Should Circumcision be banned?

Should Circumcision Be Banned?

  • Total voters
    15
Just because they don't have the same rights as an adult doesn't mean they don't have any. If parents never abused the rights of their children then we wouldn't need laws to protect children. Unfortunately that's not the case.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, there are parents that abuse their children, and those parents are not acting in the best interest of their child, if you KNOW for a fact that there is child abuse going on then it is your duty to notify the authorities, Circumcision however is NOT child abuse, it is a legitimate medical procedure performed by legitimate doctors. IMHO.
 
I was circumcised. My son wasn't because he had a condition called Hypospadis (sp?) and he had to have full blown surgery to correct some issues with the way his formed. Post surgery it was as it should have been and looked like any other circumcised penis.
 
Circumcision is actually much safer and probably better to do when the child is older. I think the child should have the right to choose if they want it done.
I would hate to think my parents took something of mine away from me without my consent at a time when I am most vulnerable. Then to find you don't even believe in the shit that goes with the ritual. How rude.
 
BornReady said:
Just because they don't have the same rights as an adult doesn't mean they don't have any. If parents never abused the rights of their children then we wouldn't need laws to protect children. Unfortunately that's not the case.
Click to expand...
At the age a child should have the procedure done the child doesn't even ave the capacity to know what the fuck rights are. I agree 100% with DK.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
IF circumcision undermines women right in any way it should be banned.
After all a man's willie is held in trust by a man for a woman (or women?) and if she doesn't enjoy a ' cutpiece ' the cutting ought to be done away with.

However, one bad thing with uncircumcised thingie is that it is more susceptible to 'premature ejaculation''... who would like to differ??
 
Dana said:
apparently people are going to have their opinions and there's no real use "debating" over this.
Click to expand...
It's a discussion, not a debate. There's always a point to both. If it wasn't done here you might as well shut the joint down because all that would happen is the op would make a thread and that would be the end of it if we followed your logic.
 
circumcision does not reduce the dimensions of the thingie nor does it reduce the arousal so I think nothing wrong with having a little foreskin cut unless it tends to 'step over women rights'?:)
Wonder how women take it??
 
Back
Top