Men and their deteriorating moral and family values.

[Greatest I am]

It was not meant to. I do not promote drug abuse. That is your fixation, not mine.

I speak only to drug use.
That is because drug abuse is a medical condition. Doctors have decided that morally, it should be their problem.

Your moral remedy for a medical condition is jail. Mine is a doctor.

Who is more moral when alcohol and tobacco are dealt with by medicine while other, less adictive and harmful substances are dealt with with law?

Regards
DL

 

[Stone]

It was not meant to. I do not promote drug abuse. That is your fixation, not mine.

I speak only to drug use.
That is because drug abuse is a medical condition. Doctors have decided that morally, it should be their problem.

Your moral remedy for a medical condition is jail. Mine is a doctor.

Who is more moral when alcohol and tobacco are dealt with by medicine while other, less adictive and harmful substances are dealt with with law?

Regards
DL

It was not meant to. I do not promote drug abuse. That is your fixation, not mine.

There is no way to deny that your argument to legalize the sale and use of current illegal drugs is inclusive of the argument to legalize drug abuse of those illegal drugs.

I speak only to drug use.

Sophistry.......with out legalization of use there wouldn't be any legal abuse.

Your moral remedy for a medical condition is jail.

Nope.....I've been clear on medicinal use. I see no conflict with prescriptions for medicinal use.
And I'm the one, the only one in this forum, arguing for decriminalization of drug use/abuse...and you're well aware of it.
Face it, your logic has been all wonky.

Who is more moral when alcohol and tobacco are dealt with by medicine while other, less adictive and harmful substances are dealt with with law?

Quit stealing my position to fabricate a new image of yourself.
Your arguments have been against decriminalization .....and advocate prescriptions for the purpose of abuse because.....and you did post this.....it avoids the conflicts of mixing unknown illegal drugs. 'Safe abuse' through prescriptions

You might think of yourself as being slick in these debates, but I see you only as being a 'slick'......

 

[Stone]

So again......how do you rationalize legalizing drug abuse and at the same time being derogatory about the declining morality and family values in the US.....and Canada, since you live there?

 

[Stone]

New question

I notice you have posted a new thread in support of a secret society controlling mankind, or at least North America, here:
http://www.offtopicz.net/showthread...-unstoppable&p=2179621&viewfull=1#post2179621

In that post you state:

Should the Illuminati be stopped?
No. If they ever did disappear, we would invent a newIlluminati.

Why not stop them?
Because society would go to chaos and our socio economicdemographic pyramid would collapse. This collapse would only be for a short time.It would soon resume its natural and uncontrolled shape.

Should the Illuminati be given more power?
Yes. They could stabilize our common and bring a higher longterm profit and wealth for all.

Will we give them more power?
No. People fear what is already there and fear their ownpower to rule and control the economy. We are cowards and fear that we lack thewisdom and thus allow chaos to run our economy.

If you are wise, you will know that you can know who theIlluminati are and you will also know that you are helping them exist.

A supposed expert on the Illuminati
Coleman ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Coleman_(author) ) has a list of 21
goals of the Illuminati here:
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/johncolemangoalsofIlluminati.shtml


By what logic do you explain your support for the goals stated while at the same time decrying the results of those goals?

( are you brave enough to even try )