Patriots In Exile Club

Users who are viewing this thread

BadBoy@TheWheel

DT3's Twinkie
Messages
20,999
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.06z
No it actually makes perfect sense. A quarter of all revenue generated by Pfizer comes from the sales of Lipitor. The patent on Lipitor runs out in 2011 then the generics will hit the market at a much lower cost. Pfizer has very little in the pipeline for new drugs and has not been successful in buying up start-up biotech companies with promising drug research. So Pfizer turned to its own industry and decided that Weyeth has a number of potential drugs in the early and later stages of the approval process to justify its purchase. So you have the No. 2 drug company buying out the No. 11 company. Anti-trust problem? Under a traditional anti-trust anaylsis the answer is a clear no but....................
From a layoff standpoint, it makes sense to layoff the 3000 at Pfizer because they will be replaced by the 3000 at Weyth who have the knowledge of the new drugs being developed. You can expect more layoffs in the future as the result of redunacies in positions within each company.


Yeah....Typical....It has nothing to do with excessive mis-management

You act like they are th only company that generates revenue based on patents, I'm saying it's posturing to maximize the money they begged the government for.

I can already hear he phonecalls

"Hey.....We asked Obama for a couple of billion"

"Well shit.....we're going to need to lay some folks off..........I mean we have to absorb the 65 billion dollar buyout"

"Dang it.....why didn't I think of that"
 
  • 879
    Replies
  • 14K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Hoffa

New Member
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Republican Party ran by a wacko radio talk show host ? If the future Republican party is going to be lead by Palins , fix-it men and Talk radio blowhards then the future is bleak for the Republicans . Exile is where Republicans will stay. >f



Limbaugh Cracks the Whip, and Republicans Get in Line



"The minority whip appears to be someone who has never won an election."
------------------------
And Republicans apparently still fear the host. Just ask Georgia Rep. Phil Gingrey, whom Politico.com quoted Tuesday defending his party's leaders in light of Limbaugh's comments.
"It's easy if you're Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh or even sometimes Newt Gingrich to stand back and throw bricks," Gingrey said. "But when it comes to true leadership, not that these people couldn't be or wouldn't be good leaders, they're not in that position of John Boehner or Mitch McConnell."
The next day, after apparently hearing an earful from constituents, Gingrey issued a mea culpa on his government Web site.
"I have actively opposed every bailout ... I see eye-to-eye with Rush Limbaugh. Regardless of what yesterday's headline may have read, I never told Rush to back off," Gingrey wrote.
"Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Newt Gingrich, and other conservative giants are the voices of the conservative movement's conscience."
Limbaugh, who offered his own stimulus proposal in a Wall Street Journal editorial on Thursday, accepted Gingrey's apology.


Limbaugh Cracks the Whip, and Republicans Get in Line - First 100 Days of Presidency - Politics FOXNews.com
 

BadBoy@TheWheel

DT3's Twinkie
Messages
20,999
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.06z
Republican Party ran by a wacko radio talk show host ? If the future Republican party is going to be lead by Palins , fix-it men and Talk radio blowhards then the future is bleak for the Republicans . Exile is where Republicans will stay. >f



Limbaugh Cracks the Whip, and Republicans Get in Line



"The minority whip appears to be someone who has never won an election."
------------------------
And Republicans apparently still fear the host. Just ask Georgia Rep. Phil Gingrey, whom Politico.com quoted Tuesday defending his party's leaders in light of Limbaugh's comments.
"It's easy if you're Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh or even sometimes Newt Gingrich to stand back and throw bricks," Gingrey said. "But when it comes to true leadership, not that these people couldn't be or wouldn't be good leaders, they're not in that position of John Boehner or Mitch McConnell."
The next day, after apparently hearing an earful from constituents, Gingrey issued a mea culpa on his government Web site.
"I have actively opposed every bailout ... I see eye-to-eye with Rush Limbaugh. Regardless of what yesterday's headline may have read, I never told Rush to back off," Gingrey wrote.
"Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Newt Gingrich, and other conservative giants are the voices of the conservative movement's conscience."
Limbaugh, who offered his own stimulus proposal in a Wall Street Journal editorial on Thursday, accepted Gingrey's apology.


Limbaugh Cracks the Whip, and Republicans Get in Line - First 100 Days of Presidency - Politics FOXNews.com

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, but I hate that fat, oxcontin popping weasel...He's not the leader of my party by any stretch of the imagination. And only has a job because people have lost the ability to have an original thought on their own.
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
You know that deal in CA where CA wants to set its own standards? Look at this crap that is part of it.

Where do these asshats come up with this shit :willy_nilly:

What a fucking joke


Compromise likely in Obama's fuel rule push

BY MARK PHELAN • FREE PRESS AUTO CRITIC • February 1, 2009

While most people see President Barack Obama's order telling the Environmental Protection Agency to reconsider its decision that banned California's tougher greenhouse-gas emissions as a victory for environmentalists, I think it's more likely to lead to a compromise that California and the automakers could live with.
adlabel_horz.gif


The California standard calls for automakers to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the vehicles they sell in the state 30% by 2016. Lower CO2 emissions are directly proportional to reduced consumption of gasoline, so automakers calculate the rule effectively requires an average fuel economy of 26.7 m.p.g. for pickups and SUVs and 43.2 m.p.g. for cars.

