Goat Whisperer
Well-Known Member
But in your scenario w/ the released murderer he went on to kill an innocent person...so how is that better???
Lol that didn't make any sense...
But in your scenario w/ the released murderer he went on to kill an innocent person...so how is that better???
I can understand that...and I agree. BUT on the flip side...if it was MY mother, brother, sister, father, whatever that they KILLED...I want them to pay.
Actually, I highly doubt they would all be serial murderers. In fact, 1% of them would be serial murderers. As most murders are crimes of passion done on the spur of the moment with intent but without premeditation.
And there is a difference between us unjustfully sentencing someone to death, as a nation, and an individual murdering someone because we failed to convict them.
But its a lot about setting a precedent to discourage people who have the choice to commit such an act from ever acting it out.
Its been pretty much established in academic circles that capital punishment isn't an effective deterrent for committing serious crimes such as murder and rape.
In Dei delitti e delle pene, Cesare Beccaria wrote 'Its the certainty of punishment, rather than the severity, is a more effective deterrent'.
And did you know that 87% of statistics are made up on the spot?
I'm also for fewer appeals in death penalty cases.
Peter are you pro assisted suicide?...for someone whos is deathly ill, you think it should be made legal for them to end there life without having to go through the suffering?...
What about for a unborn baby...whos mother has been told he will life a live of pain, and not live long....Do you think she is murdering that child by choosing to end its life before it begins??Saving it suffering?
I am against assisted suicide because of all the loopholes it presents. I dont want to see terminally ill people suffer but legallising it opens the way for people bumping off relatives for their inheritance and putting pressure on them for being a burden ect.
The abortion argument - as I've said else where, I think it should be legal in exceptional circumstances, like this, for instance.
But in your scenario w/ the released murderer he went on to kill an innocent person...so how is that better???
That's why you only make it possible for them to decide if they want to live anymore, alone, in their hospital room. And you only kill vegetables that signed their piece of paper stating that's what they wanted before their coma.
I still don't think it's fair to the lonely old man that is in a lot of pain. He wants to be put out of misery, but you won't let him, because he might be being peer pressured?
Life's not fair, there is no perfect solution but it's better than people being bumped off through corruption.
Depends. The article doesn't say...does he admit to setting the fire but deny that he did it to kill the little girl??? If he set the fire and the little girl died in it, then he is guilty of what we call a capital offense and, yes, he should die. If he denies even setting the fire and the state is conceding that he may not be at fault, then I'm glad they got it sorted out and I think he should OWN that county.Would you have liked to see Kenny Richie , an innocent man killed? He would have been if it wasn't for the appeals, he even came hours from being executed.
BBC NEWS | Scotland | Edinburgh, East and Fife | Death row Scot set to be released
That's fine in theory...but the overcrowding in jails is bad enough w/o housing people for life.You don't release ANYONE. You just don't KILL anyone; so that way if they are found innocent later on they can still be released. The only people released here are the innocent.
I just don't believe that there are hundreds of innocent people being executed all the time in a society where any smidge of reasonable doubt requires a not guilty verdict and I'll never change my mind on that one no matter what statistics you throw at me.
Me said:In the United Sates since 1972, 78 people on death row have eventually been exonerated and their innocence established. In the same period, there were 504 executions. That represents about 1 in 8 being innocent.
I didn't miss it the first time. It says people on death row were exonerated...it does NOT say they were exonerated after having been executed.Bump....
I didn't miss it the first time. It says people on death row were exonerated...it does NOT say they were exonerated after having been executed.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.