Vietnam War: Facts, Stats & Myths

Users who are viewing this thread

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Credit: Capt. Marshal Hanson, USNR (Ret.)
and Capt. Scott Beaton, Statistical Source


9,087,000 military personnel served on active duty during the official Vietnam era from August 5, 1964 to May 7, 1975.
2,709,918 Americans served in uniform in Vietnam.
Vietnam Veterans represented 9.7% of their generation.
240 men were awarded the Medal of Honor during the Vietnam War.
The first man to die in Vietnam was James Davis, in 1958. He was with the 509th Radio Research Station. Davis Station in Saigon was named for him.
58,148 were killed in Vietnam.
75,000 were severely disabled.
23,214 were 100% disabled.
5,283 lost limbs.
1,081 sustained multiple amputations.
Of those killed, 61% were younger than 21.
11,465 of those killed were younger than 20 years old.
Of those killed, 17,539 were married.
Average age of men killed: 23.1 years.
Five men killed in Vietnam were only 16 years old.
The oldest man killed was 62 years old.
As of January 15, 2004, there are 1,875 Americans still unaccounted for from the Vietnam War.
97% of Vietnam Veterans were honorably discharged.
91% of Vietnam Veterans say they are glad they served.
74% say they would serve again, even knowing the outcome.
Vietnam veterans have a lower unemployment rate than the same non-vet age groups.
Vietnam veterans' personal income exceeds that of our non-veteran age group by more than 18 percent.
87% of Americans hold Vietnam Veterans in high esteem.
There is no difference in drug usage between Vietnam Veterans and non-Vietnam Veterans of the same age group (Source: Veterans Administration Study).
Vietnam Veterans are less likely to be in prison - only one-half of one percent of Vietnam Veterans have been jailed for crimes.
85% of Vietnam Veterans made successful transitions to civilian life.

Common Myths Dispelled:
Myth: Common belief is that most Vietnam veterans were drafted.
Fact: 2/3 of the men who served in Vietnam were volunteers. 2/3 of the men who served in World War II were drafted. Approximately 70% of those killed in Vietnam were volunteers.
Myth: The media have reported that suicides among Vietnam veterans range from 50,000 to 100,000 - 6 to 11 times the non-Vietnam veteran population.
Fact: Mortality studies show that 9,000 is a better estimate. "The CDC Vietnam Experience Study Mortality Assessment showed that during the first 5 years after discharge, deaths from suicide were 1.7 times more likely among Vietnam veterans than non-Vietnam veterans. After that initial post-service period, Vietnam veterans were no more likely to die from suicide than non-Vietnam veterans. In fact, after the 5-year post-service period, the rate of suicides is less in the Vietnam veterans' group.
Myth: Common belief is that a disproportionate number of blacks were killed in the Vietnam War.
Fact: 86% of the men who died in Vietnam were Caucasians, 12.5% were black, 1.2% were other races. Sociologists Charles C. Moskos and John Sibley Butler, in their recently published book "All That We Can Be," said they analyzed the claim that blacks were used like cannon fodder during Vietnam "and can report definitely that this charge is untrue. Black fatalities amounted to 12 percent of all Americans killed in Southeast Asia, a figure proportional to the number of blacks in the U.S. population at the time and slightly lower than the proportion of blacks in the Army at the close of the war."
Myth: Common belief is that the war was fought largely by the poor and uneducated.
Fact: Servicemen who went to Vietnam from well-to-do areas had a slightly elevated risk of dying because they were more likely to be pilots or infantry officers. Vietnam Veterans were the best educated forces our nation had ever sent into combat. 79% had a high school education or better.
Myth: The common belief is the average age of an infantryman fighting in Vietnam was 19.
Fact: Assuming KIAs accurately represented age groups serving in Vietnam, the average age of an infantryman (MOS 11B) serving in Vietnam to be 19 years old is a myth, it is actually 22. None of the enlisted grades have an average age of less than 20. The average man who fought in World War II was 26 years of age.
Myth: The common belief is that the domino theory was proved false.
Fact: The domino theory was accurate. The ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) countries, Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand stayed free of Communism because of the U.S. commitment to Vietnam. The Indonesians threw the Soviets out in 1966 because of America's commitment in Vietnam. Without that commitment, Communism would have swept all the way to the Malacca Straits that is south of Singapore and of great strategic importance to the free world. If you ask people who live in these countries that won the war in Vietnam, they have a different opinion from the American news media. The Vietnam War was the turning point for Communism.
Myth: The common belief is that the fighting in Vietnam was not as intense as in World War II.
Fact: The average infantryman in the South Pacific during World War II saw about 40 days of combat in four years. The average infantryman in Vietnam saw about 240 days of combat in one year thanks to the mobility of the helicopter. One out of every 10 Americans who served in Vietnam was a casualty. 58,148 were killed and 304,000 wounded out of 2.7 million who served. Although the percent that died is similar to other wars, amputations or crippling wounds were 300 percent higher than in World War II. 75,000 Vietnam veterans are severely disabled. MEDEVAC helicopters flew nearly 500,000 missions. Over 900,000 patients were airlifted (nearly half were American). The average time lapse between wounding to hospitalization was less than one hour. As a result, less than one percent of all Americans wounded, who survived the first 24 hours, died. The helicopter provided unprecedented mobility. Without the helicopter it would have taken three times as many troops to secure the 800 mile border with Cambodia and Laos (the politicians thought the Geneva Conventions of 1954 and the Geneva Accords or 1962 would secure the border).
Myth: Kim Phuc, the little nine year old Vietnamese girl running naked from the napalm strike near Trang Bang on 8 June 1972 (shown a million times on American television) was burned by Americans bombing Trang Bang.
Fact: No American had involvement in this incident near Trang Bang that burned Phan Thi Kim Phuc. The planes doing the bombing near the village were VNAF (Vietnam Air Force) and were being flown by Vietnamese pilots in support of South Vietnamese troops on the ground. The Vietnamese pilot who dropped the napalm in error is currently living in the United States. Even the AP photographer, Nick Ut, who took the picture, was Vietnamese. The incident in the photo took place on the second day of a three day battle between the North Vietnamese Army (NVA) who occupied the village of Trang Bang and the ARVN (Army of the Republic of Vietnam) who were trying to force the NVA out of the village. Recent reports in the news media that an American commander ordered the air strike that burned Kim Phuc are incorrect. There were no Americans involved in any capacity. "We (Americans) had nothing to do with controlling VNAF," according to Lieutenant General (Ret) James F. Hollingsworth, the Commanding General of TRAC at that time. Also, it has been incorrectly reported that two of Kim Phuc's brothers were killed in this incident. They were Kim's cousins not her brothers.
Myth: The United States lost the war in Vietnam.
Fact: The American military was not defeated in Vietnam. The American military did not lose a battle of any consequence. From a military standpoint, it was almost an unprecedented performance. General Westmoreland quoting Douglas Pike (a professor at the University of California, Berkeley), a major military defeat for the VC and NVA.
 
