Should be no problem then to show these findings
"Findings"? lol, this is exactly what I mean. One cannot rely on one or even five "studies" to proclaim they know anything about homosexuality, or anything else. I have to laugh when people run off on these forums like they know anything about the subject because they found something online that says this or that. That's not how it works.
Human sexuality is a vastly complicated and intricate thing, my exposure to the topic comes from the upwards of 7 years of education, which, in this field counts for nothing. I am but a mere spectator of the humanities, with only a small understanding of the scope of human sexuality. There are thousands of studies and statistics; they conflict, they coordinate, they are redone and re-interpreted. Most of them are completely fucking useless and incredibly biased, but there are certain assumptions given a consensus.
Social science (which is shaky anyway) compiles decades worth of knowledge into a set of assumptions that are even too long to go into here. It's been classically difficult to get unbiased data and information about sexuality, because humans are still so influenced by dogma which skews the perception of sexuality one way or another. And you want "findings"
I can't offer you those, but the more you educate yourself, the more you read and learn and glean, the better. Be an autodidact.
