The separation of church and state.

Users who are viewing this thread

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Robert Morris
Pennsylvania
Episcopalian
John Morton
Pennsylvania
Episcopalian
Stephen Hopkins
Rhode Island
Episcopalian
Carter Braxton
Virginia
Episcopalian
Benjamin Harrison
Virginia
Episcopalian
Thomas Nelson Jr.
Virginia
Episcopalian
George Wythe
Virginia
Episcopalian
Thomas Jefferson
Virginia
Episcopalian (Deist)
Benjamin Franklin
Pennsylvania
Episcopalian (Deist)
Button Gwinnett
Georgia
Episcopalian; Congregationalist
James Wilson
Pennsylvania
Episcopalian; Presbyterian
Joseph Hewes
North Carolina
Quaker, Episcopalian
George Clymer
Pennsylvania
Quaker, Episcopalian
Thomas McKean
Delaware
Presbyterian
Matthew Thornton
New Hampshire
Presbyterian
Abraham Clark
New Jersey
Presbyterian
John Hart
New Jersey
Presbyterian
Richard Stockton
New Jersey
Presbyterian
John Witherspoon
New Jersey
Presbyterian
William Floyd
New York
Presbyterian
Philip Livingston
New York
Presbyterian
James Smith
Pennsylvania
Presbyterian
George Taylor
Pennsylvania
Presbyterian
Benjamin Rush
Pennsylvania
Presbyterian
 
  • 107
    Replies
  • 3K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

memento_mori

Active Member
Messages
1,531
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
going to church wasn't uncommon in the late 1700s. it doesn't prove that they believed in a deist god.

but back to politics, i don't think it's right for church and state to mix and i haven't seen any arguments for that to happen.
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I'm going to wait for your buddy the history major to pipe in before I respond again. They say laughter is the best medicine, ... or something along those lines. :D

But FWIW, going to church is not uncommon in the 2000's either. And how many atheists do you think attend service regularly? ;)
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z


Name of Signer

State

Religious Affiliation
Charles Carroll
Maryland
Catholic
Samuel Huntington
Connecticut
Congregationalist
Roger Sherman
Connecticut
Congregationalist
William Williams
Connecticut
Congregationalist
Oliver Wolcott
Connecticut
Congregationalist
Lyman Hall
Georgia
Congregationalist
Samuel Adams
Massachusetts
Congregationalist
John Hancock
Massachusetts
Congregationalist
Josiah Bartlett
New Hampshire
Congregationalist
William Whipple
New Hampshire
Congregationalist
William Ellery
Rhode Island
Congregationalist
John Adams
Massachusetts
Congregationalist; Unitarian
Robert Treat Paine
Massachusetts
Congregationalist; Unitarian
George Walton
Georgia
Episcopalian
John Penn
North Carolina
Episcopalian
George Ross
Pennsylvania
Episcopalian
Thomas Heyward Jr.
South Carolina
Episcopalian
Thomas Lynch Jr.
South Carolina
Episcopalian
Arthur Middleton
South Carolina
Episcopalian
Edward Rutledge
South Carolina
Episcopalian
Francis Lightfoot Lee
Virginia
Episcopalian
Richard Henry Lee
Virginia
Episcopalian
George Read
Delaware
Episcopalian
Caesar Rodney
Delaware
Episcopalian
Samuel Chase
Maryland
Episcopalian
William Paca
Maryland
Episcopalian
Thomas Stone
Maryland
Episcopalian
Elbridge Gerry
Massachusetts
Episcopalian
Francis Hopkinson
New Jersey
Episcopalian
Francis Lewis
New York
Episcopalian
Lewis Morris
New York
Episcopalian
William Hooper
North Carolina
Episcopalian

That proves nothing except that they went to church. I'm an atheist and I still went to church sometimes because of family. Plus, politicians would find it socially expedient to go to church so the people would see them in a better light. Again, you also have to recognize they difference between the concept of god to many of the founding fathers back then, and the concept of god we think of now.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
I'm going to wait for your buddy the history major to pipe in before I respond again. They say laughter is the best medicine, ... or something along those lines. :D

But FWIW, going to church is not uncommon in the 2000's either. And how many atheists do you think attend service regularly? ;)

If you think I'm implying that some of the founding fathers were atheist you're kidding yourself. Do you know what a deist even is?
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
If you think I'm implying that some of the founding fathers were atheist you're kidding yourself.

You should stick to arguments of reason, and get away from arguments of history. It'll emphasize your strengths, especially your mastery of the written word.

We dissagree. No point in continuing.