  • 113
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
The United States Did Not Lose The War In Vietnam, The South Vietnamese Did. Read On...
The fall of Saigon happened 30 April 1975, two years AFTER the American military left Vietnam. The last American troops departed in their entirety 29 March 1973.
How could we lose a war we had already stopped fighting? We fought to an agreed stalemate. The peace settlement was signed in Paris on 27 January 1973. It called for release of all U.S. prisoners, withdrawal of U.S. forces, limitation of both sides' forces inside South Vietnam and a commitment to peaceful reunification. The 140,000 evacuees in April 1975 during the fall of Saigon consisted almost entirely of civilians and Vietnamese military, NOT American military running for their lives. There were almost twice as many casualties in Southeast Asia (primarily Cambodia) the first two years after the fall of Saigon in 1975 than there were during the ten years the U.S. was involved in Vietnam. Thanks for the perceived loss and the countless assassinations and torture visited upon Vietnamese, Laotians, and Cambodians goes mainly to the American media and their undying support-by-misrepresentation of the anti-War movement in the United States. As with much of the Vietnam War, the news media misreported and misinterpreted the 1968 Tet Offensive. It was reported as an overwhelming success for the Communist forces and a decided defeat for the U.S. forces. Nothing could be further from the truth. Despite initial victories by the Communists forces, the Tet Offensive resulted in a major defeat of those forces. General Vo Nguyen Giap, the designer of the Tet Offensive, is considered by some as ranking with Wellington, Grant, Lee and MacArthur as a great commander. Still, militarily, the Tet Offensive was a total defeat of the Communist forces on all fronts. It resulted in the death of some 45,000 NVA troops and the complete, if not total destruction of the Viet Cong elements in South Vietnam. The Organization of the Viet Cong Units in the South never recovered. The Tet Offensive succeeded on only one front and that was the News front and the political arena. This was another example in the Vietnam War of an inaccuracy becoming the perceived truth. However, inaccurately reported, the News Media made the Tet Offensive famous.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
well one thing is for sure, it was a very taxing war on everyone living in that era.

One thing I don't get when people say we won Vietnam....what exactly made us victorious in that war?
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Gotta read it first. ;)

"Myth: The common belief is that the domino theory was proved false.
Fact: The domino theory was accurate. The ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) countries, Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand stayed free of Communism because of the U.S. commitment to Vietnam. The Indonesians threw the Soviets out in 1966 because of America's commitment in Vietnam. Without that commitment, Communism would have swept all the way to the Malacca Straits that is south of Singapore and of great strategic importance to the free world. If you ask people who live in these countries that won the war in Vietnam, they have a different opinion from the American news media. The Vietnam War was the turning point for Communism."
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
WOW! That is awesome. That makes me proud to live in the country I live in :)

Dude, doesn't it though. Me too. :)

can we get the link to the site you got this from?
LOL You don't trust my sources?
http://www.uswings.com/vietnamfacts.asp

ok...tell me....does the united states recognise vietnam as a country yet?

