Republican Judgement

Users who are viewing this thread

Johnfromokc

Active Member
Messages
3,226
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I already told you that I'll get around to answering that question if and when I feel like it. Please, continue with your temper tantrum though, it's quite entertaining. You're nothing more than a liberal-bot parrot.

Taking all bets right now from anyone interested. Retro will dance and squawk and never answer the question. Any takers?

Run along and learn some new words now lil fella. :p
 
  • 2K
    Replies
  • 29K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
:24:

Your condescending aura of superiority rears it's ugly head once again. Note, I never actually even said that I was going to respond. That all being said, the premise of your question is misleading. You can't mention x, y, and z in situation A as a way to ask why there are differing reactions to x changing in situation B. Your premise is flawed at its core, with y and z merely being added to the equation to distract from the flawed premise in an attempt to manipulate any response that doesn't fit with what you want to hear. In essence, you've pretty much just loaded the dice in your favor.
 

Johnfromokc

Active Member
Messages
3,226
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
:24:

Your condescending aura of superiority rears it's ugly head once again. Note, I never actually even said that I was going to respond. That all being said, the premise of your question is misleading. You can't mention x, y, and z in situation A as a way to ask why there are differing reactions to x changing in situation B. Your premise is flawed at its core, with y and z merely being added to the equation to distract from the flawed premise in an attempt to manipulate any response that doesn't fit with what you want to hear.

You just wrote a whole paragraph and said absolutely nothing of substance. Typical.

Can't answer this one either huh? I do understand. I used to be a bot just like you, except I actually tried to find the data to back up that kind of thought process. When I couldn't, I accepted I was wrong, and set about in an earnest quest to learn everything I could, and began continually challenging my own beliefs.

You should try that approach instead of the silliness you just posted. But I know you will not. You'll get another dose of Limbaugh and Hannity and Boortz, or the local right wing parrot on the way to and from work and go right back to making statements with no numbers to back up your claims.

People like you just work at wearing logical people down with mass volumes of bullshit, and little substance until they throw up their hands and give up and walk away. Then you start all over repeating the same disproven concepts. I'll give you bots credit for persistence even if you lack substance.
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I tore the logic of your "argument" apart and exposed it for what it really was. But, that's bullshit in your estimation because it's someone daring to disagree with you. You're also incapable of either reading or comprehending... I listen to local talk radio, not national talk radio. But thanks for playing, and further proving what a joke you are.
 

Tim

Having way too much fun
Valued Contributor
Messages
13,518
Reaction score
43
Tokenz
111.11z
All classes pay the bills for most businesses. That's the point of an economy based on capitalism... you create a product that people are willing to pay for, and you make money from selling it. Some businesses make lots of money off of the middle class, other businesses make lots of money off of the "rich", and still others make their money from all classes.

Actually that has nothing to do with capitalism. As a matter of fact, most small business never engage in capitalism at all. My company sells about $4 million a year in millwork and casework to the hospitals and universities in Philly, capitalism doesn't play into it at all.
 

Johnfromokc

Active Member
Messages
3,226
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I tore the logic of your "argument" apart and exposed it for what it really was. But, that's bullshit in your estimation because it's someone daring to disagree with you. You're also incapable of either reading or comprehending... I listen to local talk radio, not national talk radio. But thanks for playing, and further proving what a joke you are.

Saying you did what you did not do is still a lie. I've been waiting page after page for some numbers from you, but, alas, nada. You're a sad little bot. Run along now.

Y'all should just start reading WhatReallyHappened.com and find new stuff to argue/debate over ;):D:cool:ninja

You're right Moon. But it's really entertaining watching these guys get refuted time after time and seeing them come right back, claim a faux victory and repeat their position that hard numbers refuted. They're like the energizer bunnies of bullshit. :p
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Saying you did what you did not do is still a lie. I've been waiting page after page for some numbers from you, but, alas, nada. You're a sad little bot. Run along now.

I don't need numbers to prove that an argument has severe logical flaws. Pretty simple concept.
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
:wtf_anim: You must have been one of those kids who played in the soccer leagues that didn't keep score. :laughat: :p:rofl2:

Here you go... I'll re-quote it for you. Your condescending behavior does nothing but remove from what little credibility you had left. Like accountable said, you have no interest in discourse, you're simply trying to beat people into submission.

Total bullshit response, ignoring the primary topic:

Answer the question Retro:

Why can Australia have universal health care, 4 weeks paid vacation, $15 per hour minimum wage, and 4.9% unemployment, but if the U.S. trys to raise the minimum wage from $7.25 to $8.25, the useful idiots on the right come out and predict economic disaster.

