Is War on Terror Counter-productive??

[Stone]

there could be more than 60 terrorist orgs in Pak...I don't know..but this number is rising as the war continues...
this is what counter productiveness means..
If your war was successful terrorism would have been eliminated after 13 years of warring but no, on the contrary it is increasing...and you are making more and more enemies..
maybe some other countries might pick up in time and stand face to face against you...

Bush was an asshole.
Obama not any better.

But that doesn't turn you and your terrorist buddies into 'the good guys'.

One only has to look at how civilians are being treated in Iraq by ISIS to understand how evil your friends are, mazHur.
Your buddies are the war and their leaders seem intent on expanding this war in Iraq and the other war in Pak/Afg.

 

[Stone]

nonsense,,,you talk like a child. The main player in the game is the US..

No. The main players in the ME and Southeast Asia are terrorist organizations.
Al Qaeda and Pak started this whole damn mess with 9/11

 

[Stone]

Maz terrorism was on the rise before the war on terror started MAZ.....................................

Actually........
There was no such term being used as 'War on Terror' before 9/11.
9/11 was the beginning of what eventually became known as the war in terror.

 

[Stone]

Terror is real maz...whether you can touch it or not.
I mean if I high jacked some airliners..it didnt happen right as terror in as intangible word right.

mazHur is using terms he read elsewhere, that he doesn't understand.
It's about context and sophistry and mazHur's sophistry is pathetic.

 

[The Man]

Actually........
There was no such term being used as 'War on Terror' before 9/11.
9/11 was the beginning of what eventually became known as the war in terror.

Right..I was just explaining to him that terrorism itself was on the rise prior to the war on terror.
As he tries to discount all events that led up to the war

 

[mazHur]

No. The main players in the ME and Southeast Asia are terrorist organizations.
Al Qaeda and Pak started this whole damn mess with 9/11

Main player in the ME as well is America,,,,,
Now it is bending over to Iran,,.,
Why don't you leave the Iraqi's alone as it is their country not yours??
But,no, you are there for their Oil,..

 

[mazHur]

Right..I was just explaining to him that terrorism itself was on the rise prior to the war on terror.
As he tries to discount all events that led up to the war

No, it was not so rampant. America trained the terrorist or caused them to be trained to fight against the Ruskies...when the Ruskies were driven away by them America ditched them and let them loose...breaching out of its promises made to them..
Consequently they turned their guns against America..and you got hit in the neck.

Then Bush had a dream wherein God told him to wage a 'crusade' ...and it is going on for the last 13 years without success. On the contrary it has provided impetus to terrorism which is growing worldwide now due to YOUR follies.

In fact it's YOU who have created all the mess in the ME....and you will be held responsible to the consequences.

 

[mazHur]

mazHur is using terms he read elsewhere, that he doesn't understand.
It's about context and sophistry and mazHur's sophistry is pathetic.

It's clear that the word 'terror' has an abstract connotation....which means YOU have NO definite enemy...to fight against.

By simply saying you are for 'love' or 'hate' you cannot go kissing someone on the lips or the ass. can you or will you??

 

[mazHur]

Actually........
There was no such term being used as 'War on Terror' before 9/11.
9/11 was the beginning of what eventually became known as the war in terror.

You surely seem to live in a fool's paradise and are a superlative idiot..

Now bow down on your knees to Iran

The conflict in Iraq adds a new angle to the U.S.-Iran nuclear talks. The NYT's David Sanger, here.

 

[Stone]

It's clear that the word 'terror' has an abstract connotation....which means YOU have NO definite enemy...to fight against.

By simply saying you are for 'love' or 'hate' you cannot go kissing someone on the lips or the ass. can you or will you??

The context of 'terror' you have been using in not an abstract as I have already pointed out.
The war on terror is a war against those that inflict injuries and death ( terrors ).....physical considerations, not abstracts like love or hate.
The fear of terrorism is an abstract.


Idiot.

 

[Stone]

You surely seem to live in a fool's paradise and are a superlative idiot..

Now bow down on your knees to Iran

....................................

There was no such term being used as 'War on Terror' before 9/11.
9/11 was the beginning of what eventually became known as the war in terror.

 

[mazHur]

There was no such term being used as 'War on Terror' before 9/11.
9/11 was the beginning of what eventually became known as the war in terror.

So? you can coin a new one anytime you want/

Idiota, read this and drown in a swampy pool to save your face!

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-...s-died-from-us-uk-intervention_b_4536778.html

And more

"...economic sanctions, deployed frequently by powerful states rather than minor ones, may have caused more deaths in the post-Cold War era, than all weapons of mass destruction throughout history."

 

[Stone]

So? you can coin a new one anytime you want/

Idiota, read this and drown in a swampy pool to save your face!

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-...s-died-from-us-uk-intervention_b_4536778.html

And more

"...economic sanctions, deployed frequently by powerful states rather than minor ones, may have caused more deaths in the post-Cold War era, than all weapons of mass destruction throughout history."

There was no such term being used as 'War on Terror' before 9/11.
9/11 was the beginning of what eventually became known as the war on terror.

 

[mazHur]

There was no such term being used as 'War on Terror' before 9/11.
9/11 was the beginning of what eventually became known as the war in terror.

Your veterans say you are screwed!!
Veterans debate: Did U.S. leaders fail or did Iraqis?
Some blame civilian leaders for wasting gains, while others say the United States is powerless to fix Iraqi politics.

 

[Stone]

You veteran say you are screwed!!
Veterans debate: Did U.S. leaders fail or did Iraqis?
Some blame civilian leaders for wasting gains, while others say the United States is powerless to fix Iraqi politics.

There was no such term being used as 'War on Terror' before 9/11.
9/11 was the beginning of what eventually became known as the war in terror.

 

[mazHur]

There was no such term being used as 'War on Terror' before 9/11.
9/11 was the beginning of what eventually became known as the war in terror.

 

[Stone]

..............

I've often pictured you looking like that



But the fact remains:
There was no such term being used as 'War on Terror' before 9/11.
9/11 was the beginning of what eventually became known as the war on terror.

 

[mazHur]

I've often pictured you looking like that



But the fact remains:
There was no such term being used as 'War on Terror' before 9/11.
9/11 was the beginning of what eventually became known as the war on terror.

KKK terror appeared much before 9/11...
you were no t alive then, neither you are in your senses now, you cat face!!

 

[mazHur]

I've often pictured you looking like that



But the fact remains:
There was no such term being used as 'War on Terror' before 9/11.
9/11 was the beginning of what eventually became known as the war on terror.

Idiota, read this and drown in a swampy pool to save your face!

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-...s-died-from-us-uk-intervention_b_4536778.html

And more

"...economic sanctions, deployed frequently by powerful states rather than minor ones, may have caused more deaths in the post-Cold War era, than all weapons of mass destruction throughout history."

 

[mazHur]

There was no such term being used as 'War on Terror' before 9/11.
9/11 was the beginning of what eventually became known as the war in terror.

Hey, what are you doing, Sodom?