Springsteen
Number 2, Rafael!
I meant in terms of sacking him would cost them that much, but sure him leaving for another club (which as you say Juve seems the most likely destination) would mean nothing accrued in terms of funds owed to Rafa.
As for Gerrard, there is an expectation that he'll turn it on in every game, certainly moreso from Liverpool fans, and I honestly believe the main reason is because they don't have that many players who can rescue them from difficult situations and turn on the style etc. I would say we have Rooney, Nani, Giggs and Scholes (to a point). Chelsea have the Lampards, Drogba's, Anelka's, Malouda's etc. Arsenal have Fabregas, Van Persie (case in point being the Tottenham game, sure they lost but they played a lot better when he came on), Nasri and Walcott.
But look at Liverpool's options without Gerrard/Torres - Lucas? Not going to inspire a good display. Mascherano? Good player but again not inspirational. Babel is in and out. Ngog is crap. Kuyt is ok but not a top class player. Aquliani could be but is injury ravaged at the moment.
Hell I'd even go as far as to say teams like Tottenham and Man City have better squads than Liverpool at this point in time because of the quality. I mean Spurs have Modric who is a classy player, Defoe, Crouch, Pavlyuchenko and Gudjohnsen are good strikers who pose threats, Bale's good at getting forward, Huddlestone and Palacios are up there with the top CM pairings in the Country and Gomes is much improved in goal.
City have Bellamy, Tevez, Adebayor up front who will always get goals. Adam Johnson etc in midfield who threaten and Nigel De Jong works hard in the midfield. So yeah in terms of squad depth I think they are better than Liverpool.
As for Gerrard, there is an expectation that he'll turn it on in every game, certainly moreso from Liverpool fans, and I honestly believe the main reason is because they don't have that many players who can rescue them from difficult situations and turn on the style etc. I would say we have Rooney, Nani, Giggs and Scholes (to a point). Chelsea have the Lampards, Drogba's, Anelka's, Malouda's etc. Arsenal have Fabregas, Van Persie (case in point being the Tottenham game, sure they lost but they played a lot better when he came on), Nasri and Walcott.
But look at Liverpool's options without Gerrard/Torres - Lucas? Not going to inspire a good display. Mascherano? Good player but again not inspirational. Babel is in and out. Ngog is crap. Kuyt is ok but not a top class player. Aquliani could be but is injury ravaged at the moment.
Hell I'd even go as far as to say teams like Tottenham and Man City have better squads than Liverpool at this point in time because of the quality. I mean Spurs have Modric who is a classy player, Defoe, Crouch, Pavlyuchenko and Gudjohnsen are good strikers who pose threats, Bale's good at getting forward, Huddlestone and Palacios are up there with the top CM pairings in the Country and Gomes is much improved in goal.
City have Bellamy, Tevez, Adebayor up front who will always get goals. Adam Johnson etc in midfield who threaten and Nigel De Jong works hard in the midfield. So yeah in terms of squad depth I think they are better than Liverpool.