Why Retro? Why?

Answer the qusetion. Don't dodge and parrot.

That all being said, the premise of your question is misleading. You can't mention x, y, and z in situation A as a way to ask why there are differing reactions to x changing in situation B. Your premise is flawed at its core, with y and z merely being added to the equation to distract from the flawed premise in an attempt to manipulate any response that doesn't fit with what you want to hear. In essence, you've pretty much just loaded the dice in your favor.

Your question was flawed at its core, and therefore unworthy of response in it's current form. If you want to re-phrase it in a fashion that doesn't surround it with items that do nothing but attempt to distract people with unrelated information.
 

Johnfromokc

Active Member
Messages
3,226
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Your question was flawed at its core, and therefore unworthy of response in it's current form. If you want to re-phrase it in a fashion that doesn't surround it with items that do nothing but attempt to distract people with unrelated information.

It's a perfectly logical, simple question. You need to either answer it or move on. I'm starting to feel sorry for you because of how ludicrous you are making yourself look with each post.
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
We'll just have to let this lie.

They're no different from the Dems, partisan. You're just unwilling to see it. Please don't belittle yourself by playing the apologist now.

What? I'm not apologizing for anything. You can be partisan for the wealthy or you can be partisan for everyone. I see that Republicans are bad for average citizens and Dems while far from perfect, don't spend all of their time knifing them (average citizens).

0d707_Eric-Cantor.jpg


Eric Cantor on Morning Joe today:
We need to get our fiscal house in order so jobs will be created.

Translation:
After we have screwed the Middle Class and given the Rich a pass, you can find a minimum wage job and scrape by for the rest of your miserable lives, supporting the truly important people of society and you'd better be happy or else.
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
It's a perfectly logical, simple question. You need to either answer it or move on. I'm starting to feel sorry for you because of how ludicrous you are making yourself look with each post.

No, it is a completely flawed question. You are asking why x, y, and z in situation A are treated responded to differently than x in situation B. If you don't understand the logical flaw in that question, then I don't know what else to tell you. You've stacked the question in favor of either getting a response that you want, or giving yourself a built-in bully pulpit if you don't get the response that you want. If this were a trial, your question would be objected to on grounds of relevance, or it being a leading question and more than likely be sustained.

If you'd like to rephrase it and compare apples to apples, I submit that people might actually be willing to answer it.

As has been said, you're not interested in an actual discussion. You want to bully people into agreeing with you, and you can't handle actual disagreements with either your suppositions, or the way that they are presented. Your response to disagreements is to attack and belittle, which takes away from what legitimacy you had gained.
 

Johnfromokc

Active Member
Messages
3,226
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
If you'd like to rephrase it and compare apples to apples, I submit that people might actually be willing to answer it.

The energizer bullshit bunny keeps going and going and going and going...........................

Why can Australia provide it's people with universal health care, a $15 per hour minimum wage, 4 weeks paid vacation with a vacation premium pay, and have a 4.9% unemployment rate but America can't seem to pull it off?

Simple economic question. Can't make it any simpler than that. Australians tend to not vote against their own best interests and their country hardly felt a bump while we are STILL suffering from this so-called "Great Recession" and increasing wage disparity and skyrocketing debt.

Tell me retro, how can those Socialist bastards down under do that while we can't?
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Very good, you're learning. Perhaps there may still be some hope for you after all. You're still comparing apples and oranges, but the question isn't nearly as flawed as the way you asked it previously.
 

Johnfromokc

Active Member
Messages
3,226
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Very good, you're learning. Perhaps there may still be some hope for you after all. You're still comparing apples and oranges, but the question isn't nearly as flawed as the way you asked it previously.

OMG! I have the partial approval of Hannity Jr. :p

You still have not answered, and you won't because you can't. I stand in awe of your ability to attempt to baffle people with bullshit. It's not working, but you're giving it one hell of an effort. Ever consider GOP politics? Anyone with the talent to bullshit and outright lie when presented with a simple question like you would be a natural.

Look, I know you are trying to save face here because you have had your ass handed to you. When you come back in the morning and read all the dodging and dancing you have done, you might see what an ass you are making of yourself a little clearer. That is unless your cranial rectumitus is so severe as to have impared your vision.

You could have spent all this bullshitting time researching and coming up with some type of documentation to support your convoluted politcal ideas. Perhaps you did, and came up with nothing, hence the never ending stream of verlbal nothingness you continue to post.

I'm done for the evening. Try and leave me something challenging for tomorrow will ya?
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top