Will Bain be the Bane of Mitt?

[Accountable]

People who have issues with color tend to align themselves with the GOP, regardless if they are really in the club or not.

People objectively reading your posts might be tempted to point out the elephant in your room.

 

[Alien Allen]

People who have issues with color tend to align themselves with the GOP, regardless if they are really in the club or not.

exchange white for black and GOP for Dem and there ya have it also

I will give credit to the left for their con game though. The blacks for some crazy reason think they are better off with liberal policies which have failed them for 50 years.

God I love this country

 

[Minor Axis]

I loved Chris Matthews description of Romney's favorite method of "redistribution" on tonight's Hard Ball :

Paraphrased: Take over a company, screw the workers, flip it, load it with debt, remove a giant chunk of cash for himself (and Bain), then walk away a richer man.

 

[Alien Allen]

You make it like Bain raped every company they took over

Tell ya what. I will take their success rate to the clowns in DC when it comes to supporting industries.

You conveniently forget how many companies Bain saved.

But lets not let those pesky facts get in the way of a good spin

 

[Tim]

You make it like Bain raped every company they took over

Tell ya what. I will take their success rate to the clowns in DC when it comes to supporting industries.

You conveniently forget how many companies Bain saved.

But lets not let those pesky facts get in the way of a good spin

So how many companies did they predate and how many have they saved?

You are talking like you know, so you must already have the answer.

 

[Alien Allen]

So how many companies did they predate and how many have they saved?

You are talking like you know, so you must already have the answer.

Nope you can do the research

Just like you did with regard to why Ford did not need a bailout.

Let me know how that works for ya

 

[Tim]

You make it like Bain raped every company they took over

Tell ya what. I will take their success rate to the clowns in DC when it comes to supporting industries.

You conveniently forget how many companies Bain saved.

But lets not let those pesky facts get in the way of a good spin

Nope you can do the research

Just like you did with regard to why Ford did not need a bailout.

Let me know how that works for ya

So you give MA a hard time claiming he doesn't know the "facts" and yet you are making a counter claim without any facts to back it up...

So is this proof that you "carrying the water" for Mittens without any proof at all to back up your claims...

For shame

 

[Accountable]

*chuckle* you guys are funny, arguing over which dick you prefer to be fucked by.

It doesn't matter how Romney did it in the past. He wasn't able to direct the power of federal law. IF he makes it into the oval office he'll do it the same way President Obama's been doing it: Keep the tyrannical systems his predecessors put in place, "enhance" them to do more than they were able to do right away, add another system on top to suck more power from the state governments and liberty from The People.

 

[Minor Axis]

Nope you can do the research

Just like you did with regard to why Ford did not need a bailout.

Let me know how that works for ya

Here is a pretty fair article showing that Bain was not completely evil.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-bain-capital/2012/05/29/gJQA9RPK0U_blog.html

*chuckle* you guys are funny, arguing over which dick you prefer to be fucked by.

Crude replies don't deserve a serious response...

 

[Maulds]

Crude replies don't deserve a serious response...

His words were crude but he was still right.

 

[Alien Allen]

I am fully aware of Romneys downside

I merely was responding to the crap about Bain being so evil

I think some people have watched the movie Wall Street a few too many times and are not able to separate reality from fantacy

 

[Minor Axis]

I am fully aware of Romneys downside

I merely was responding to the crap about Bain being so evil

I think some people have watched the movie Wall Street a few too many times and are not able to separate reality from fantacy

Setting aside relative evilness or just what is considered acceptable by todays standards in venture capital corporations like Bain, if a candidate wants to run on his history of doing right by people and creating jobs, then isn't if fair to examine the claim? He can even run on a platform of if I screwed people, at least I know how to get things done and now I want to fix our country's problems. The concerns arise about in what manner will he "fix" things? Who (demographics) and what corporations are now going to get the welfare and who is going to be told they can lay in the gutter when they get sick. Yes this is retoric, but the concerns are still there and it is expected that Romney can verbalize them. Unfortunately he has a habit of telling crowds 1)the truth or 2)what they want to hear at a 5k (or was it a 50k) fund raiser dinner, when he describes 47% of the population as losers. A frank enlightening statement as to his perception. Let him be judged for it. Below average in head work, imo.

