9/11 Attacks -- TOO CREEPY!

[Pudding Time]

But you don't have a single shred of solid evidence to prove the government was involved. And I doubt anyone ever will.

I accidently posted it under Elle's account so you may have missed this part:

And just for you info. I'm neither advocating that the government did or didn't, as I'm in no position to know all the facts.

 

[Pudding Time]

No, but it's certainly a step in the right direction :dunno

Maybe, maybe not.

 

[DavyBoy]

America's resident egotist wrote a very good piece on this whole thing

There is no 9/11 conspiracy you morons.

 

[Pudding Time]

America's resident egotist wrote a very good piece on this whole thing

There is no 9/11 conspiracy you morons.

Wow. I've been more enlightened by my 3 year old's jibberish language..

If people choose to believe one side over another due to that, then their mind was already made up before they read it.

 

[dt3]

Wow. I've been more enlightened by my 3 year old's jibberish language..

If people choose to believe one side over another due to that, then their mind was already made up before they read it.

It's a satire.

 

[DACS]

I dont know if anyone has already said this but most of the posted statement is entirely incorrect; this article explains why -

Q33 NY Wingdings Hoax - Elevens and the Wrath of the Eagle

 

[Pudding Time]

It's a satire.

Yet it shares quite similar sentiments as those who try to debunk 911 conspiracies.

 

[cubedrama]

Does sound coincidental, keep off the top floors.

 

[All Else Failed]

People still believe 9/11 was a conspiracy?

 

[Pudding Time]

People still believe 9/11 was a conspiracy?

People have facts that it wasn't?

 

[gLing]

This site has a lot.
Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage

 

[Pudding Time]

This site has a lot.
Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage

Nothing in there more damning than what's on the conspiracy websites.

 

[gLing]

Nothing in there more damning than what's on the conspiracy websites.

You obviously didn't read anything on there. lol


Here is an interesting video.


YouTube - 911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77

 

[Pudding Time]

gLing. There are both putting up claims with pretty good evidence. But neither one outweighs the other.

Plus there's nothing in there I haven't read before.

 

[gLing]

gLing. There are both putting up claims with pretty good evidence. But neither one outweighs the other.

Plus there's nothing in there I haven't read before.

It just thoroughly picks apart the conspiracy claims.

 

[Pudding Time]

It just thoroughly picks apart the conspiracy claims.

I don't believe so. It does sway my thoughts on some questions. But there are tons of other questions which it doesn't. Same with the conspiracies. They both make you think, which is great. But how someone can come to a conclusion with this stuff is beyond me.

 

[gLing]

I do have a question. I've read some theories that say those were not actually airliner planes hitting the buildings. If that is true than where are the missing passengers from those flights?

 

[SouthernTxGirl]

Interesting...

 

[Pudding Time]

Nothing like a 911 conspiracy thread to bring in new members

 

[SouthernTxGirl]

Nothing like a 911 conspiracy thread to bring in new members

:unsure: