Nutjobs and health care

Users who are viewing this thread

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
Maybe you didn't read my last post?

1) CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - CNN Truth Squad: Will new health bill cover illegal immigrants? « - Blogs from CNN.com

2) Page 143, Line 3, Section 246: "No Federal Payment for Undocumented Aliens. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States."

This bill can be amended at any time. You can bet the hues and cries will be out there in the next year or so if this bill passes to amend it to take care of the illegals. Of course that won't even be necessary because you can expect the liberals to try to grant amnesty.
 
  • 165
    Replies
  • 3K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Meirionnydd and Minor are as blind as any sheeple I've witnessed. lumpin with them that republican jackass that called Tim drunk. .... eta; Wolf-something.
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I had a whole response typed up, and then the forum ate it :(

Obama claims that Medicare benefits would not be cut, and yet part of the proposal on how to fund a $1 trillion UHC is to cut $500 billion from Medicare. The claim is that these cuts would only apply to waste, duplication and overpayments to doctors and hospitals. Yet we've proven that physicians are not in fact overpaid by Medicare to begin with, in fact they're reimbursed very little for their time. $1,100 on the high end of average for a foot amputation, including the pre-op consultations, the surgery itself, and follow-up care for up to 90 days. Yet Obama claims that those same physicians/surgeons get $30-50k for this surgery. He also claims that doctors perform tonsillectomies in order to "make lots of money"; Mr. President, go do some fact checking... the vast majority of tonsillectomies are performed because of persistent infections, and the rest are done because of an acute medical problem such as strep that is presenting at the time. His other ludicrous claim is that the imaginary $30-50k that a doctor supposedly gets for performing one of these "unnecessary" surgeries is received "immediately" by the physician. Mr. President, please do some fact checking... Medicare payments take 60-180 days to process. My dad is one of those Family Practice physicians that apparently send people off for unnecessary surgeries for the hell of it... and he is just now receiving reimbursement from Medicare for services rendered at the end of last year and the beginning of this year... and that is for simple office visits.

The other lies Obama has spread include the fact that the AARP has endorsed the plan, when it hasn't. He also claims that you'll be able to keep your existing health insurance... but what he doesn't mention is the fact that you get to keep it for up to 5 years if certain conditions are met, and if at any point during those 5 years you lose coverage, the terms change, or your insurance doesn't meet up with the standards set forth by the government, then you lose it and are put under the UHC. At the end of the 5-year "grace period", it is directly implied though not outwardly stated, that all citizens will be put onto the UHC. Has the economic impact of this even been considered... whether you like or dislike insurance companies, the fact still remains that the industry employs millions of people, but within 5 years most of those jobs will be gone because the insurance companies will cease to exist, or at least cease to exist as they do today. Don't believe me? Go read pages 16 and 17 of HR 3200 and see for yourself.

The claims that Democrats are the only ones who have "ever" put forth legislation that helps the American people is an outright lie, though I'm not surprised to hear it considering the sources. I suppose neither of you were either around to remember or have chosen to forget the Contract With America. The Republicans are the only ones in my lifetime that have ever lowered taxes for the American people... but they've also raised them.

You're hanging your hat on Obama's claims that illegal immigrants will not be covered under a UHC, as though an American President has never lied to the American people. Oh wait, we've already demonstrated that Obama has lied about this very UHC bill. Bush 43 lied about the reasons to invade Iraq in order to suit his own purposes. Clinton lied about Lewinsky, Whitewater, and numerous other things while in office. Bush 41 told the American people directly, "read my lips, no new taxes", and then raised taxes. Politicians lie, it's a proven fact... they lie all the freaking time, it's a way of life for most of them. I'm not saying that they all do, and that all politicians have their own needs placed over their constituents, but I'm willing to bet that there's at least a simple majority that do. So if Obama is willing to lie about everything else having to do with the UHC, why wouldn't he be willing to lie about the coverage of illegal immigrants.

