to prove that/defend himself, hence the need to be arrested first.
--------------> :thumbup
Well he's only been here less than a day and has has already kicked off with his crap. The hypocritical cunt has been comparing atheists to Nazi's. I guess the former Hitler Youth member should know all about Nazi ideology.
I tried to give you rep, but the board said I needed to spread it around a bit before giving you more.
God, please intervene.
Oh I see you can prove that the Pope was involved with that? Also, according UN law, you can't arrest a head of state...or it maybe the Geneva convention. But even if you could, can you prove that was involved? If you can't, why arrest him and not the priests and bishops involved?
I apologize if I've offended your Catholic sensibilities, but proof is not required, only compelling evidence which is in abundance for anyone with a neutral outlook. Put it in front of a Grand Jury. You've got 30+ years of pedophile priests being shuffled around to offend again. How could this have possibly happened without the consent of the hierarchy? It's not just in the U.S., it was in Europe too. It's all there except to see, just open your eyes.
The fact that he is a Head of State has nothing to do with the moral legitimacy of my statements. Sure Hitler was a head of state too, but still a criminal. If your position is that Heads of State are immune from answering to crimes, I guess your ok with that. I'm not. I have no agenda with the Catholic church except for wholesale condoning of crimes against children. It's reprehensible, heinous, disgusting, and damnable.
Last edited by a moderator:
It always makes me laugh the irony of someone who believes in the Bible requiring proof off someone of something they dont like.
You can't arrest someone on some whim of an accusations, you obviously need proof, and no you haven't offended me, you are only making yourself look silly :thumbup
There are all kinds of reports of him having his hand in the cookie jar so to speak with regard to knowledge about these sicko pedophile priests.
Here is one story
http://www.examiner.com/humanist-in-portland/religion-pope-protected-wisconsin-pedophile-priest
You can find plenty more by seaching......> "did the pope have knowledge of the pedophile priests"
You seem to be blindly defending him in the face of a lot of evidence showing he was complicit in the cover up. And you will probably find there are a few dozen others in hierarchy that also knew and covered up a despicable pattern of abuse by priests:thumbdown
You do make me laugh.
The pope is almost certainly guilty of something. Now it is either obstruction of justice, or gross negligence.
You choose.
The is the first time a Pope has gone to Britain as the Head of State
One can make a compelling argument why that is so this time. The interesting thing is that the UN does not consider him the Head of State. Britain however does treat him as Head of State so he is immune from prosecution etc.
I believe the moral center of my position is well regarded by millions. You don't need proof, only compelling evidence, which exists in abundance.
:nod::nod::nod:
i am told that
35,000 showed up / 6 million Catholics in the UK = .005%
seems he is real popular NOT
correction 70,000 still not a great showing
correction 70,000 still not a great showing
Last edited by a moderator:
You are accusing with just straws, you don't have anything in abundance
I guess you have been reading too much of the newspapers, they can speculate what they like, I don't think you or the media will come up with proof :thumbup
One unelected leader inviting over another unelected leader and tax payers pick up the tab. Got to be something wrong for this to be going on in this day and age.
Sorry, but the Pope is elected
How many Catholics do you know who were given the opportunity to vote for him? Sorry but a couple of hundred old priests voting on who should be the leader of a religion of over a billion people dosen't exactly sound very democratic.