Religious Inconsistencies

Users who are viewing this thread

Tuffdisc

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,024
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
15.13z
599601_410518738999281_752837011_n.jpg

What the hell are you on about here? So its ok to murder people? Do you want others to take the freedom of people you love? Without rules or laws, there is no freedom. If there were no laws, people would run amok doing what they like to whoever. Forget hell on earth or Armageddon, just imagine if we could do what we like without rules and laws? Murder, rape, child abuse and others, is that what you want?
 
  • 549
    Replies
  • 6K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Tim

Having way too much fun
Valued Contributor
Messages
13,518
Reaction score
43
Tokenz
111.11z
Oh I could, but you atheists don't quite get it do you :D

No, it's either you do or you don't. This isn't freaking rocket science here. Even a fundie like you should be able to grasp the concept presented in only a few short sentences, even if you don't agree with it.
 

Tim

Having way too much fun
Valued Contributor
Messages
13,518
Reaction score
43
Tokenz
111.11z
Oh I could, but you atheists don't quite get it do you :D

And one more thing for you to consider...

“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.”– Stephen F. Roberts
 

Stone

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
54
Tokenz
0.00z
And one more thing for you to consider...

“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.”– Stephen F. Roberts



"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. "
Rather obvious.
It's an argument that begins with fallacious reasoning and supposedly derives a 'shared' conclusion ......
"When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours. "
.....that potentially satisfies everyone while conflicting at the same time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mercury

Active Member
Messages
1,586
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z

Tim

Having way too much fun
Valued Contributor
Messages
13,518
Reaction score
43
Tokenz
111.11z
"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. "
Rather obvious.
It's an argument that begins with fallacious reasoning and supposedly derives a 'shared' conclusion ......
"When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours. "
.....that potentially satisfies everyone while conflicting at the same time.

Why do you feel the need to dissect everything and analyze the shit out of it?

This is a quote to get one thinking, it isn't presented as an absolute truth or scientific fact. Of course you aren't an atheist if you are a Christian. Even though the first Christians were considered atheists by the Romans for not worshiping the Pagan deities. But it's to get one thinking about the reason why they don't believe in the thousands of gods that are not their Christian god.

This was a profound question for me when I was questioning why I was a christian and it's still a relevant question today. It's a very scary question to contemplate for those who are of faith, at least those who seriously ask themselves the question.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top