All Else Failed said:
Do you know what a deist even is?

:24: I love it when people learn new words.

To answer momento's question, I don't think government should be a sponsor of religion either. Government should not stand in the way of our society expressing its views though. Never in the history of man has there ever been a group of people to agree on 100% of the issues. This should not stop societies from being expressive though. All human progress, and all civilized society would grind to a halt within hours of beginning the world your road would lead us to.

There are people who are offended at the idea of eating meat, and war monuments, and having sex, and taking showers, etc... Which of these items should we stop? I'm offended by people who are offended. lol What does that buy me? :jk
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
You should stick to arguments of reason, and get away from arguments of history. It'll emphasize your strengths, especially your mastery of the written word.

We dissagree. No point in continuing.



:24: I love it when people learn new words.

To answer momento's question, I don't think government should be a sponsor of religion either. Government should not stand in the way of our society expressing its views though. Never in the history of man has there ever been a group of people to agree on 100% of the issues. This should not stop societies from being expressive though. All human progress, and all civilized society would grind to a halt within hours of beginning the world your road would lead us to.

There are people who are offended at the idea of eating meat, and war monuments, and having sex, and taking showers, etc... Which of these items should we stop? I'm offended by people who are offended. lol What does that buy me? :jk

Since history has relevance in this discussion I will continue to raise the original intent of our founding fathers: A secular nation and government.


What do you mean "learn new words"? I've known what a deist is for quite some time...why are you dodging my points?


Religious people should certainly take part in the government, but when their religion starts to creep into everyone else's lives, then its our problem.

Here are some quotes of the people who actually planned America's government out:

THOMAS JEFFERSON:

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"In every country and every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot ... they have perverted the purest religion ever preached to man into mystery and jargon, unintelligible to all mankind, and therefore the safer engine for their purpose."[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] - to Horatio Spafford, March 17, 1814[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif].[/FONT]



[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] - letter to Peter Carr, Aug. 10, 1787[/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"The priests of the superstition, a bloodthirsty race, are as cruel and remorseless as the being whom they represented as the family God of Abraham, of Isaac and of Jacob, and the local God of Israel. That Jesus did not mean to impose himself on mankind as the son of God, physically speaking, I have been convinced by the writings of men more learned than myself in that lore."[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] - to Story, Aug. 4, 1820[/FONT]





BENJAMIN FRANKLIN:[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif].[/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]". . . Some books against Deism fell into my hands. . . It happened that they wrought an effect on my quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the Deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutations; in short, I soon became a thorough Deist."[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif].[/FONT]



[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"I wish it (Christianity) were more productive of good works ... I mean real good works ... not holy-day keeping, sermon-hearing ... or making long prayers, filled with flatteries and compliments despised by wise men, and much less capable of pleasing the Deity."[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] - Works, Vol. VII, p. 75[/FONT]



[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"If we look back into history for the character of the present sects in Christianity, we shall find few that have not in their turns been persecutors, and complainers of persecution. The primitive Christians thought persecution extremely wrong in the Pagans, but practiced it on one another. The first Protestants of the Church of England blamed persecution in the Romish Church, but practiced it upon the Puritans. They found it wrong in Bishops, but fell into the practice themselves both here (England) and in New England."[/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason."[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] -in Poor Richard's Almanac[/FONT]


JAMES MADISON:

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"What influence, in fact, have ecclesiastical establishments had on society? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of the civil authority; on many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have they been the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wish to subvert the public liberty may have found an established clergy convenient auxiliaries. A just government, instituted to secure and perpetuate it, needs them not."[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] - "A Memorial and Remonstrance", 1785[/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
"Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise."
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] -letter to Wm. Bradford, April 1, 1774[/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in blood for centuries."[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] -1803 letter objecting use of gov. land for churches[/FONT]





[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]JOHN ADAMS:[/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"As I understand the Christian religion, it was, and is, a revelation. But how has it happened that millions of fables, tales, legends, have been blended with both Jewish and Christian revelation that have made them the most bloody religion that ever existed?"[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] -letter to F.A. Van der Kamp, Dec. 27, 1816[/FONT]



[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"The divinity of Jesus is made a convenient cover for absurdity. Nowhere in the Gospels do we find a precept for Creeds, Confessions, Oaths, Doctrines, and whole cartloads of other foolish trumpery that we find in Christianity."[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] .[/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"Can a free government possibly exist with the Roman Catholic religion?"[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] -letter to Thomas Jefferson



[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]". . . Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind."[/FONT]



GEORGE WASHINGTON:

