I read the article, and it was a painful read.
I understand what the author was trying to convey, but the piece was very poorly written.
I completely disagree with his premise that science does not allow for consciousness. The author attempts to prove this by breaking down the brain to its simplest function/processes (electromagnetic) then comparing them to something as simple as a light bulb. Arguing that a light bulb cannot have consciousness thus our brain cannot achieve consciousness...
Based on this line of reasoning, one can say that an acorn could never grow to a might oak tree since the laws of physics apply equally to the acorn and the light bulb...