That's higher average fuel economy than the tiny plastic-bodied Smart Fortwo city car gets. The only car currently sold in the United States that would meet the standard is the Toyota Prius hybrid. On the truck side, only the Ford Escape and Mercury Mariner hybrid SUVs pass muster. Challenging, you say, but fair. All the automakers will have to play by the same rules, after all. Except they don't. Only automakers that sell lots of vehicles -- 60,000 a year or more -- in California have to meet that toughest standard.
Those that sell fewer -- luxury brands, fringe players and the new brands that will inevitably come from China and India -- get a pass. Automakers that sell fewer than 4,000 vehicles a year in California never have to hit 43.2 m.p.g. Those that sell fewer than 60,000 get years longer to meet that standard.

The large automakers -- who won't talk about this on the record, because they're negotiating -- hate this. They say the only way they can hit those targets that soon is by greatly limiting the sales of their most-popular vehicles in California.



Except that, like water finding its own level, supply always finds a way to meet demand.
"People will drive to the next state," says Rebecca Lindland, analyst with IHS Global Insight. "It will be great business for non-California car dealerships, and the vehicles there will cost less because there's more supply and they don't have all the expensive technology you need to meet the California standard."
California tried to address that by saying no resident can bring a new car with fewer than 7,500 miles on it into the state. Nice try, but that just means the next growth business in Nevada will be building rolling dynamometers next door to the dealership to put 7,501 low-wear miles on a brand-new vehicle in a few days.

"Really bad things happen when you mess with the free market," says Joe Phillippi, principal of AutoTrends Consulting. "People will figure out a way around this." The rule was unfair and unworkable, but it deadlocked the conversation every time automakers and environmentalists met. By putting it back on the table, Obama forces the sides to compromise. California regulators must come up with a plan their citizens will tolerate, and automakers will have to dig deep and commit to the highest fuel economy they can achieve.

Contact MARK PHELAN at phelan@freepress.com or 313-222-6731.
adlabel_horz.gif
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, but I hate that fat, oxcontin popping weasel...He's not the leader of my party by any stretch of the imagination. And only has a job because people have lost the ability to have an original thought on their own.

The point is pretty obvious. If these type of marginal personalities have such sway in the Republican Party then it's in trouble.

Question about your signature and not trying to start a fight but when did having your state execute more people than any other be a reason to clap? At one point in time Texas also had the most people locked up doing hard time for Mary Jane possession, lives royally screwed up by minor drug use, something that should be treated as a medical problem instead of a law enforcement issue. Is that also worth a good round of applause?
 

SgtSpike

Active Member
Messages
807
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
You know that deal in CA where CA wants to set its own standards? Look at this crap that is part of it.

Where do these asshats come up with this shit :willy_nilly:

What a fucking joke


adlabel_horz.gif
I'm not surprised, considering the idiot liberals at the head of it.
 

Strauss

Active Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I can't believe they damn near made it through. How long ago was it that people were practically tarred and feathered for not reporting their nanny's income?

That was Judge Kimba Woods, as I recall, who sits on the bench in the Southern District of New York.
 

Strauss

Active Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Nope, Zoe Baird, Clinton administration.

The Lessons Of Nannygate - TIME

eta: oops. Kimba Woods was part of that.

It would appear we both are correct:

Judge Wood was Bill Clinton's second unsuccessful nominee for attorney general in 1993. Like Clinton's previous nominee, Zoe Baird, Wood had hired an undocumented immigrant as a nanny; although, unlike Baird, she had paid the required taxes on the employee and had broken no laws (Wood employed the undocumented immigrant at a time when it was legal to do so), the threat of a repetition of the same controversy ultimately led to a withdrawal of the nomination. Janet Reno was later nominated and confirmed for the post.

Kimba Wood - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
Something to ponder. Got this in an email this morning. Is this not the same govt which Obama says is the only thing that can get us out of this recession. If is was not so sickening it might be funny. I would like to see somebody actually defend this boondoggle. The same goes with Homeland Security. The list goes on.




Absolutely the funniest joke ever......ON US !!!
  • Let it sink in.
  • Quietly we go like Sheep to slaughter.







Does anybody out there have any memory of the reason given for the establishment of the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ..... during the Carter Administration?



  • Anybody?
  • Anything?
  • No?
  • Didn't think so !

Bottom line . . we've spent several hundred billion dollars in support of an agency ...
the reason for which not one person who reads this can remember.



Ready???????



  • It was very simple
  • ... and at the time everybody
    thought it very appropriate.


The Department of Energy was instituted 8-04-1977

TO LESSEN OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN OIL.

Hey, pretty efficient, huh?????



AND NOW IT'S 2008, 31 YEARS LATER ... AND THE BUDGET FOR THIS

NECESSARY DEPARTMENT IS AT $24.2 BILLION A YEAR


    • THEY HAVE 16,000 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AND APPROXIMATELY 100,000 CONTRACT EMPLOYEES
    • AND LOOK AT THE JOB THEY HAVE DONE!

      THIS IS WHERE YOU SLAP YOUR FOREHEAD AND SAY 'WHAT WAS I THINKING?'

    • Ah yes, good ole bureaucracy.
And NOW we are going to turn the Banking System & the Auto Industry over to them?
 
78,878Threads
2,185,399Messages
4,961Members
Back
Top