Now, as far as the parts of the bill that I referenced, they seemed to my understanding, that they provided the ability for illegal immigrants to obtain coverage under this UHC... I may have been incorrect and am willing to do more research on it. But as AA has stated above, all that it would take would be the issuance of amnesty to all current illegal immigrants to cover those that are currently living here illegally, and make them legitimate. That's not too hard to believe, because it's something that the left has been pushing for quite some time now. I've also not found anything prevent illegal immigrants from being covered under the Senate bill... but I haven't fully read that one yet. Yes, there's a concept... I've actually been *reading* these bills in order to familiarize myself with them.

I'm also going to assume that since there was no attempt to defend the fact that Obama outright lied about physicians and their reimbursement for surgeries. As well as outright slandered them and their motivations to recommend such surgeries to patients, that either a) you're okay with the lies, or b) you're not okay with them, but to say such would further lower your credibility.

I realize that I'm more than likely not going to change anyone's mind here... especially people who are willingly ignoring facts and believe lies; but I had to give it a try.
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
retro said:
The claims that Democrats are the only ones who have "ever" put forth legislation that helps the American people is an outright lie, though I'm not surprised to hear it considering the sources. I suppose neither of you were either around to remember or have chosen to forget the Contract With America. The Republicans are the only ones in my lifetime that have ever lowered taxes for the American people... but they've also raised them.
I don't think lowering taxes was what he had in mind.

OSHA and EPA were passed by Nixon. Can't get a whole lot bigger than those two other than health care.

Also there rarely has been enough of one party in control to do what was wanted. It always took some from the other side of the aisle to pass legislation. So tis a really silly argument to begin with
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I don't think lowering taxes was what he had in mind.

OSHA and EPA were passed by Nixon. Can't get a whole lot bigger than those two other than health care.

Also there rarely has been enough of one party in control to do what was wanted. It always took some from the other side of the aisle to pass legislation. So tis a really silly argument to begin with

oh I know that taxes weren't the focal point there.... but the fact remains that the only times in my lifetime that I can recall that taxes have been lowered is when republicans have had the majority. Plus, whether you want to believe it or not, lowering taxes is helpful to the working class that supposedly only the democrats care about.
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
oh I know that taxes weren't the focal point there.... but the fact remains that the only times in my lifetime that I can recall that taxes have been lowered is when republicans have had the majority. Plus, whether you want to believe it or not, lowering taxes is helpful to the working class that supposedly only the democrats care about.
I am not arguing your point about what happens when taxes are lowered. The liberals for some reason always ignore the facts that doing so increases revenue. It goes against common sense in their minds because they use static thinking. The consider that since it is a net loss for an individuals tax liability that it is an across the board loss when in fact there are net gains because of the effect the lowering of taxes has on the economy. One only has to look right now at the economy to see how taxes are effected. I think the same rates were in effect for 2007 as today yet state, federal and local revenue is at all time lows and we are in a mess. Taxes rates were not lowered. Just the economy tanked.
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
Meirionnydd and Minor are as blind as any sheeple I've witnessed. lumpin with them that republican jackass that called Tim drunk. .... eta; Wolf-something.

Lol, you and others refuse to open your eyes. That solves that... not really. :p\

The claims that Democrats are the only ones who have "ever" put forth legislation that helps the American people is an outright lie, though I'm not surprised to hear it considering the sources.

Minimum wage, pension plans, labor laws in general, and possibly UHC- while conservatives do say, "we can't afford it", liberals make it happen (or do their best to make it happen) and yes it cost business some of their profits.
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Lol, you and others refuse to open your eyes. That solves that... not really. :p\



Minimum wage, pension plans, labor laws in general, and possibly UHC- while conservatives do say, "we can't afford it", liberals make it happen (or do their best to make it happen) and yes it cost business some of their profits.
Minimum wage is a useless political toy used for distraction, but yes there was a Dem president and congress in control the second time it was made law. (the first one was declared unconstitutional, go figger).

Pension plans??
Origin of ERISA
The first employer-sponsored retirement plans were established in the late 19th century, primarily in the railroad industry and among a few large industrial employers.

