andcuriouser
Active Member
In a word, yes.
It's cultural differences, economic differences, stereotypes that make it seem otherwise.
It's cultural differences, economic differences, stereotypes that make it seem otherwise.
Atl Falcons said:TheOriginalJames said:Atl Falcons said:and furthermore, you guys are picking on a 15 year old and the rest of you are like 50.....how do you feel? Do you feel smart?
wait... what? You're fifteen and you were calling me dumb because my real world experiences and opinions don't concur with your dry eared word of mouth from your parents opinion?
:rofl I should have known.
:rofl :funnah are you saying I was kicking your ass, or at least had you thinking? You admitted that on accident by saying "i should've known."
andcuriouser said:In a word, yes.
It's cultural differences, economic differences, stereotypes that make it seem otherwise.
TheOriginalJames said:Atl Falcons said:TheOriginalJames said:Atl Falcons said:and furthermore, you guys are picking on a 15 year old and the rest of you are like 50.....how do you feel? Do you feel smart?
wait... what? You're fifteen and you were calling me dumb because my real world experiences and opinions don't concur with your dry eared word of mouth from your parents opinion?
:rofl I should have known.
:rofl :funnah are you saying I was kicking your ass, or at least had you thinking? You admitted that on accident by saying "i should've known."
Nah. Only thing I was thinking about was how badly I wanted to call you names too.
But religion is not a topic I talk about. Religion sucks.
It's cultural differences, economic differences, stereotypes that make it seem otherwise.
andcuriouser said:a) READ WHAT THE HELL I WROTE:
It's cultural differences, economic differences, stereotypes that make it seem otherwise.
b) You have yet to give us proof of this extra calf muscle. I've searched around on google, but so far I only get people asking about it, and no solid proof that it exists.
andcuriouser said:Oh man.
It is not irrefutable (I'm going to assume that's what you meant) proof, because we haven't seen any proof. You have failed over and over again to show us this extra calf muscle, so as far as I am concerned, it doesn't exist, regardless of what your health class said. And textbooks are fraught with many inaccuracies, besides.
What I HAVE seen is a study that shows that black people have higher levels of testosterone and more "fast-twitch" fibres. Still, this doesn't mean that their brains function any less than anyone else's. Donovan Bailey (reigning 100m Olympic champion) was a stockbroker before he took up athletics, which certainly took some brainpower.
Which then forces me to ask, what exactly is your criteria for a "superior race"? We have seen many different ones over the years. The most notable example: in Germany, one had to be "Aryan". What are your criteria?
andcuriouser said:Oh man.
It is not irrefutable (I'm going to assume that's what you meant) proof, because we haven't seen any proof. You have failed over and over again to show us this extra calf muscle, so as far as I am concerned, it doesn't exist, regardless of what your health class said. And textbooks are fraught with many inaccuracies, besides.
What I HAVE seen is a study that shows that black people have higher levels of testosterone and more "fast-twitch" fibres. Still, this doesn't mean that their brains function any less than anyone else's. Donovan Bailey (reigning 100m Olympic champion) was a stockbroker before he took up athletics, which certainly took some brainpower.
Which then forces me to ask, what exactly is your criteria for a "superior race"? We have seen many different ones over the years. The most notable example: in Germany, one had to be "Aryan". What are your criteria?
andcuriouser said:I still think that's pretty weak. I understand your thesis, but I don't understand your criteria.
You're completely ignoring the economical, cultural and social differences everyone keeps pointing out to you.
Give me a list of criteria, and I will try to see it completely black-or-white, no-other-alternatives and then say yes or no to your thesis.
For instance, Aryans were considered the "superior race" to all others, and they weren't particularly athletic or intelligent, they just had certain ancestry.
andcuriouser said:I still think that's pretty weak. I understand your thesis, but I don't understand your criteria.
You're completely ignoring the economical, cultural and social differences everyone keeps pointing out to you.
Atl Falcons said:That's the point of my argument, I can solidly prove that races are unequal without looking or using the touchy subject of cultural and social differences......that can easily be refuted or thought to be false.
andcuriouser said:What are you using to define a superior race?
They must be...
Athletic
Intelligent
Have green hair
Whatever
You can't argue that a race is better than another without giving it walls. "Better" is very subjective.
And,
Atl Falcons said:That's the point of my argument, I can solidly prove that races are unequal without looking or using the touchy subject of cultural and social differences......that can easily be refuted or thought to be false.
No, you're just ignoring a huge part of it, not solidly proving anything.
TheOriginalJames said:Leland, I'm glad you joined. The education you received shows up in your perspective. Very well spoken.
andcuriouser said:Oh, and:
TheOriginalJames said:Leland, I'm glad you joined. The education you received shows up in your perspective. Very well spoken.
James? My education? Art school isn't relevant! Kidding, thanks buddy.
Honestly, I don't understand the motivation behind this kid's argument. Also, the fervour he argues with. We'll never agree. Why does he bother?
When I was fifteen I was less concerned with race and more concerned with getting good grades. And having sex, now that I think about it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.