 

[Alien Allen]

Setting aside relative evilness or just what is considered acceptable by todays standards in venture capital corporations like Bain, if a candidate wants to run on his history of doing right by people and creating jobs, then isn't if fair to examine the claim? He can even run on a platform of if I screwed people, at least I know how to get things done and now I want to fix our country's problems. The concerns arise about in what manner will he "fix" things? Who (demographics) and what corporations are now going to get the welfare and who is going to be told they can lay in the gutter when they get sick. Yes this is retoric, but the concerns are still there and it is expected that Romney can verbalize them. Unfortunately he has a habit of telling crowds 1)the truth or 2)what they want to hear at a 5k (or was it a 50k) fund raiser dinner, when he describes 47% of the population as losers. A frank enlightening statement as to his perception. Let him be judged for it. Below average in head work, imo.

I don't support Romney. I am a Ron Paul supporter.

But what is highlighted is kind of laughable. Presidents and congress have been bought and paid for since long ago and you seem to not have a problem with the likes of Solyndra and other similar pets of those in DC. Then you have the Delphi retirement screwjob.

 

[Minor Axis]

I don't support Romney. I am a Ron Paul supporter.

But what is highlighted is kind of laughable. Presidents and congress have been bought and paid for since long ago and you seem to not have a problem with the likes of Solyndra and other similar pets of those in DC. Then you have the Delphi retirement screwjob.

Bottom line I want a system designed to be concerned about the majority, not give them undue gifts, but express concern, not disdain, try to help where it can, and not try to hand the wealthiest people in the country more benefits that they don't need. I'm sure a lot of business oriented people have real sympathy for the poor rich...but I'm not one of them. If you are a 1%er, you are on easy street. Let's try to help those in need and I'll add, keep them accountable or send them all To Accountable's house for a handout. Redo the taxes, get rid of the loopholes, have a mature discussion about what we want from government and how we want to pay for it, stop robbing SS, raise taxes when needed (yes, some is needed), trim government and make it more efficient, that's my motto. Hey, maybe I should run for President?

 

[Accountable]

I don't support Romney. I am a Ron Paul supporter.

Ron Paul's not running.

 

[robdawg1]

Ron Paul's not running.

doesnt make him less viable as a *write in*

 

[Accountable]

doesnt make him less viable as a *write in*

Not relevant. PLEEEEEEEASE crawl out of that groupthink that you should only vote for who you think will win. This isn't horse racing, and casting a vote is not the same as placing a bet. The guy that's going to win this time is BAD FOR AMERICA. Same for the next few elections. Same for all elections so long as otherwise reasonable people keep stupidly voting for status quo.

 

[Alien Allen]

Ron Paul's not running.

No shit Sherlock

I had no idea

 

[robdawg1]

Not relevant. PLEEEEEEEASE crawl out of that groupthink that you should only vote for who you think will win. This isn't horse racing, and casting a vote is not the same as placing a bet. The guy that's going to win this time is BAD FOR AMERICA. Same for the next few elections. Same for all elections so long as otherwise reasonable people keep stupidly voting for status quo.

so why would voting for Ron Paul be a bad thing...according to your argument if he supports Ron Paul, and Ron Paul isnt on the ballot what is wrong with supporting/voting for Ron Paul? Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul!!! LOL

 

[Accountable]

so why would voting for Ron Paul be a bad thing...according to your argument if he supports Ron Paul, and Ron Paul isnt on the ballot what is wrong with supporting/voting for Ron Paul? Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul!!! LOL

The word you used was "viable".