I agree with your summation, but I see a distinction between the reality we exist in and the projection of the concept 'faith' as an answer for the unknowable within our physical realm. So the concept of faith shouldn't be an issue that interferes with the logic of science, imo.....
I just want to be clear on the definition of faith as used in my references...
When I am talking about faith, I am referring to religious faith. I mean I have faith in a lot of things that can't be shown or proved.
Now onto a few things I want to clear up about what I believe.
First I am not an atheist because science cannot prove the existence of god or some sort of deity. I am not an atheist because I believe in science.
I am an atheist because the concept of believing in a deity doesn't make sense to me. Because I believe I understand why and where religion and the belief in deities came from. It just makes sense to me.
As far as "Blind faith" goes... I truly believe there is a difference in faith and blind faith..
No one has ever seen a black hole. Science can show mathematically they exist and their is a lot of evidence to their existence, but no hard proof. So yes I have faith that they exist. But it's backed up with pretty solid evidence and mathematics...
To truly believe in Thor sitting in the clouds would require blind faith... to me it just doesn't make sense to take someone else's story and blindly believe in it...
Those differences may not come across very well to you and I may have done a poor job defining them, but it's how I see things for me.
And I have no intention to shatter anyone's beliefs... but if that's the conclusion from their own thoughtful examination of their own beliefs, then so be it...