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif].[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"Religious controversies are always productive of more acrimony and irreconcilable hatreds than those which spring from any other cause. Of all the animosities which have existed among mankind, those which are caused by the difference of sentiments in religion appear to be the most inveterate and distressing, and ought most to be depreciated. I was in hopes that the enlightened and liberal policy, which has marked the present age, would at least have reconciled Christians of every denomination so far that we should never again see the religious disputes carried to such a pitch as to endanger the peace of society."[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] - letter to Edward Newenham, 1792[/FONT]




Oh yeah, the MAJOR founding fathers, the men who built this country and came up for what it stood for were VERY DEVOUT CHRISTIANS! :24:




Here is some reading I want you to do:

The Christian Nation Myth
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]http://freethought.homestead.com/America.html
America is Not a Christian Nation - Robert Paul Reyes - MensNewsDaily.com™
Is America a Christian Nation?
[/FONT]
 

raubin

Banned
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Politics and religion just simply doesn't mix, the government shouldn't have anything to do with religion and visa versa. There are enough wars out there and conflicts because of peoples different faiths without politic wars that are around as well.
 

Reaver

Active Member
Messages
1,138
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
biblefight.jpg
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Politics and religion just simply doesn't mix, the government shouldn't have anything to do with religion and visa versa. There are enough wars out there and conflicts because of peoples different faiths without politic wars that are around as well.
Surely the government should step in if religion breaks laws?
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Since history has relevance in this discussion I will continue....

What do you mean "learn new words"? I've known what a deist is for quite some time...why are you dodging my points?


Religious people should certainly take part in the government, but when their religion starts to creep into everyone else's lives, then its our problem.

... ...

Oh yeah, the MAJOR founding fathers, the men who built this country and came up for what it stood for were VERY DEVOUT CHRISTIANS! :24:

Here is some reading I want you to do:

The Christian Nation Myth
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]http://freethought.homestead.com/America.html[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]America is Not a Christian Nation - Robert Paul Reyes - MensNewsDaily.com™[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Is America a Christian Nation?[/FONT]

Look friend, the sources you're pointing to are exactly, .... Exactly what I was talking about several posts ago when I said you couldn't rely on one click Google searches to back or base your opinions. Don't you think that in 5 seconds I could post up 100 different links to opinions that were opposite those that you just laid out? My view is not popular opinion magically.

I could make the statement that Hitler wasn't all that bad a guy, just mis-understood, and link 50 sites in about a minute. I could say that Aliens planted human life on Earth, and post believable clickies. No problem.

I'm looking at the list of quotes you've pasted, and let me just point out my first observations.... Almost all of these are from the "Deists" that you're so fond of. Even many of those however are either taken out of context, or simply require a deeper understanding of the religion (and language of the day) to understand. If you go to any good church for about a month, you have a 99% chance of hearing the preacher say religion is a bad thing. Religion is actually what you hate so much too. It is a bondage. A set of rules, regulations, and paths that are choses by others for you. In the Christian faith, Jesus Christ actually fought the establishment of "religion." The Bible doesn't say "Go to church 3 times a week, and sing this many hymns, and give x % to the preacher. The Bible teaches love and respect. The word "religion" has two different meanings. One is a description of a faith, the other is the bad one that religious and non-religious people dislike so much.

I could write you a short book on this, or you can just take my word for it. The best thing would be for you to look into it yourself, or even challenge a local preacher with it. See if I'm making it up.

I was being genuine when I offered you the advice I did. You're too smart a guy to let a simple bad habit wreck your credibility.

You have your beliefs, and that's cool. You can look back in time, and find items that 'validate' those beliefs, and that's simply human nature. But spouting those beliefs as 'historic fact' that can be 'taken to the bank' will only work with people who don't have a deeper understanding of the material at hand, and make you look silly to somebody who has spent years studying the subject. There are subtle quirks in history you cannot pick up from a brief search, but missing these things in your post make it painfully obvious to your reader how you're working.

You and I haven't talked for very long, but if you stick around long enough, you'll hear me warn a lot of people about getting information out of opinion papers. It's something we're all guilty of sometimes, but you really have to watch out. It can be intoxicating to read people who agree with you. I assume at 19 you're a Freshman or Sophomore in your History major, but I promise you that what I'm telling you, your professors will re-enforce multiple times over the next couple of years.

To study a subject from only one point of view is not study.

What points of yours was I dodging? I'm trying to be thorough, but you guys post a million times a minute more than I do, and it's tough to keep up. ha-ha.