Yes, we're getting to be on better terms every year. We've started doing quite a bit of trade with them lately, and I know they let R. Lee into the country to do an hour and a half episode of Mail Call. Ohh Rah!! :D
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Dude, doesn't it though. Me too. :)


LOL You don't trust my sources?
http://www.uswings.com/vietnamfacts.asp



Yes, we're getting to be on better terms every year. We've started doing quite a bit of trade with them lately, and I know they let R. Lee into the country to do an hour and a half episode of Mail Call. Ohh Rah!! :D
Its not that I don't trust you, its just strange to just list numbers and say they're fact without a source. Even with your source I quesiton how exactly he got these numbers? Did he go out and ask every single vet how they felt about the war?
 

HisHoliness

Banned
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
He loses me right around where he stops stating figures and starts declaring his opinion as truth, and certainly everything I've read as myth. Like AEF says, he doesn't back any of it up. I mean, his first hand experience is probably pretty clouded. And other than that, he's relying purely on secondary sources.

There's an old adage that soldiers make shitty historians. And it is pretty ridiculous when he claims that the U.S. didn't lose. The NVA met their goals, which means we lost, no matter how many technicalities he wants to bring up.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Got to admit its the first time I've ever heard of Vietnam being a success and a war which the US won!:confused I guess its all about spin, its possible to manipulate and interpret a lot of figured to show what you want them to show. Blair's government with all their spin doctors, over here, were brilliant at doing that!
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
He loses me right around where he stops stating figures and starts declaring his opinion as truth, and certainly everything I've read as myth. Like AEF says, he doesn't back any of it up. I mean, his first hand experience is probably pretty clouded. And other than that, he's relying purely on secondary sources.

There's an old adage that soldiers make shitty historians. And it is pretty ridiculous when he claims that the U.S. didn't lose. The NVA met their goals, which means we lost, no matter how many technicalities he wants to bring up.
A lot of the numbers look a bit high to me.


These are the ones that I find most strange:

91% of Vietnam Veterans say they are glad they served.
74% say they would serve again, even knowing the outcome.



Unless he went to every vet and interviewed them, his data is false.
 
N

NightWarrior

Guest
A lot of the numbers look a bit high to me.


These are the ones that I find most strange:

91% of Vietnam Veterans say they are glad they served.
74% say they would serve again, even knowing the outcome.



Unless he went to every vet and interviewed them, his data is false.

Since when is any statistics correct? You take a sampling, say 1000 soldiers. Its no different then the statistics for Presidential approval.

Also, why is it so hard for people to understand that the media reports things inaccurately all the time? They distort the truth to get ratings.

Also, no where did it say the US won the war. It said we agreed to pull troops because we were at a stalemate. I'm 100% sure that if the politicians would have let the military fight our kind of War, this war would have been over in less than a year.
 

HisHoliness

Banned
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Since when is any statistics correct? You take a sampling, say 1000 soldiers. Its no different then the statistics for Presidential approval.

Also, why is it so hard for people to understand that the media reports things inaccurately all the time? They distort the truth to get ratings.

Also, no where did it say the US won the war. It said we agreed to pull troops because we were at a stalemate. I'm 100% sure that if the politicians would have let the military fight our kind of War, this war would have been over in less than a year.


Remember, 83% of statistics are made up. :p I wasn't really hung up on the statistics he posted. It was the Fact and Myth segment that didn't add up to me.

I wouldn't consider the end of the Vietnam Conflict a stalemate, that's just this guys spin on the issue. Now let me add my spin.

Lets define victory as the completion of your goals in battle, rather than the all out annihilation of your opponent. And lets also assume that, since two groups are in conflict, their goals must naturally be in contra position to each other. If you can agree with this, read further.

In the end, North Vietnam must have completed their goals, since - and correct me if I'm wrong - they are still a communist state. Therefore, using the logic stated above, upon completion of NV goals, the US has necessarily lost. Now if this soldier wants to blame the loss on the South Vietnamese Army, people, or the US media, that's fine. The end result is the same.
 
N

NightWarrior

Guest
Remember, 83% of statistics are made up. :p I wasn't really hung up on the statistics he posted. It was the Fact and Myth segment that didn't add up to me.

I wouldn't consider the end of the Vietnam Conflict a stalemate, that's just this guys spin on the issue. Now let me add my spin.

Lets define victory as the completion of your goals in battle, rather than the all out annihilation of your opponent. And lets also assume that, since two groups are in conflict, their goals must naturally be in contra position to each other. If you can agree with this, read further.

In the end, North Vietnam must have completed their goals, since - and correct me if I'm wrong - they are still a communist state. Therefore, using the logic stated above, upon completion of NV goals, the US has necessarily lost. Now if this soldier wants to blame the loss on the South Vietnamese Army, people, or the US media, that's fine. The end result is the same.


Your logic is flawed. The goal of the US was to stop the North Vietnamese from invading and occupying South Vietnam. So, in my opinion, the US has won.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,388Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top