N Korea Conducts Nuclear Test

Users who are viewing this thread

KpAtch3s

Active Member
Messages
993
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z

N. Korea Conducts Powerful Nuclear Test, Reportedly Fires Short-Range Missiles

Monday , May 25, 2009
foxnews_story.gif



SEOUL, South Korea —
North Korea claimed it carried out a powerful underground nuclear test Monday — much larger than one conducted in 2006 — a major provocation in the escalating international standoff over its rogue nuclear and missile programs. The regime "successfully conducted one more underground nuclear test on May 25 as part of measures to bolster its nuclear deterrent for self-defense," the country's official Korean Central News Agency said.
Russia's Defense Ministry confirmed an atomic explosion at 9:54 a.m. (0054 GMT) in northeastern North Korea, estimating the blast's yield at 10 to 20 kilotons — comparable to the bombs that flattened Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Hours later, the regime test-fired three short-range, ground-to-air missiles, the Yonhap news agency reported, citing unnamed sources. U.N. Security Council resolutions bar North Korea from engaging in any ballistic missile-related activity.
President Barack Obama called the moves "blatant defiance" of the Security Council and a violation of international law that would only further isolate North Korea.
North Korea's claims "are a matter of grave concern to all nations," he said, calling for international action in a statement from Washington. "North Korea's attempts to develop nuclear weapons, as well as its ballistic missile program, constitute a threat to international peace and security."
The U.N. chief said Monday that if North Korea's claim can be confirmed, its announcement of a second nuclear test would represent "a clear violation" of a United Nations Security Council resolution.
"I sincerely hope that the Security Council will take necessary corresponding measures," U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told The Associated Press, declining to specify what further moves, or sanctions, he would urge the 15 council members to take.
The council scheduled emergency consultations on North Korea's actions for Monday afternoon.
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown condemned the test as "erroneous, misguided and a danger to the world."
Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso said the Security Council will meet at 4:30 p.m. Monday in New York.
"North Korea's nuclear test poses a grave challenge to nuclear nonproliferation and clearly violates U.N. Security Council resolutions," he said in Tokyo. "We are not tolerating this at all."
Even China, North Korea's traditional ally, issued rare criticism of Pyongyang, with the Foreign Ministry saying in a statement posted on its Web site that Beijing was "resolutely opposed" to the test.
North Korea's bold defiance raises the stakes in the standoff over its nuclear program. In the past two months, Pyongyang has launched a rocket despite international calls for restraint; abandoned international nuclear negotiations; restarted its nuclear plants; and warned it would carry out the atomic test as well as long-range missile tests.
The rise in tensions comes amid questions about who will succeed impoverished North Korea's authoritarian leader, 67-year-old Kim Jong Il, who is believed to have suffered a stroke last August. North Korea also has custody of two American journalists — accused of entering the country illegally and engaging in "hostile acts" — who are set to stand trial in Pyongyang on June 4.
"This is a political act more than a military act," said Jim Walsh, an international security expert at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Walsh said domestic factors related to North Korea's political transition were likely the main factor.
Monday's atomic test was conducted about 50 miles northwest of the northern city of Kilju, Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Alexander Drobyshevsky said, speaking on state-run Rossiya television.
Kilju, in the northeastern province of North Hamgyong, is where North Korea conducted its first nuclear test in October 2006 in a surprise move that also angered China and drew wide-ranging sanctions from the Security Council.
An emergency siren sounded in the Chinese border city of Yanji, 130 miles to the northwest. A receptionist at Yanji's International Hotel said she and several hotel guests felt the ground tremble.
North Korea boasted that Monday's test was conducted "on a new higher level in terms of its explosive power and technology of its control" than in 2006.
Pyongyang is believed to have enough weaponized plutonium for at least a half-dozen atomic bombs. However, experts say scientists have not yet mastered the miniaturization needed to mount a nuclear device onto a long-range missile.
Ten to 20 kilotons would be far more than North Korea managed in 2006. U.S. intelligence officials said the 2006 test measured less than a kiloton; 1 kiloton is equal to the force produced by 1,000 tons of TNT. However, Russia estimated the force of the 2006 blast at 5 to 15 kilotons, far higher than other estimates at the time.
Radiation levels in Russia's Primorye region, which shares a short border with North Korea, were normal Monday several hours after the blast, the state meteorological office said.
In Vladivostok, a city of 500,000 people about 85 miles from the Russian-North Korean border, translator Alexei Sergeyev said he wasn't concerned about the test and doesn't fear North Korea.
"Their nuclear program does not have military aims — their only aim is to frighten the U.S. and receive more humanitarian aid as a result," said Sergeyev.
The reported test-firing of short-range missiles took place at the Musudan-ri launchpad on North Korea's northeast coast, some 30 miles from the nuclear test site, Yonhap said. Unnamed sources described it as a ground-to-air missile with a range of 80 miles.
Japan's coast guard said Friday that North Korea warned ships to avoid waters off the coast near the launch site, suggesting Pyongyang was preparing for a missile test. Yonhap also reported brisk activity along the northeast coast last week.
South Korean troops were on high alert but there was no sign North Korean soldiers were massing along the heavily fortified border dividing the two nations, according to an official at the Joint Chiefs of Staff headquarters in Seoul. He spoke on condition of anonymity, citing agency policy.
The two Koreas technically remain at war because their three-year conflict ended in a truce, not a peace treaty, in 1953.
Tensions have been high since conservative President Lee Myung-bak took office in Seoul in February 2008 saying Pyongyang must fulfill its promises to dismantle its nuclear program before it can expect aid.
South Koreans, meanwhile, were grappling with the suicide two days earlier of Lee's liberal predecessor, Roh Moo-hyun, whose death elicited condolences from Kim Jong Il. Kim held a 2007 summit in Pyongyang with Roh, who championed reconciliation with North Korea.
North Korea had agreed in February 2007 to a six-nation pact to begin disabling its main nuclear reactor in exchange for 1 million tons of fuel oil and other concessions. But Pyongyang abruptly halted the process last summer over a dispute with Washington over how to verify its 18,000-page list of past atomic activities.
Talks hosted by Beijing in December failed to resolve the impasse, and North Korea abandoned the six-nation negotiations last month in anger over the U.N. condemnation of its rocket launch.
North Korea claims it launched the rocket to send a satellite into space; South Korea, Japan and other nations saw it as a way to test the technology used to launch an intercontinental ballistic missile, one capable of reaching the U.S.


