Why does the left see astroturf everywhere they look?

Users who are viewing this thread

  • 82
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

nova

Active Member
Messages
799
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Can't believe nobody wants to talk about astroturf. That was the topic of the day when average citizens were lambasting their elected reps at town hall meetings....
 

nova

Active Member
Messages
799
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
:24: :24: :24: :24: :24: :24: :24:

that's just made my day! has to be up there with the "liberal media" bias!

Don't bother looking at any of the supporting documentation. That would require a little bit of thought. Just keep pounding on a buzz word. That will make it a lot easier to continue being absolutely clueless... :24:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Don't bother looking at any of the supporting documentation. That would require a little bit of thought. Just keep pounding on a buzz word. That will make it a lot easier to continue being absolutely clueless... :24:

Don't bother to come back with any decent arguments, just head for the easy option, as usual... :24:
 

Francis

Sarcasm is me :)
Messages
8,367
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
2.08z
Can't believe nobody wants to talk about astroturf. That was the topic of the day when average citizens were lambasting their elected reps at town hall meetings....

That's because most places have gone back to natural turf and we just give a damn anymore... :24::24:
 

nova

Active Member
Messages
799
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Don't bother to come back with any decent arguments, just head for the easy option, as usual... :24:

Come up with something to argue against and I'll be happy to tear it apart, same as always my dear mixed up authoritarian anarcho socialist libertarian fascist statist ideologue. No way to make an argument against ridiculous snarky bullshit other than to point out how absolutely ignorant it is. :thumbup :24:
 

Francis

Sarcasm is me :)
Messages
8,367
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
2.08z
Come up with something to argue against and I'll be happy to tear it apart, same as always my dear mixed up authoritarian anarcho socialist libertarian fascist statist ideologue. No way to make an argument against ridiculous snarky bullshit other than to point out how absolutely ignorant it is. :thumbup :24:


I wonder if there is such a thing as left and right political views.. :24::24::24:
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Come up with something to argue against and I'll be happy to tear it apart, same as always my dear mixed up authoritarian anarcho socialist libertarian fascist statist ideologue. No way to make an argument against ridiculous snarky bullshit other than to point out how absolutely ignorant it is. :thumbup :24:

"authoritarian anarcho socialist libertarian fascist statist" - I like it. Might use that in future my government-minimalist-but-i-need-them-when-it-suits-me amigo.

There was simply no argument to be had - I was just laughing at what they wrote. Vast Liberal Conspiracy! It's hilarious! But if you need something to argue against, and we all know exactly how much you love to argue, how about this:

RightWingMoron said:
Fox News persists on covering news others don’t. It seems the “not really a news outlet” has uncovered a major scam by the Vast Leftwing Conspiracy:

Fox news covers what Rupert Murdoch tells them to with the sole goal of forwarding his own business interests. None of it is "news".

As for the "Vast Leftwing Conspiracy" - putting aside the fact that this simply DOES NOT EXIST, NEVER HAS EXISTED and NEVER WILL EXIST - please explain to me:

a) who the vast leftwing conspiracy is?
b) what its purpose is
c) for the love of God why do we even need to talk about something that exists solely in the mind of hard-right nutters?

The "article" you posted, I use quotations there because it barely passes as one, points to a conspiracy of left-wing people to produce what I suppose we could call propaganda to counter a movement that was totally and utterly fabricated by Fox News. To further their own selfish interests and counter a president based on the grounds of deep-seated racism. Do you not see that that is a case of the pot calling the kettle black?

If you honestly think the "tea Party" movement is grass roots, has clear rational political objectives, then please watch this video and if this doesn't change your mind then clearly you don't have a mind.

