I need to get me one them 1000 yard scopes. How more badass is it than a 500 yard scope?
What if you actually thought before you posted?
Why would anyone need a scope for 500 yards?
Don't give me that crap lol Your eyes, along with mine, aren't what they use to be.
I'm good out to about 300, but on a pie plate past that, I need some glass.
At least I'm honest![]()
It's like idiot fest with the gun freaks. Wonder what I could get for my Colt right now?
For example, under current laws the bureau is prohibited from creating a federal registry of gun transactions. So while detectives on television tap a serial number into a computer and instantly identify the buyer of a firearm, the reality could not be more different.
When law enforcement officers recover a gun and serial number, workers at the bureau’s National Tracing Center here — a windowless warehouse-style building on a narrow road outside town — begin making their way through a series of phone calls, asking first the manufacturer, then the wholesaler and finally the dealer to search their files to identify the buyer of the firearm.
About a third of the time, the process involves digging through records sent in by companies that have closed, in many cases searching by hand through cardboard boxes filled with computer printouts, hand-scrawled index cards or even water-stained sheets of paper.
The paranoid poster is wagging his finger. Here's some information you are apparently unaware of: the NRA is a lobby organization. The ATF is an official federal agency. A lobbying organization can't hamstring an official federal agency, though the reverse is definitely possible.
Your analogy doesn't match. Nobody tries to trace origins of the purchase of a pill. Are you under the impression that it would be possible if someone tried?
Why is it important to keep a computerized record of past owners of cars?
:24: and to prove it ==>Your response does not warrant a meaningful reply.
Lots of words and nothing said.My points sailed over your head or you just like arguing. What the heck do you think lobby groups do in Washington? You refuse to acknowledge that computerized data is better than info kept in a shoe box??? You're turning into a bitter old curmudgeon. Maybe you should take a break from OTZ, regain some good humor.![]()
:24: and to prove it ==>
Lots of words and nothing said.
It wouldn't matter what lobbyists do if you partisans would stop the status quo bullshit and start voting for people who aren't prepackaged and prepurchased. The fact remains that it is the legislators that vote to do any hamstringing, not the NRA. Lay the blame where it belongs.
Let me scrub the sarcasm off my question and rephrase.
Why do you think that computerized data would be important? And do try to actually answer the question instead of your typical rhetoric-filled non-answer.
It's either a right or it's not. No such thing as a mistaken right.It's your mistaken right to feel that computerized data has no role for gun registration/tracking.
Okay, now you're all butt-hurt because you can't answer the question.When you get ridiculous, I'll do my best to avoid engaging in your BS games.
It's either a right or it's not. No such thing as a mistaken right.
Okay, now you're all butt-hurt because you can't answer the question.
Why is it important to have a computerized record of who owns guns?
Again, you don't answer. Why post at all?You're a teacher right? Are you honestly trying to argue that when it comes to guns there is no place for computerized data and record keeping? Is this a unique position or do you feel this way in general regarding computerized data?
And yes, I'm becoming fatigued with your persistent bad mood.
Again, you don't answer. Why post at all?
Why do you think that computerized data would be important?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.