Poll! Debbie Rowe wants her children back

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
P

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
skyblue said:
and whos offspring did that?
Click to expand...

His mum is now seperated from his dad who seems to be the fuckface in the kids upbringing. The mum actually seems pretty ok other than defending MJ which is probably to be expected, seeing he was her son. I'll leave it to the courts to decide when the real facts come out though. :nod:
 
  • 51
    Replies
  • 725
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list
RedRyder

RedRyder

Gimme Some Heat!
Messages
30,329
Reaction score
33
Tokenz
0.01z
Tangerine said:
As a biological parent, she'll have rights to her children unless she's deemed unfit by the courts. Full custody? Maybe not. But I can't see where a 79 year old woman is a better option than their own mother.

Blood tends to always trump everything else when it comes to children.
Click to expand...

...... unless one has a buttload of money ...... :willy_nilly:
 
Goat Whisperer

Goat Whisperer

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
*hasn't read anything else*

MJ put in his will that his Grandma should have custody and put in especially that his Ex-Wife should NOT. And hten a family friend if the grandma wasn't capable...

I think that if the grandma isn't capable, then they kids should have some sort of say in it. If they want their biological mom, then yes I geuss...
 
Alien Allen

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
AbriannaPeto said:
*hasn't read anything else*

MJ put in his will that his Grandma should have custody and put in especially that his Ex-Wife should NOT. And hten a family friend if the grandma wasn't capable...

I think that if the grandma isn't capable, then they kids should have some sort of say in it. If they want their biological mom, then yes I geuss...
Click to expand...
The kids are too young to have too much say though.

I think this is going to boil down to the legalities. And once the courts get a hold of this matter then it boils down to who has the best,, ergo, the most expensive lawyers. Unless Jackson paid off the ex in huge sums and she has that to use then she probably will lose on a custody battle. She mayl get some visitation and maybe some small joint custody if the Jackson family accepts that. Which raises the question as to if Jacksons mother ever has expressed opinions about the ex in the past
 
Alien Allen

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
AbriannaPeto said:
Was the bio mom even really in there lives before?

lol and I said it SHOULD be that way... not that it will be :(
Click to expand...

Only the first couple years. Nothing since as I recall. Never meant to infer you said it should be that way. I was just saying that given her signing an agreement that it will be tough for her to have much say.
 
Tangerine

Tangerine

Slightly Acidic
Messages
3,679
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I would be willing to bet that she gets some type of at least partial custody.

Her divorce settlement agreement kept her away from the kids - MJ's choice - not hers. I would be surprised if that is used against her for "not being in the kids lives." I know every state has different laws, but I have a close friend who's a lawyer dealing primarily in family law. She tells me that biology almost always overrides any legal papers or agreements. (wills, divorces, etc) For her to be denied any custody, someone would have to prove that she is unfit to be a parent. Especially if it comes out that the kids are NOT MJ's biologically - in which case no one in the Jackson family would have any legal claim to them.
 
M

Margene

Member
Messages
10,191
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Dakota Jim said:
She says she is the natural mother of two of the Jackson children and will take DNA tests to prove it. She is also willing totake psychological tests.

If she proves maternity, should she gain custody??
Click to expand...

No. Twice she has legally disowned them and received money. Initially she said she has had nothing to do with them and she had them for MJ, not herself. She is after a third pay check.
 
P

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Well she's obviously a bitch but there's less chance of that than MJ being a kiddie fiddler. I'm just sick of not being able to get away from people mourning a nonce. If there is any such thing as society, I really dont want a part of it if it means people not shutting up about and getting angry with you because you dont like paedophiles.
 
Alien Allen

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
Peter Parka said:
Well she's obviously a bitch but there's less chance of that than MJ being a kiddie fiddler. I'm just sick of not being able to get away from people mourning a nonce. If there is any such thing as society, I really dont want a part of it if it means people not shutting up about and getting angry with you because you dont like paedophiles.
Click to expand...
I think at this somber time we all need to think back to the wonderful things he did for all of us. :D
 
C

cam elle toe

Banned BY User's Request
Messages
17,794
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
My 2 cents worth
I think she deserves them

SHe has always said she had them for Michael, and that she got paid. BIG DEAL, didnt SJP and Matthew Broderick just have twins to a surrogate they paid?

If he offered me millions to have his kids and I didnt have to root him, I would've done it too.:thumbup

Now, MJ is dead, she wants her kids where they should be now, with their mum.

We know nothing of what has happened with her in the last few years, who;s to say she wont be a good mum

She's made a start by wanting to get them away from all the crap thats going on, and that weird family.
 
78,875Threads
2,185,392Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top