Leaving out ALL ethical issues stem cells vs. war on terror.

Users who are viewing this thread

Goat Whisperer

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I was wondering if you thought that we would save more lives by researching and using stem cells, or by ending the war on terror? Post any statistics or opinions, and/or simply say cells for stem cells being of more use or war for ending the war to be more useful.
 
  • 62
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Tim

Having way too much fun
Valued Contributor
Messages
13,518
Reaction score
43
Tokenz
111.11z
Vshayes "you can put the information in your sig" is what he wrote to me in a private message, so sorry the admin did say it was FINE.

Yes, having the link in your sig is fine.


I would think that it would save more lives stopping terrorist.

I only say this because researching stem cells won't save lives.... BUT, it we were to make significant advances in the field through this research and we were able to cure certain diseases, then I would change my answer.

I think research on the use of stem cells is VERY important. I think we can handle both.
 

Breath

Banned!
Messages
3,824
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
My apologies to you Peto. Sig away.
Not my thing to click Sig links though. Nor is your topic. I shall leave now.
 

Goat Whisperer

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Yes, having the link in your sig is fine.


I would think that it would save more lives stopping terrorist.

I only say this because researching stem cells won't save lives.... BUT, it we were to make significant advances in the field through this research and we were able to cure certain diseases, then I would change my answer.

I think research on the use of stem cells is VERY important. I think we can handle both.
Thanx for the opinion... I was just talking about the war and tha casualities and junk not about a terrorist killing 15'000 people. :) cuz terrorist can have something to do with the war on terror and the can not, just clarrifying...
 

Goat Whisperer

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
lol, I posted this on a different website and I got a ery good response check it out... "Funny thing Bush says no to this because he claims he's born again but then he starts wars to kill. The stem cells that are thrown out everyday should be used and utilized. It's a weird thing about people like Bush they claim to hate abortion but hoo rah for wars I can't figure these mental people out!"

Laura C.
 

Dekaf

New Member
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Yes forget my last thing, however now I think im about half and half on this subject. I think more likely that stopping the war will be better but if we utilize stem cells properly which has a chance of not happening, it will be very good.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
I was wondering if you thought that we would save more lives by researching and using stem cells, or by ending the war on terror? Post any statistics or opinions, and/or simply say cells for stem cells being of more use or war for ending the war to be more useful.
How about both?


The "war on terror" is just like "the war on drugs". Its unwindable and simply a buzzword to be said on FOX news.
 

Boomer

Nipples-O-Steel
Messages
15,168
Reaction score
7
Tokenz
0.01z
Too many noobs in one topic. I'm not sure how sincere this thread is. No offence, but we have been invaded quite a bit lately.
 

Goat Whisperer

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Too many noobs in one topic. I'm not sure how sincere this thread is. No offence, but we have been invaded quite a bit lately.

Is it a bad thing that more people are taking an interest in offtopicz? and also a noob is a person asking/begging for something, and a newb is someone new at something.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
You're right! 911 was nothing but sound bytes and one line slogans invented by FOX news. :smiley24:
what?


I don't believe the 9/11 conspiracy theories. But with the phrase "war on terror", media outlets like to use it to sell their message. Its called sensationalism. There can never be a real war on terror.
 

gLing

Active Member
Messages
4,972
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
what?


I don't believe the 9/11 conspiracy theories. But with the phrase "war on terror", media outlets like to use it to sell their message. Its called sensationalism. There can never be a real war on terror.
You are right, the fight is really against klingons. They after all attacked on 911 and not the mythical terrorists.
 
78,875Threads
2,185,391Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top