Nah...
Even if there was enough evidence of his existence the last thing i'd do would be following him... like he deserves it, he just created us to play with us kinda...
Remember he can flip a switch and make you burn for eternity. Second thoughts?
Nah...
Even if there was enough evidence of his existence the last thing i'd do would be following him... like he deserves it, he just created us to play with us kinda...
:mad
I'm deeply shock that people still debate about the existence of god what the hack is wrong with you people
Before you start a debate, know this...
There is no scientific evidence for any diety. So scientifically speaking, you cannot believe.
Some people claim to be blessed with faith evidence that there is a God. Those people believe.
Science or faith. Choose your weapon. No one wins. No one convinces the other side. I hate to tell you, but that's a synopsis of an entire debate on the topic.
Depends. If you're talking about believing all of mankind came from one man and a woman then you're going to run into problems with science.I don`t think that it`s as simple as that, science is perfectly compatible with faith.
Its....in your holy book...That`s true, but that is not what Christians, muslims or jews neccesarily believe. Only people who read the holy scriptures litterarly would believe that. But Breath says that since there is no evidence for a diety you cannot believe in God and have an affection for science the same time. He says science or faith, choose your weapon. But you are right it depends on what you believe. But I think there doesn`t have to be a science or faith dilemma. Faith will always be able to exist alongside with sciense (if that`s correct English) the point of view people take on their faith is the only thing that will change as science progresses.
That`s true, but that is not what Christians, muslims or jews neccesarily believe. Only people who read the holy scriptures litterarly would believe that. But Breath says that since there is no evidence for a diety you cannot believe in God and have an affection for science the same time. He says science or faith, choose your weapon. But you are right it depends on what you believe. But I think there doesn`t have to be a science or faith dilemma. Faith will always be able to exist alongside with sciense (if that`s correct English) the point of view people take on their faith is the only thing that will change as science progresses.
Oxymoron alert.responsible faith
Faith is by definition irresponsible: it disregards our responsibility to use the common sense we have.
Nah...
Even if there was enough evidence of his existence the last thing i'd do would be following him... like he deserves it, he just created us to play with us kinda...
But i really dot bother thinking over it much.
With regard to those who say that there is no God, they just prove their narrow-mindedness by that statement alone. Where is the evidence that there IS no God? Any person who makes such an assumption is automatically incorrect because there's just no way he could possibly KNOW. Science can explain some things, depending what you choose to believe; Darwin or God, who knows? But even so, science itself is soooo primitive; like Thomas Edison said We don't know a millionth of one percent about anything.
No, Athiests don't believe in God, but Satanists more or less abhor the Christian religion and they follow the works of Anton Le Vey, who was pretty much the first 'Satanist'.
Yet with regard to science, we still know very very little, if you look at it from a wider perspective. How did we get here? What happens after we die? What's the cure for this disease, and that disease, etc etc. There's so much we don't know; put more faith in science? Why on earth should I when science has not found the answers to the questions that I'm asking. In that sense, Religion and Science are both in the same boat, and it comes down to a question of MY faith, and my personal belief, and personally I choose religion; sometimes the mind is powerful enough to be the foundation for your morals, what you choose to do, etc etc, and whether it's religion or science you follow, as I said it won't change anything with how you portray yourself to others as a decent, moralistic human being.
Standards? Are you talking about their beliefs and rules? Or are you talking about the way they conduct themselves?
Your quote- Satanists are decent human beings. I don't know that much about Satanists. What good standards do they promote? What I find interesting is that Satan appears to be part of the Christian belief system created by the Abrahamic religions. So if you believe in what is basically a Christian creation, don't you have to go along with what they say it is? (Satan- a rebellious fallen angel or demon that tempts humans to sin or commit evil deeds.) Hence my question about Satanist standards.Satanists, for example, reject the Christian church but they are some of the most intelligent, decent human beings you will ever come across; the name implies evil and cruelty but it's not the case.
With regard to Satanists, rather than worship Satan (because they don't actually worship Satan, and usually laugh if people suggest it) it's more that they believe in the 'realism' of things that they believe the bible and elsewhere tend to promote.
Are Satanists and Atheists the same thing?
Well, put it this way. Show me prove that there is NOT a god. Good luck.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.