is actually a matter of legal opinionThats a matter of opinion, a baby is still a life and a baby regardless of how old it is.
is actually a matter of legal opinionThats a matter of opinion, a baby is still a life and a baby regardless of how old it is.
is actually a matter of legal opinion
Thats a matter of opinion, a baby is still a life and a baby regardless of how old it is.
true, but at that stage, no more so than a slug or something...
no it does not because so long as the law sits it cannot be legally wrong, you may argue morals till you are blue in the face but the law is the law until it is changedBecause the law never gets anything wrong, does it?
Personally I could never compare a slug to a human being in a rational sense. A slug dosen't grow up to be an intelligent human with emotions and morals, does it?
Just gonna throw this in here...
What if a couple..."not some irresponsible slut..who btw is not completely responsible for sexual happenings..keep it ya trousers unless u have a condom", where told that the child she was carrying would die at birth.
Would u think it humane to continue that pregnancy? And cause that child the further ordeal of child birth??
anti abortion groups are all women who are so fugly you wouldn't have sex with any of them with a stolen dick
I love how people spout off this stuff about it's the womans body and she can do what she wants with it. We're not talking about aborting the woman, we're talking about aborting a baby.
I also love the double standards of the far left who are against punishing mass murderers with the death penalty but for some strange reason think killing babies is ok.
I also disagree strongly that the man should have no say. It's his baby too. If I got a girl pregnant and she had an abortion against my wishes, she's a complete cunt for killing my child as far as I'm concerned and I could never forgive her.
no it does not because so long as the law sits it cannot be legally wrong, you may argue morals till you are blue in the face but the law is the law until it is changed
a slight sidetrack carry onI'm sorry, I must have got the wrong end of the stick about this thread. I thought it was to debate our personal feelings about abortion. Had we known it was just to state the law, I guess 99% of the posts in this thread should never have been made.
I was under the impression this was the debate section, not the state the law section.
A bunch of cells doesn't even have the required body parts to even feel pain - what's it missing if the cells don't feel anything?
exactlyI believe it's a States Rights issue, and if a state wants to make it legal, then that's fine with me, but I wouldn't live there.
Do you have proof of this? You're just a bunch of cells at the end of the day, too, you know.
Oh i agree , a life is a life, when that life actually begins is another matter.Even then, I'm still pro-life.
I'm a mother, I had the option of testing for Down's, Spina bifidia etc. We opted not to test, because the results would make no difference to us.
Miracle children are born every day... who am I to decide not to give a baby a chance to fight for life.
Interesting observation you have there.
I'll keep my observation to myself
:clap:clap:clap:clap
Do you have proof of this? You're just a bunch of cells at the end of the day, too, you know.
Yes but there are different types of cells and until it resembles anything likes a fetus or baby then it probably cannot feel pain. Pain requires a central nervous system and certain A fibres and C fibres and at least five different parts of the brain which they probably won't get until around the end of the first trimester anyway.
Kimmy is a LOT more than just a bunch of cells
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.