Still doesn't support your claim that "Every law that benefits average citizens that has EVER been passed in the country has been on behalf of liberal entities."
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Minimum wage, pension plans, labor laws in general, and possibly UHC- while conservatives do say, "we can't afford it", liberals make it happen (or do their best to make it happen) and yes it cost business some of their profits.


Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security are burning money like it's going out of style. Liberal ideas are great in a perfect world, but they tend to fall apart when you toss in a dose of reality.

I don't hear any liberal ideas to fix these massive government programs that don't simply throw more money at them in an attempt to push the crash off by a few more years.

No no, instead, let's make a new program that is 10 times the size of the others. That'll have to work!! :thumbdown


Post Script: I really do believe what I said about liberal ideas up there. They are genuinely good ideas from people with genuinely good heats. Just not practical.
 

Tangerine

Slightly Acidic
Messages
3,679
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
... and yes it cost business some of their profits.

Which, by the way, costs EVERYONE. Profits are what drives the stock market and every other facet of our economy. When you force business to profit less, everything grinds to a halt. Why do you think we are in the current mess? Because big business has seen profits plummet.
 

Meirionnydd

Active Member
Messages
793
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
This bill can be amended at any time. You can bet the hues and cries will be out there in the next year or so if this bill passes to amend it to take care of the illegals. Of course that won't even be necessary because you can expect the liberals to try to grant amnesty.

There's actually a suitable rationale to providing insurance to illegal immigrants. Because they're not insured, illegal immigrants usually go intimidately to the ER when sick, this comes at a massive cost (an ER is the most expensive place to treat someone) and it increases waiting times for everyone else.

However, I doubt that will happen with this bill. Namely because advocating for illegal immigrants is politically impossible. They don't vote either, and politicians don't like advocating for a group that can't return support in the form of votes.

Meirionnydd and Minor are as blind as any sheeple I've witnessed. lumpin with them that republican jackass that called Tim drunk. .... eta; Wolf-something.

Thanks. Remember there's a difference between 'being a sheep', and 'disagreeing with you'.

Obama claims that Medicare benefits would not be cut, and yet part of the proposal on how to fund a $1 trillion UHC is to cut $500 billion from Medicare. The claim is that these cuts would only apply to waste, duplication and overpayments to doctors and hospitals. Yet we've proven that physicians are not in fact overpaid by Medicare to begin with, in fact they're reimbursed very little for their time. $1,100 on the high end of average for a foot amputation, including the pre-op consultations, the surgery itself, and follow-up care for up to 90 days. Yet Obama claims that those same physicians/surgeons get $30-50k for this surgery. He also claims that doctors perform tonsillectomies in order to "make lots of money"; Mr. President, go do some fact checking... the vast majority of tonsillectomies are performed because of persistent infections, and the rest are done because of an acute medical problem such as strep that is presenting at the time. His other ludicrous claim is that the imaginary $30-50k that a doctor supposedly gets for performing one of these "unnecessary" surgeries is received "immediately" by the physician. Mr. President, please do some fact checking... Medicare payments take 60-180 days to process. My dad is one of those Family Practice physicians that apparently send people off for unnecessary surgeries for the hell of it... and he is just now receiving reimbursement from Medicare for services rendered at the end of last year and the beginning of this year... and that is for simple office visits.

In Australia, our UHC runs under the same premise in regard to independent G.P's. However, G.P's that decide to do bulk-bill are generally reimbursed for 100% of the cost of a patient visit, and payments are processed almost instantly.

You're hanging your hat on Obama's claims that illegal immigrants will not be covered under a UHC, as though an American President has never lied to the American people. Oh wait, we've already demonstrated that Obama has lied about this very UHC bill. Bush 43 lied about the reasons to invade Iraq in order to suit his own purposes. Clinton lied about Lewinsky, Whitewater, and numerous other things while in office. Bush 41 told the American people directly, "read my lips, no new taxes", and then raised taxes.
Politicians lie, it's a proven fact... they lie all the freaking time, it's a way of life for most of them. I'm not saying that they all do, and that all politicians have their own needs placed over their constituents, but I'm willing to bet that there's at least a simple majority that do. So if Obama is willing to lie about everything else having to do with the UHC, why wouldn't he be willing to lie about the coverage of illegal immigrants.