N. Korea Conducts Powerful Nuclear Test, Reportedly Fires Short-Range Missiles - North Korea | Map | Government - FOXNews.com


 
  • 55
    Replies
  • 1K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Mystic

OTz's Typo Scouser
Messages
12,025
Reaction score
67
Tokenz
117.19z
...how would you deal with a country that is lead by insanity...war against them will only provoke them to do what we all don't want them to do.

a quiet assassination of all the top people there would be my guess as to how to handle this, but to be sure to put someone we own in leadership....
 

skyblue

KEEP THE FAITH
Messages
27,194
Reaction score
16
Tokenz
0.34z
...how would you deal with a country that is lead by insanity...war against them will only provoke them to do what we all don't want them to do.
a quiet assassination of all the top people there would be my guess as to how to handle this, but to be sure to put someone we own in leadership....

or would they're army just lay down they're guns and say 'give me MTV,playboy,macdonalds and jack daniels'?:ninja
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
Saddam Hussein was a joke compared to N.K. If you want to be scared now is the time. If diplomacy can't reign them it, it just might be a good time to blow their nuclear facilities to some place else... This country would be one of the worst to get intercontinental nuclear capabilities. I'm serious.
 

ssl

Banned
Messages
4,095
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
i say let them learn the responsibilities of having a nuclear arsenal. these types of weapons are not all fun and games; there are some serious shit involved with the storage and disposal of waste.

really, i think it has been shown that diplomatic prevention has failed.

move on to helping them.
 

Dana

In Memoriam - RIP
Messages
42,904
Reaction score
10
Tokenz
0.17z
...how would you deal with a country that is lead by insanity...war against them will only provoke them to do what we all don't want them to do.

a quiet assassination of all the top people there would be my guess as to how to handle this, but to be sure to put someone we own in leadership....
I'm with this
 

ssl

Banned
Messages
4,095
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
...how would you deal with a country that is lead by insanity...war against them will only provoke them to do what we all don't want them to do.

a quiet assassination of all the top people there would be my guess as to how to handle this, but to be sure to put someone we own in leadership....

good question. how will we deal with the United States?

besides that, let us ponder for a second upon the idea of a quiet assassination.

when will that NOT lead to war? never. Now, more than ever, such a move is not smart, nor will it even come close to providing a peaceful resolution.

it is part of any living thing's nature to seek out and destroy competition.
 

