I know what scientific evidence is Failed, and maybe i cannot produce any. How can science prove someone that is divine? The bilble said that God is a spirit. If science cannot prove that ghost exist, which they do, how are they going to prove someone that is omnipotent?
Only simple mined people would go around saying, "where is the scientific evidence?" "prove this, prove that". That's weak. If i were to use your argument and ask you to disprove Jesus with science or ask you to use science and tell me how creation begins, you would be in the same spot i am now. But i don't use that because it is weak. I try to use different measures to prove my point.
If you look around us there is not one thing that was not made, created, produce, etc. nothing comes into existence without being created by someone or something. That my friend is call a cycle.
The only and most profound way to get factual evidence of Jesus is in the person who worship him and the work of the Lord Himself.
And as for the bible, it is without flaw my friend. all the words of the bible is the inspiration of God, and it is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.
I rest my case.
YOU SAID EARLIER THAT SCIENCE COULD PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS CHRIST. Now you're just backpedaling.
Yeah dude, weak minded people ask for evidence of unsubstantiated claims! Are joking? Strong minded people ask for evidence if someone comes and tells them something extraordinary. If people just accepted things "just because" then THEY are weak minded.
You: "I believe in a cosmic sky daddy that sent himself down to earth on a suicide mission to remove an evil force (sin) from people's bodies!"
Everyone who has a brain: "Um, ok, but how do you reputably justify your claims? Do you have some sort of reliable proof of this happening?"
You: "SHUT UP YOU JUST HAVE TO HAVE FAITH MANNNN."
See how that sounds? Stupid.
actually we do use science to prove how life originated it's called astronomy and biology. We just don't know how it all "began", and I use the word "began" sparingly because the universe could have always existed, but thats not a problem, since not know right away how everything began doesn't mean a divine source created it at all.
haha oh man, the "irreducible complexity argument". People who use this argument that "STUFF LOOKS COMPLICATED SO GOD MADE IT" know nothing about how evolution works. Go read a book.
You said: "nothing comes into existence without being created by someone or something." God is something. Where did he come from? Yes, this is a totally valid question if you are to follow your logic. If everything needs to be created by something, then what created god since he/she/it IS something? You'll probably say "Well god always was and forever will be so nothing created him" but that cancels out your argument that things need to be created by something or somoene, since things (i.e. god) can't just "be". So if you say God always was, I'll say the universe always was with no god.
No flaws in the bible? So you're not aware of the hundreds of contradicting stories? The flase histories? Are you aware that several universities offer entire classes dedicated to this subject?
