Jace isnt baptized eitherMy family isn't really religious either. I wasn't en baptized
Jace isnt baptized eitherMy family isn't really religious either. I wasn't en baptized
I think being Jewish is a null point... In America it's a common practice. My family is Episcopalian and I was circumcized
Why?
Whats your reasoning FOR...you've heard all ours against....just curious is all.
Are you Jewish?
2. There is evidence to suggest that there could be health benefits from it
Scientifically collected probably
There's evidence for both sides that either circumcised or not, there's health benefits. But who knows, so many other things can affect susceptibility to diseases and penile functioning besides just the skin that covers it.
sounds like a win on all levels to me.
I don't know if I could risk the "IF it is performed properly" part though.
Just curious... if you weren't already circumcised would you have it done now?
I don't think it should be banned... but I think parents should really consider what's best got the kid. Socially, it's clear that if you're born in the US of Canadia, it would be in your child's best interest to be circumcised. Just don't try and make any other excuse for it tho
Not Jewish, I plan on having it done for my child because
1. I just think it looks better
2. There is evidence to suggest that there could be health benefits from it
3. The majority of Americans have the procedure done, I don't want him to grow up being different from all the other guys
Yeah I was thinking the same. Penises vary person to person, meaning that the circumcision operation isn't 'standardised'. How can it be performed properly?
The only guy I was with who had premature ejaculation was the one who was circumcised actually. He also got thrush and was terrible in bed.
Out of curiosity... of those that are against circumcision, how many of you support abortion?
What does aborting a baby have to do with cutting off a foreskin? Or have I completely missed something?
I think he thinks it hypocritical to say that Since a child can't consent that it's wrong for a parent to choose to have their foreskin removed for them, but at the same time believe that it's perfectly ok to choose to end a babies life before it even has the chance to be born.
I think he thinks it hypocritical to say that Since a child can't consent that it's wrong for a parent to choose to have their foreskin removed for them, but at the same time believe that it's perfectly ok to choose to end a babies life before it even has the chance to be born.
Would anyone agree with me that that's a straw man? Or something of the like?
I don't think it's relevant
Would anyone agree with me that that's a straw man? Or something of the like?
I don't think it's relevant
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.