Dana

In Memoriam - RIP
Messages
42,904
Reaction score
10
Tokenz
0.17z
good question. how will we deal with the United States?

besides that, let us ponder for a second upon the idea of a quiet assassination.

when will that NOT lead to war? never. Now, more than ever, such a move is not smart, nor will it even come close to providing a peaceful resolution.

it is part of any living thing's nature to seek out and destroy competition.
How the fuck can you compare N. Korea to the U.S.? They're not even on the same level.
 

ssl

Banned
Messages
4,095
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
How the fuck can you compare N. Korea to the U.S.? They're not even on the same level.

They are, you just do not know it yet. :ninja


Seriously, it was a poor joke. The reality is that the United States is really worse off. You really do not hear about any terrorist activities occurring inside North Korea (or at least, I have not... but I do not watch/listen to news anymore, I think it is a conspiracy or something every time I read something politically-related)...

So, we can chalk up a negative on the US side.

Also, a negative for being in a badly managed war (from the top levels anyways)

-2 for US, 0 for NK

Also throw in the idea that we are hindering technology, not only at North Korea, but also ourselves. If we truly want to be "better than" North Korea, we would 'allow' a more controlled version of the Cold War again, thus driving technology even further, instead of restricting developments.

Who knows? North Korean scientists may have found some vital information our scientists have not. Maybe something more vital than anyone could imagine, but we would not learn of it, especially if we keep trying to stop their development efforts.

What if Great Britain was successful at stopping the early startings of the United States? Hell, we most likely would not have the type of technology we do have (computers) and the like, because GB would have held onto their stuff, enforcing it among all it's territories and the like, stemming any form of outside thought.

But since that did not happen, we have insane amounts of technology available; however, it seems to have stagnated recently; a small no-nuke conflict with North Korea may just be the thing we need.

At least, enough to drive humanity into one global community, instead of the petty arguing countries we have now.
 

KpAtch3s

Active Member
Messages
993
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
surely any military aggression towards N Korea might provoke them to launch a nuke?

what then?

we have missile defense systems if it really comes down to that. however a properly planned mission would destroy their ability to launch anything.

...how would you deal with a country that is lead by insanity...war against them will only provoke them to do what we all don't want them to do.

a quiet assassination of all the top people there would be my guess as to how to handle this, but to be sure to put someone we own in leadership....

I'm ok with assassination, only I think there is too many targets to really pull this off successfully.

Saddam Hussein was a joke compared to N.K. If you want to be scared now is the time. If diplomacy can't reign them it, it just might be a good time to blow their nuclear facilities to some place else... This country would be one of the worst to get intercontinental nuclear capabilities. I'm serious.

Hey, we might actually agree on something for once :D

i say let them learn the responsibilities of having a nuclear arsenal. these types of weapons are not all fun and games; there are some serious shit involved with the storage and disposal of waste.

really, i think it has been shown that diplomatic prevention has failed.

move on to helping them.

Do you think N Korea really gives a damn about storage and disposal of waste?


Another article I read said this test was 10 times stronger than the last test in 2006, registering a full one point higher on the Richter scale. I think we need to take out N Korea. Our military today is much more advanced than it was in the past. I do not think we would have the same problems as before.
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
North Korea is IMO playing games. Sure they would like to have the ability to nuke but I think they are trying to squeeze us for money. When we do as we normally do and cave in and give them what they want they will back down.

Time for some covert thinning of the herd over there. Let the CIA do what they do best.

But I would not think with Obama in charge I would hold out much hope for anything other than appeasement.
 

ssl

Banned
Messages
4,095
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Do you think N Korea really gives a damn about storage and disposal of waste?

Do you think North Korea is ready to blow itself up or become a nuclear wasteland because they do not know how to store and properly dispose of the nuclear crap?

Seriously, I think North Korea realizes the advantages of having people living inside of their borders; maybe not showing the socially accepted appreciation, but I do think North Korea understands its citizens value.
 

ssl

Banned
Messages
4,095
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
CIA has to have another expansion of the acronym than Central Intelligence Agency, if everyone keeps referencing the untold skills of their agents' ability at assassinations.
 
78,866Threads
2,185,216Messages
4,953Members
Back
Top