PS: What is your specific area of study? I'm a huge history nut too, but wasn't brave enough to take it in school. What career paths are you looking at?
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Look friend, the sources you're pointing to are exactly, .... Exactly what I was talking about several posts ago when I said you couldn't rely on one click Google searches to back or base your opinions. Don't you think that in 5 seconds I could post up 100 different links to opinions that were opposite those that you just laid out? My view is not popular opinion magically.

I could make the statement that Hitler wasn't all that bad a guy, just mis-understood, and link 50 sites in about a minute. I could say that Aliens planted human life on Earth, and post believable clickies. No problem.

I'm looking at the list of quotes you've pasted, and let me just point out my first observations.... Almost all of these are from the "Deists" that you're so fond of. Even many of those however are either taken out of context, or simply require a deeper understanding of the religion (and language of the day) to understand. If you go to any good church for about a month, you have a 99% chance of hearing the preacher say religion is a bad thing. Religion is actually what you hate so much too. It is a bondage. A set of rules, regulations, and paths that are choses by others for you. In the Christian faith, Jesus Christ actually fought the establishment of "religion." The Bible doesn't say "Go to church 3 times a week, and sing this many hymns, and give x % to the preacher. The Bible teaches love and respect. The word "religion" has two different meanings. One is a description of a faith, the other is the bad one that religious and non-religious people dislike so much.

I could write you a short book on this, or you can just take my word for it. The best thing would be for you to look into it yourself, or even challenge a local preacher with it. See if I'm making it up.

I was being genuine when I offered you the advice I did. You're too smart a guy to let a simple bad habit wreck your credibility.

You have your beliefs, and that's cool. You can look back in time, and find items that 'validate' those beliefs, and that's simply human nature. But spouting those beliefs as 'historic fact' that can be 'taken to the bank' will only work with people who don't have a deeper understanding of the material at hand, and make you look silly to somebody who has spent years studying the subject. There are subtle quirks in history you cannot pick up from a brief search, but missing these things in your post make it painfully obvious to your reader how you're working.

You and I haven't talked for very long, but if you stick around long enough, you'll hear me warn a lot of people about getting information out of opinion papers. It's something we're all guilty of sometimes, but you really have to watch out. It can be intoxicating to read people who agree with you. I assume at 19 you're a Freshman or Sophomore in your History major, but I promise you that what I'm telling you, your professors will re-enforce multiple times over the next couple of years.

To study a subject from only one point of view is not study.

What points of yours was I dodging? I'm trying to be thorough, but you guys post a million times a minute more than I do, and it's tough to keep up. ha-ha.

PS: What is your specific area of study? I'm a huge history nut too, but wasn't brave enough to take it in school. What career paths are you looking at?

Except all of those links list facts and they are undeniable.

Actually, I've read the actual private letters of the founding fathers in various books, and they weren't taken out of context at all.

The bible also teaches you that you're a no good sinner that can do nothing without a magic man and his edible flesh and blood. Why put the entire race of man down like that? For one, I believe that mankind can redeem themselves and be good without some sky daddy ruling over their actions and thoughts.

What is my bad habit? Listing scientific and historical fact? You seem to think I do not know anything of history too, which is your mistake. I spend plenty of time studying this country's history.


I was in a Roman Catholic school for 7 years, I challenged plenty of religious people, and most of them ended up being stumped, and played the "well we have to have faith in the lord!" BULL! Its not my fault that they cannot provide one shred of actual proof for their own faith.


I'm an American history major and I plan on teaching high school history.


I have no quarrel with you. I think you're a nice dude, we just have very strong opinions.
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
LOL 90% of that reply is the reason why I can't really talk to you anymore!! :p

Except all of those links list facts and they are undeniable.

You keep saying words like "undeniable" and "fact," but the fact is, that 78% of Americans deny what you're pushing. :D

Cool deal on being a teacher. Thanks for your planned service.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
LOL 90% of that reply is the reason why I can't really talk to you anymore!! :p



You keep saying words like "undeniable" and "fact," but the fact is, that 78% of Americans deny what you're pushing. :D

Cool deal on being a teacher. Thanks for your planned service.

What bothered you about my post? I don't see what is so disagreeable.


Just because a lot of people do not accept it doesn't make it less factual. In fact, Most Americans believe in something that is fact-less! :tongue:

They deny it because they have been raised religious all of their lives, and were taught that the bible is true and evolution = nonsense/work of the devil.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
lol I can't believe I'm making you so frustrated by not even trying to make you frustrated.


But, going back to my point in my other post, the majority of Americans reject my point of view (the point of view with the most evidence behind it...) because of religious tradition. They have been told their whole lives that it is false and that is that.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top