$15./hr minimum wage?
CAMMIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can we move in? Not that she'll see this comment in this thread.
$15./hr minimum wage?
CAMMIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can we move in? Not that she'll see this comment in this thread.
Apologist:a person who makes a defense in speech or writing of a belief, idea, etc.What? I'm not apologizing for anything.
Obviously minimum wage anywhere is called minimum for a reason. It's intended to be the least a person can make to barely scrape by with cost of living and taxes considered.
In Australia, the base wage is refered to as a living wage, not a minimum wage. A living wage maintains a decent standard of living and provides economic stability for working people.
In Australia, the base wage is refered to as a living wage, not a minimum wage. A living wage maintains a decent standard of living and provides economic stability for working people.
Ah thanks, so it's not exactly the trap retro is making it out to be? lol :surrender
Which is why they're two completely different concepts... like I told John, apples and oranges.
Actually, my point is that John is making comparisons between two completely different things while trying to make them out to be equal. While I wasn't aware that the minimum wage in Australia was a living wage, it didn't anything but actual bolster my argument. :24:
I've been trying for days to have an adult conversation with you, Accountable and Alien Allen. Each one of you ignore the tough questions, use words like ad hominem, strawmen, and non sequitur while engaging in the same.If you'd like to have a discussion like an adult, I'm sure we'd all welcome it. But up until now, your behavior shows quite the opposite.
Nah, that's not the question. Before you can ask that, you have to ask if it would implode economically.In Australia, the minimum wage is as John has said $15.00/hr....actually $15.51. It is their minimum wage but it is a living wage. So, I guess in the US, the concept of a minimum wage vs a living wage is an apples to oranges comparison whereas in Australia, it is an apples to apples comparison. The question is how is it that Australia can provide it's workers with minimum wage that is a living wage, national healthcare, vacation premium w/4 weeks vacation and maintain a 4.9% unemployment rate as well as a stable economy but the US, the richest nation on the planet, would implode economically if it did the same?
In Australia, the minimum wage is as John has said $15.00/hr....actually $15.51. It is their minimum wage but it is a living wage. So, I guess in the US, the concept of a minimum wage vs a living wage is an apples to oranges comparison whereas in Australia, it is an apples to apples comparison. The question is how is it that Australia can provide it's workers with minimum wage that is a living wage, national healthcare, vacation premium w/4 weeks vacation and maintain a 4.9% unemployment rate as well as a stable economy but the US, the richest nation on the planet, would implode economically if it did the same?
Nah, that's not the question. Before you can ask that, you have to ask if it would implode economically.
What are the other variable expenditures of their Goverment? How many billions in aid to foreign countries do they provide? What is their tax structure?
Do you think that minimum wage, healthcare and unemployment rates are the only variables needed to compare the two economies?
Nah, that's not the question. Before you can ask that, you have to ask if it would implode economically.In Australia, the minimum wage is as John has said $15.00/hr....actually $15.51. It is their minimum wage but it is a living wage. So, I guess in the US, the concept of a minimum wage vs a living wage is an apples to oranges comparison whereas in Australia, it is an apples to apples comparison. The question is how is it that Australia can provide it's workers with minimum wage that is a living wage, national healthcare, vacation premium w/4 weeks vacation and maintain a 4.9% unemployment rate as well as a stable economy but the US, the richest nation on the planet, would implode economically if it did the same?
Really? So you believe that our economy would implode if it offered all those things? Lessee YOUR numbers.Actually, it IS the question. Why can't you guys just answer it? If you don't believe it will work, let's see your numbers.
This.
Like I said Johnnyboy, you're comparing apples and oranges.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.