this is a two part question, isn't it?So your contention is that Hussein and Iraq are damn near synonymous and that gives liberals the right to totally distort the truth? :confused
:24:
the first part is about the synonym
it's not a contention, fox....i know you conservative types have poor memories, and are constantly relying on your pundits to remind you of what actually happened in the past....but surely your memory goes back 7 years....in your case, maybe 7 years, and a week, just to be safe....when somebody mentioned iraq, what was the first thing that popped into your head?
be honest.
as a population, i'd guess it looked something like this
iran: less than 5%
wmd: around 20%
oil: around 15%
kuwait: around 10%
hussein: around 50%
islam, al queda, other terms "hotboxed" by 911: less than 1%
if somebody mentioned husseiin, i'd guess it was
iraq: 55%
kuwait; 30%
wmd: 15%
islam, al queda, etc: 0%
thye're just my quesses, of course, and don't prove anything....so you can laugh 'em off.....but the excuse is not contrived...the "total distortion of the truth" arguement is bogus
but i'll grant you that one choice of wording has political advantages over the other....works both ways, tho, now.....don't it? :ninja
nobody's making that claim....THAT's contrived, for ya!!!So I guess Bush and the United States are synonymous? Or Blair and the UK?