Well it's pretty obvious that he wasn't lying about saying that the bill wouldn't insure illegal immigrants. It's hard to get away with a lie like that when someone can go online and read the bill for themselves.

I may have been incorrect and am willing to do more research on it. But as AA has stated above, all that it would take would be the issuance of amnesty to all current illegal immigrants to cover those that are currently living here illegally, and make them legitimate.

Well that's a completely different issue, if there was an amnesty, illegal immigrants wouldn't exactly be in the U.S illegally anymore would they?

Regardless, the bill doesn't provide insurance for illegal immigrants.

I'm also going to assume that since there was no attempt to defend the fact that Obama outright lied about physicians and their reimbursement for surgeries. As well as outright slandered them and their motivations to recommend such surgeries to patients, that either a) you're okay with the lies, or b) you're not okay with them, but to say such would further lower your credibility.

Do you think that an issue like that plays a key role in the debate? Not really. People are either too stupid the issue, or don't really care about it all.

But, do the outrageous comments of some Conservative commentators and politicians play a key role in the debate? They do, and if you look at some questions and statements in townhall meetings happening across the U.S right now, you'll see my point.

Also, I don't support this bill they're proposing. I'm a proponent of a UHC system, but what's being proposed now is a very shitty and retarded attempt at doing so. Honestly, I think this bill is going to fail, or be totally ineffective.

I realize that I'm more than likely not going to change anyone's mind here... especially people who are willingly ignoring facts and believe lies; but I had to give it a try.

Yeah. Like the lie about the bill insuring illegal's.

Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security are burning money like it's going out of style. Liberal ideas are great in a perfect world, but they tend to fall apart when you toss in a dose of reality.

I don't hear any liberal ideas to fix these massive government programs that don't simply throw more money at them in an attempt to push the crash off by a few more years.

No no, instead, let's make a new program that is 10 times the size of the others. That'll have to work!! :thumbdown

Post Script: I really do believe what I said about liberal ideas up there. They are genuinely good ideas from people with genuinely good heats. Just not practical.

Of course ideas like that are practical. They just have to be funded and run correctly. Just because Medicare and Social Security have increasingly large expenditure in the U.S, doesn't mean that other places in the world haven't worked it out.
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Not insuring criminal aliens doesn't mean they won't receive medical care. Oh wait, getting free medical care on the taxpayer's tab ... wasn't this whole thing to take care of that problem?
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
If an illegal goes into a hospital today with bad chest pains is the hospital gonna treat them?

If the answer is yes then it stands to reason that nothing will change. They still would get that care. They just would not get the day to day general care. Still they will be covered to a degree. When instead they should be thrown on a medivac across the border
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Let's be real for a mo'. It's logistically too difficult/inconvenient today to identify illegal aliens for returning them home. There's going to be no effort at all to ascertain citizenship or anything else if this new system is in place. All are welcome. Hell, they'll probably allow people to register to vote while in the emergency room, democrat party being checked by default.
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
Let's be real for a mo'. It's logistically too difficult/inconvenient today to identify illegal aliens for returning them home. There's going to be no effort at all to ascertain citizenship or anything else if this new system is in place. All are welcome. Hell, they'll probably allow people to register to vote while in the emergency room, democrat party being checked by default.
not true if you had a single payer. if that were to happen then we would all have health cards and have to prove citizenship to get one. you got no card you get no service :D
 

skyblue

KEEP THE FAITH
Messages
27,194
Reaction score
16
Tokenz
0.34z
Yet people from around the world in countries with "public" health care flock to the US for the quality of the care, technology, innovation and medicine. Why does the US have such a formidable lead in those areas? Perhaps because the companies that lead are in business to make a profit?



Yet extremely rich people from around the world in countries with "public" health care flock to the US for the quality of the care, technology, innovation and medicine.


(edited)

you're all missing the point here...you'll still be able to have private health care if you can afford it
 
78,875Threads
2,185,392Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top