YouTube - 9.12 DC TEA PARTY - MARCH FOOTAGE WITH INTERVIEWS

RightWingPuppet said:
It seems that the Tea Party movement, once defamed and derided, now poses a threat to the liberal establishment, so much so that they are collecting millions to undermine it. Conservatives shouldn’t object to political speech — which this is. But there is certainly grounds to object to the chicanery, the lack of transparency, and the pretense that the opponents of the Tea Parties are themselves grassroots activists. They aren’t — this is Big Labor and assorted liberal-interest groups once again doing the bidding of the Democratic party. And if not for Fox, no one would be any the wiser.

Firstly - liberal establishment? What exactly is that supposed to mean? The entire US system is republican through and through - the media is owned, controlled and operated by businessmen, capitalist businessmen who most likely are republican. Where is this liberal establishment?

And I've never once heard any people criticising the tea parties and claiming themselves to be "grass roots"... this useless tosspot is just making crap up. Fox News is a joke to the rest of the world. Honestly, laughable. Painfully embarrassing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
Come up with something to argue against and I'll be happy to tear it apart, same as always my dear mixed up authoritarian anarcho socialist libertarian fascist statist ideologue. No way to make an argument against ridiculous snarky bullshit other than to point out how absolutely ignorant it is. :thumbup :24:

Your tearing mostly rings true to only others of like thinking. Big whoop. :)
 

nova

Active Member
Messages
799
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
"authoritarian anarcho socialist libertarian fascist statist" - I like it. Might use that in future my government-minimalist-but-i-need-them-when-it-suits-me amigo.

Sorry you don't like the fact that I point out you have no coherent position to speak of. I am and have always been 100% clear and consistent on my views of the nature and role of gov't ie to protect the life, liberty and property rights of individuals. I know thats hard for you to understand since you don't believe in any of those.

There was simply no argument to be had - I was just laughing at what they wrote. Vast Liberal Conspiracy! It's hilarious! But if you need something to argue against, and we all know exactly how much you love to argue, how about this:

I don't love arguing so much as making ignorant liberals look like the jackasses they are. :24:

Fox news covers what Rupert Murdoch tells them to with the sole goal of forwarding his own business interests. None of it is "news".

OOOH, a smelly opinion straight out of the asshole. :24:

As for the "Vast Leftwing Conspiracy" - putting aside the fact that this simply DOES NOT EXIST, NEVER HAS EXISTED and NEVER WILL EXIST - please explain to me:

a) who the vast leftwing conspiracy is?
b) what its purpose is
c) for the love of God why do we even need to talk about something that exists solely in the mind of hard-right nutters?

I saw that statement as more of a joke but if you need an answer

A. The "who" is the myriad of labor unions and liberal activist groups funneling tens of millions of dollars through multiple front groups in order to disguise the source to a single lawyer's office in order to counter groups of average american citizens.
B. Its purpose is to subvert the wishes of the American people, and subjugate them through a further expansion of the welfare state.
C. Because reasonable people who aren't left wing lunatics hell bent of shoving liberalism down people's throats recognize astroturfing when they see it.

Get off your feckless, lazy ass, go back to the article and click through the links to a very well respected open gov't group and see how the money is flowing your own goddamn self. I know its going to hurt your brain to think beyond the superficial but just go do it....

The "article" you posted, I use quotations there because it barely passes as one, points to a conspiracy of left-wing people to produce what I suppose we could call propaganda to counter a movement that was totally and utterly fabricated by Fox News. To further their own selfish interests and counter a president based on the grounds of deep-seated racism. Do you not see that that is a case of the pot calling the kettle black?

And that right there shows just how fucking ignorant you are. Totally and completely ignorant.

Arguing that citizens who spent their own time and money to organize, make signs and go to town halls, rallys in DC, etc etc etc are fabricated by a news organization and founded on racism is the ABSOLUTE DUMBEST FUCKING THING I HAVE EVER HEARD. Its also quite telling about you personally that you would bring such stupidity up.

If you honestly think the "tea Party" movement is grass roots, has clear rational political objectives, then please watch this video and if this doesn't change your mind then clearly you don't have a mind.

