Did You Serve ?

[The Man]

to answer your question, no. However, serving a prison sentence after due process trial and conviction has not ever been considered torture.

So you are condoning torture rob.


as shown below

Definition of TORTURE
1
a : anguish of body or mind : agony
b : something that causes agony or pain
2
: the infliction of intense pain (as from burning, crushing, or wounding) to punish, coerce, or afford sadistic pleasure
3
: distortion or overrefinement of a meaning or an argument : straining
See torture defined for English-language learners »
See torture defined for kids »
Examples of TORTURE

Waiting is just torture for me.
Listening to him can be torture.

 

[Stone]

The reason why you havent been responding is because you cant back your lies

 

[Stone]

Admitting what claims.
Either show em or shut the fuck up

......

 

[Stone]

Are you a fucking moron?...or just being dishonest again.
Where have I condoned torture...show the posts.

 

[Stone]

You been in the cave with stone to long...the boarding happened under bush and was not an illegal act at the time.
Show the posts where I support torture...Seriously.
You keep making these claims
You admit you read the entire thread...so show the posts.

.:24:

 

[Stone]

Wrong.


Are you getting senile stone?
What the fuck does whether or not I served have to do with my statement of "McCain wasnt mentioning videos in regard the Benghazi incident"

You want to connect the dots on that one for me.

 

[robdawg1]

Also you said you would not condemn someone doing their job when it was legal?

"In 2007 it was reported that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was using waterboarding on extrajudicial prisoners and that the Department of Justice had authorized the procedure,[SUP][7][/SUP][SUP][8][/SUP] even though the United States government hanged Japanese soldiers for waterboarding US prisoners of war in World War II."

[SUP]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterboarding[/SUP]
[SUP]
You also made an argument that the guys were just doing their jobs but :

"The Court of Military Appeals held that "the justification for acts done pursuant to orders does not exist if the order was of such a nature that a man of ordinary sense and understanding would know it to be illegal.""
[SUP]http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/militarylaw1/a/obeyingorders.htm

so in conclusion, just because it was their job, does not make it right...[/SUP][/SUP]

 

[Stone]

Did you think it was okay to water board those captives under Bush? Was it the right thing to do?

Actually, he's already answered to the affirmative in both.

 

[robdawg1]

So you are condoning torture rob.


as shown below

Definition of TORTURE
1
a : anguish of body or mind : agony
b : something that causes agony or pain
2
: the infliction of intense pain (as from burning, crushing, or wounding) to punish, coerce, or afford sadistic pleasure
3
: distortion or overrefinement of a meaning or an argument : straining
See torture defined for English-language learners »
See torture defined for kids »
Examples of TORTURE

Waiting is just torture for me.
Listening to him can be torture.

did you pull any muscles on that stretch there TM?

 

[Stone]

Are you a fucking moron?
You are now asking me a question.
So now you dont even know what you were claiming?
You made a claim...how the fuck do you back a claim with a question.
Stop debating like a fucking third grader...and prove your accusation.
Point to post{s} to support your claim

.

 

[robdawg1]

Stone....with the picture....seriously you are clogging up my screen...LOL

 

[Stone]

Is that simple enough or do I have to break it down to pre school level for you

You're already there, sweetheart

 

[Stone]

back your claim you made it.
You dont back a claim with a question

What do you arrest someone for burglary then ask them if they broke in a place.
Fuck no...you have proof before hand
You made the claim...so back it or shut the fuck up.

 

[Stone]

Stop posting out of your ass tim...you admit you read the thread

I have posted this below in many places



You may want to understand what you read before commenting in threads.

 

[robdawg1]

STONE!!! My Goodness.....

 

[Stone]

answer the question TM

no......

.:24:

 

[Stone]

For your convenience here is the definition....as you obviously do not know the definition


con·done/kənˈdōn/
Verb:

Accept and allow (behavior that is considered morally wrong or offensive) to continue.
Approve or sanction (something), esp. with reluctance.

When I clearly have stated below



So how the fuck am I condoning torture when this is my official position?
I swear a preschooler could even see I am not condoning torture.

 

[The Man]

Also you said you would not condemn someone doing their job when it was legal?

"In 2007 it was reported that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was using waterboarding on extrajudicial prisoners and that the Department of Justice had authorized the procedure,[SUP][7][/SUP][SUP][8][/SUP] even though the United States government hanged Japanese soldiers for waterboarding US prisoners of war in World War II."

[SUP]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterboarding[/SUP]
[SUP]
You also made an argument that the guys were just doing their jobs but :

"The Court of Military Appeals held that "the justification for acts done pursuant to orders does not exist if the order was of such a nature that a man of ordinary sense and understanding would know it to be illegal.""
[SUP]http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/militarylaw1/a/obeyingorders.htm

so in conclusion, just because it was their job, does not make it right...[/SUP][/SUP]

I didnt ask if you would condemn the guards...I asked below

"Do you believe we should let any prisoner go that is tired of being confined."

so in conclusion, just because it was their job, does not make it right

But you went and ahead and responded with comparison above....which means you would be stating being a guard doesnt make it right.

But yet you already condoned torture by definition ...but yet say just because it is a job doesn't make it right.
Why not? you already condoned it{prison being torture}

 

[robdawg1]

I didnt ask if you would condemn the guards...I asked below

"Do you believe we should let any prisoner go that is tired of being confined."




But you went and ahead and responded with comparison above....which means you would be stating being a guard doesnt make it right.

But yet you already condoned torture by definition ...but yet say just because it is a job doesn't make it right.
Why not? you already condoned it{prison being torture}

prison is not torture

 

[robdawg1]

and that response was to your position condoning torture....