LMAO, I like toying around with you guys.
exactly... you can't back up what you're saying, so you deflect, and do whatever you can to avoid answering direct questions.
LMAO, I like toying around with you guys.
I am not a good debater though. I was bashed up here when I was a newbie but I picled up a little bit of skill along the way.Maybe we should nominate Kelvin for a Nobel Prize in debate?
I second that!Maybe we should nominate Kelvin for a Nobel Prize in debate?
And that'll do for the nomination package.I am not a good debater though. I was bashed up here when I was a newbie but I picled up a little bit of skill along the way.
A lot of you guys here are suffering from Obama Derangement Syndrome.
The acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the statements -- nay -- the very existence of Barack Obama.
Obama's positions better reflect the change and new direction that the American people have been calling for, but those with Obama Derangement Syndrome would rather stick with failure than even consider voting for him.
I did not coin the term btw.
I been completely pathetic here since day oneyou're completely pathetic
Yeah, just like what the Noble committe did for obama and then you guys cry foul.
Some on Nobel Peace panel reluctant on Obama: report | Politics | ReutersVG said one of the newly elected members, Aagot Valle from the Socialist Left Party, had strong objections to giving the prize to Obama. "I had expected a debate, especially around the issues I find problematic, the war in Afghanistan," Valle told daily Bergens Tidende earlier this week.
Inger-Marie Ytterhorn, a former member of parliament for the opposition right-wing Progress Party, believed it was too early for Obama to win the prize, according to the paper.
Kaci Kullman Five, the Conservative Party's leader from 1991-94, also voiced opinions against the decision, VG said.
A lot of you guys here are suffering from Obama Derangement Syndrome.
The acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the statements -- nay -- the very existence of Barack Obama.
Obama's positions better reflect the change and new direction that the American people have been calling for, but those with Obama Derangement Syndrome would rather stick with failure than even consider voting for him.
I did not coin the term btw.
I am not a good debater though.
You guys getting too serious here. Chill out man.
LMAO ...you getting too perturbed with the so called insults?you're the one throwing out insults right and left, accusing people of being mindless drones who are incapable of independent thought. Oh, and you were once again unable to back up any of your points with fact, resorting instead to anecdotes and complete untruths. You're also incapable of refuting hard facts either.
oh so he's just an idiot then, OK.» Columnist & Associate Editor | Eugene Robinson is an Associate Editor and twice-weekly columnist for The Washington Post. His column appears on Tuesdays and Fridays.
In a 25-year career at The Post, Robinson has been city hall reporter, city editor, foreign correspondent in Buenos Aires and London, foreign editor, and assistant managing editor in charge of the paper’s award-winning Style section. In 2005, he started writing a column for the Op-Ed page. He is the author of "Coal to Cream: A Black Man’s Journey Beyond Color to an Affirmation of Race" (1999) and "Last Dance in Havana" (2004).
Source: archive | Staff | washingtonpost.com
no see he doesn't deserve the award mainly because he hasn't done anything to warrant it. Bring proud of that makes no sense.I really dont understand you guys. If I am an american I would be proud of my president and my country if my president wins a Nobel prize be it for peace or otherwise even if there is no merit in the award.
no see he doesn't deserve the award mainly because he hasn't done anything to warrant it. Bring proud of that makes no sense.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.