pladecalvo
Member
:24: Man! That deserves reps if only for the laugh I got from it.Christianity is based on critical thinking.
:24: Man! That deserves reps if only for the laugh I got from it.Christianity is based on critical thinking.
You really haven't read the gospels have you? Read first the eyewitness accounts, then come back.Hang on! You said in another thread..."But we have however the security and assurance of going into a world where there will be no more suffering." Can't you theist be consistent?
Please, please, please would just one theist produce these "eye-witness" accounts.
Not really! Lying means that you are making a deliberate attempt to deceive. People were just like you in that they believed it was true.
People who claim it are also under an obligation to produce evidence to support their claim
No! You believe he is right.
Sp what you are saying here is that in order to 'find' god you have to first believe in his existence. Isn't that rather circular?
Are yes!! The old .....you're not a Real Christian(tm) argument.
:24: Man! That deserves reps if only for the laugh I got from it.
You really haven't read the gospels have you? Read first the eyewitness accounts, then come back.
The two different years of birth for your man god.Why should I not be? There is not one vers in the whole Bible that until now has proven to be false. Perhaps you can prove me wrong then and show me something out of the Bible to be untrustworthy?
Christiany IS NOT based on critical thinking. It's based on circular logic, fear and blind belief.
Don't you assume that there is no God?I don't have to prove you wrong, you are starting from an assumption. The burden of proof is on YOU! You are trying to build a skyscraper starting from the top. You are deliberately ignoring that there is nothing underneath the skyscraper to keep it up.
Gillibean is correct. The Gospels are not eye-witness accounts. They are hearsay stories written by anonymous authors.You really haven't read the gospels have you? Read first the eyewitness accounts, then come back.
Gilli, don't throw every Christian into the same basket. It's insulting.
Besides that, carry on.
Who made you believe that?Gillibean is correct. The Gospels are not eye-witness accounts. They are hearsay stories written by anonymous authors.
Don't you assume that there is no God?
Don't give a review of a book you haven't read. Read it first.Those aren't eyewitness account. That's unproveable hearsay.
That's just how that comment came off, is all. No worries.
Don't give a review of a book you haven't read. Read it first.
The Gospels were written between 70CE and 110CE by anonymous authors. If, as you claim, they are eye-witness accounts that would mean that the first author (assuming they were roughly the same age as your man god) started writing at the age of around 70 years and the last was around 110 years old. How likely do you think it is that people would have lived to that age in the 1st century? Even if they did live to that age, how would you rate the accuracy of the accounts of a 110 year old man writing from memory about events that happened 80 years beforehand?Who made you believe that?
Do you believe that they were eye-witness accounts? And if not, why not?The Gospels were written between 70CE and 110CE by anonymous authors. If, as you claim, they are eye-witness accounts that would mean that the first author (assuming they were roughly the same age as your man god) started writing at the age of around 70 years and the last was around 110 years old. How likely do you think it is that people would have lived to that age in the 1st century? Even if they did live to that age, how would you rate the accuracy of the accounts of a 110 year old man writing from memory about events that happened 80 years beforehand?
Remember that God made man. He made the laws of physics, laws of nature, laws of etc...The Gospels were written between 70CE and 110CE by anonymous authors. If, as you claim, they are eye-witness accounts that would mean that the first author (assuming they were roughly the same age as your man god) started writing at the age of around 70 years and the last was around 110 years old. How likely do you think it is that people would have lived to that age in the 1st century? Even if they did live to that age, how would you rate the accuracy of the accounts of a 110 year old man writing from memory about events that happened 80 years beforehand?
I would have thought that it was patently clear that I don't believe they are.Do you believe that they were eye-witness accounts?
I've just told you in post 256.And if not, why not?
So that's it is it? That's your answer.... 'God did it'. That's your idea of the "critical thinking" that you claim Christians use.Remember that God made man. He made the laws of physics, laws of nature, laws of etc...
Nothing is impossible for the Creator of all things.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.