YouTube - 9.12 DC TEA PARTY - MARCH FOOTAGE WITH INTERVIEWS

I know what it is because I've had a fair amount of contact with one of my local ones. The one started and run by a house wife who had no interest in politics up until the past few years. There's no big scary backer organizing everything. People started talking about how fed the fuck up they were with the Fed gov't that it snowballed from there.

Why the fuck am I not surprised that a youtube video created by someone with a agenda constitutes proof to the little guy across the pond that can't figure out what he is.

Firstly - liberal establishment? What exactly is that supposed to mean? The entire US system is republican through and through - the media is owned, controlled and operated by businessmen, capitalist businessmen who most likely are republican. Where is this liberal establishment?

Thats really fucking funny because the media tried everything they could to discredit and destroy the movement. Up to and including using derogatory sexual terms to describe them (teabagger) and even open antagonism. If they're conservative own, run and controlled, well, they're not doing such a good job.

And I've never once heard any people criticising the tea parties and claiming themselves to be "grass roots"... this useless tosspot is just making crap up. Fox News is a joke to the rest of the world. Honestly, laughable. Painfully embarrassing.

Whats painfully embarrassing is you don't even seem to understand the meaning of "grass roots" and "astro turf." Nobody criticised them for being "grass roots" because thats the good one, the one where individuals come together to effect change from the bottom up. They were criticised for supposedly being "astroturf" ie fake grass, a fake effort made to look like it was coming from popular beginnings at the bottom.

The dear poster right below this statement was one of the one's screaming "astroturf" everytime something about them was mentioned.

Keep going and you'll be a joke to the rest of this site... wait, too late :24:

Your tearing mostly rings true to only others of like thinking. Big whoop. :)

And another incapable of making a logical coherent argument pops up. You guys have to band together when facts and logic tear you apart huh? :24:
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
making ignorant liberals...
OOOH, a smelly opinion straight out of the asshole. :24:
Get off your feckless, lazy ass...
fucking ignorant you are. Totally and completely ignorant.
ABSOLUTE DUMBEST FUCKING THING I HAVE EVER HEARD. Its also quite telling about you personally that you would bring such stupidity up.
And another incapable of making a logical coherent argument pops up. You guys have to band together when facts and logic tear you apart huh?

I'm sorry you cannot argue anything without hurling insults like a child. By all means, you use your "life, liberty and Property" excuse to justify your own personal greed, selfishness and complete disdain for your fellow man. I feel sorry for any human being that has to have any kind of relationship with you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Oh, and I will answer your points when I'm not on my phone - there's a lot to be said about everything you wrote. Roll on tomorrow, this gonna be fun :D
 

nova

Active Member
Messages
799
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
WAAAH! Quit pointing out how absolutely fucking ridiculous my ideas are!! Using facts and logic isn't fair!!! WAAAH!

By all means, you use your "life, liberty and Property" excuse to justify your own personal greed, selfishness and complete disdain for your fellow man.

You say greed, I say individual liberty. Your definition of "greed, selfishness and complete disdain for your fellow man" seems to be "He's doing things I don't like! I've got to stop him!"

I feel sorry for any human being that has to have any kind of relationship with you.

And I'm sad that people like you exist. Its a testament to how far we've come from the ideals of the enlightenment and its focus on the sanctity of the individual and fundamental rights of man. Its a prime indicator that we're well on our way back into slavery. Subjugated to a political class that restricts our every action for "the common good."
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Wow. I guess Pete's chomping on popcorn (or the British equivalent) waiting to see what kind of punishment gets doled out for this slugfest.
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Firstly, Nova, seeing as you don't understand a pretty simple philosophy, nor understand how flawed your own narrow beliefs are, watch this video, explains stuff pretty simply, nice and basic:

YouTube - Noam Chomsky: Wage Slavery = Chattle Slavery

Your idea of liberty is a little screwed up and massively over simplified - liberty as you wish cannot exist without equality. That's really the only difference between your beliefs and that of the true libertarians in the world. Oh, that and they don't want to be subjugated to a govt, no matter how minimal a govt that you propose.
 

