We appear to more liberal than the raving right (who is so wrong) residing in this forum. That's very true.. Lib/Con is all relative anyway. Ronald Reagan, the God of the Republican party, if he was alive and politically active would be attacked by your average Republican today, especially Tea Party types for not being conservative enough.
Once again proving how ridiculously out of touch and clueless you are. The largest Republican voting block around today are those that more than likely voted for Reagan in the first place. But hey, let's play this game... looks to be fun.
FDR, the god of the Democrat party, if he was alive and politically active today would be attacked by your average Democrat for not being liberal enough.
Hey, that was fun. I bet I could throw plenty of names in there.
The other thing that makes you clueless is that you see things in liberal/conservative. You're viewing things on a sliding scale, when it's two sliding scales that make up the scope of political views. I'm socially liberal and fiscally conservative. So what does that make me in your world? Apparently it make me a conservative, because you and Tim throw all of us with libertarian views or leanings in with the neocons. When it comes down to it though, we don't agree with that wing of political thinking, but it's closer to what we agree with than the big government, nanny state, spend spend spend that's the Democrats are all for.
There are plenty of us around here that don't like either major political party... but in your limited political view, we're all republicans because we don't agree with the Democrats. Meanwhile, I haven't seen you or Tim agree with a Republican on anything, and I don't think I've seen you take a Democrat to task on anything. Therefore, you look and act like a Democrat.... so despite your claims to the contrary, I have to believe that's what you are.