'Under God' Issue Back in Court

Users who are viewing this thread

  • 79
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Personally I think having God in it makes a mockery of it and makes it meaningless. Is someone athiest is forced to say America is a country under God if they don't believe in God, what's the point? Its the same as all this swearing on the Bible shit in court. What's the point in me doing it if I think the Bible is a pile of shit?
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
Is someone athiest is forced to say America is a country under God if they don't believe in God, what's the point?
I've never seen somebody forced to say the Under God part. All they have to do, if they don't believe it, is not say it! It's isn't hard, just quit talking at that part, and start again after it.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
I've never seen somebody forced to say the Under God part. All they have to do, if they don't believe it, is not say it! It's isn't hard, just quit talking at that part, and start again after it.

Ah, never realised that. Well if that's the case, I really don't see what the problem is.:confused
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
It violates the constitution. The government can't establish or endorse religion or any deity, yet we have reference to a deity in our pledge.
It says they can't establish a religion. You're adding the deity part yourself. A belief in god isn't religion.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
if you want to believe that, you can. But, I really don't think when they put it in the pledge, they were thinking of some sort of vague, universal deity.
 

BadBoy@TheWheel

DT3's Twinkie
Messages
20,999
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.06z
if you want to believe that, you can. But, I really don't think when they put it in the pledge, they were thinking of some sort of vague, universal deity.


Amazing this thread is still rolling, I thought this was pretty much beaten up by us, however, I still do not see the harm.

I mean, it's the best of both worlds if you ask me. If your atheist, then the word God can't bother you because according to Atheist doctrine, he doesn't actually exist.

If you do think that a God of some sort exists, then it can be like a mad lib, fill in whatever you want to call "God"

If your atheist how can you feel imposed on by something you don't even think is there?

I still say that removing that word does not progress our nation one iota, how about a prescription drug plan for seniors, how about taking care of our veterans for once, ending hunger, making peace with other nations. Picking the Constitution apart does nothing to advance us, only seperate us further as a nation.

Really simple to me.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Amazing this thread is still rolling, I thought this was pretty much beaten up by us, however, I still do not see the harm.

I mean, it's the best of both worlds if you ask me. If your atheist, then the word God can't bother you because according to Atheist doctrine, he doesn't actually exist.

If you do think that a God of some sort exists, then it can be like a mad lib, fill in whatever you want to call "God"

If your atheist how can you feel imposed on by something you don't even think is there?

I still say that removing that word does not progress our nation one iota, how about a prescription drug plan for seniors, how about taking care of our veterans for once, ending hunger, making peace with other nations. Picking the Constitution apart does nothing to advance us, only seperate us further as a nation.

Really simple to me.
Its not even about my belief that there is no god, its simply a constitutional problem to me.
 

BadBoy@TheWheel

DT3's Twinkie
Messages
20,999
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.06z
Uh, no. I don't think I'm being forcefully converted, nor do I know of any atheists that think that either, and I know a lot.


Then there should be no issue then. Removing the word does not make the idea go away any more than leaving it makes it real.

I just think folks have run out of any real band wagon, this is popular right now.

But I have been hearing it for years. I'm over it:p
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Then there should be no issue then. Removing the word does not make the idea go away any more than leaving it makes it real.

I just think folks have run out of any real band wagon, this is popular right now.

But I have been hearing it for years. I'm over it:p
I'm arguing purely on constitutional principle of the fact that its presence in the pledge is illegal.

Then again, I think the pledge itself is pretty silly so idk I'm getting tired of talking about it. :p
 
78,875Threads
2,185,390Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top