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Firstly, Nova, seeing as you don't understand a pretty simple philosophy, nor understand how flawed your own narrow beliefs are, watch this video, explains stuff pretty simply, nice and basic:

Your idea of liberty is a little screwed up and massively over simplified - liberty as you wish cannot exist without equality. That's really the only difference between your beliefs and that of the true libertarians in the world. Oh, that and they don't want to be subjugated to a govt, no matter how minimal a govt that you propose.
Your idea of equality is really screwed up. Equality of outcome is not equality.

Why is it that people who want to demonize success reference people who've made millions demonizing success?

Hoover Institution - Hoover Digest - Noam Chomsky, Closet Capitalist

A few years back he [Chomsky] went to Boston’s venerable white-shoe law firm, Palmer and Dodge, and, with the help of a tax attorney specializing in “income-tax planning,” set up an irrevocable trust to protect his assets from Uncle Sam. He named his tax attorney (every socialist radical needs one!) and a daughter as trustees. To the Diane Chomsky Irrevocable Trust (named for another daughter) he has assigned the copyright of several of his books, including multiple international editions.

Chomsky favors the estate tax and massive income redistribution—just not the redistribution of his income. No reason to let radical politics get in the way of sound estate planning.



When I challenged Chomsky about his trust, he suddenly started to sound very bourgeois: “I don’t apologize for putting aside money for my children and grandchildren,” he wrote in one e-mail. Chomsky offered no explanation for why he condemns others who are equally proud of their provision for their children and who try to protect their assets from Uncle Sam. Although he did say that the tax shelter is okay because he and his family are “trying to help suffering people.”
Chomsky’s marketing efforts shortly after September 11 give new meaning to the term war profiteer. In the days after the tragedy, he raised his speaking fee from $9,000 to $12,000 because he was suddenly in greater demand.
In October 2002, radicals gathered in Philadelphia for a benefit entitled “Noam Chomsky: Media and Democracy.” Sponsored by the Greater Philadelphia Democratic Left, for a fee of $15 you could attend the speech and hear the great man ruminate on the evils of capitalism. For another $35, you could attend a post-talk reception and he would speak directly with you.



During the speech, Chomsky told the assembled crowd, “A democracy requires a free, independent, and inquiring media.” After the speech, Deborah Bolling, a writer for the lefty Philadelphia City Paper, tried to get an interview with Chomsky. She was turned away. To talk to Chomsky, she was told, this “free, independent, and inquiring” reporter needed to pay $35 to get into the private reception.
 

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Your idea of equality is really screwed up. Equality of outcome is not equality.

Why is it that people who want to demonize success reference people who've made millions demonizing success?

Hoover Institution - Hoover Digest - Noam Chomsky, Closet Capitalist

what's he supposed to do with his money?

he criticizes the system that allows the massive disparity in wealth between the rich and poor, I've never heard him directly attack any one individual for simply being rich. I could be wrong on that, but I've read and watched a lot of Chomsky over the years. He doesn't have a problem, and neither do I, with people acquiring more than the next man - the problem lies in how's it's achieved, ie through exploitation or through fair means. There is nothing in anarchist belief that says people shouldn't be able to keep what they earn. There are socialists out there that do believe in equality of outcome, I'm not one of them, and I don't believe Chomksy is either.

Equality of outcome is a misunderstanding - the main drive socialism is at the other end of the spectrum, equality in starting point. The theory going that it would make things fairer at the outcome stage, but not necessarily equal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

edgray

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,214
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I see your point entirely. But he understand the system and that if he didn't do that, his kids would be at a disadvantage. We do live in a capitalist world, I don't think there's anything wrong with what he's done in the confines of our current model, and providing for ones own is quite admirable - it's not like he's made millions by underpaying people or anything like that, and his contribution to society, whether you agree or not, is valuable.
 
78,875Threads
2,185,391Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top