Is War on Terror Counter-productive??

Users who are viewing this thread

  • 301
    Replies
  • 6K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Stone

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
54
Tokenz
0.00z
What an American asshole you are!! I would like to kick it!

Another aspect of counter productiveness of war...
Oil markets are chill about terrorists and Iraq's oil production - it's the long term that's worrisome. FP's Keith Johnson: "The relentless march of Islamist militants south through Iraq is taking a toll on the country's oil infrastructure, forcing the closure of Iraq's largest oil refinery and sparking fears of an attack on Baghdad itself. But with Iraq's oil output, if not its national integrity, apparently still intact, global oil markets are treading water after pushing crude prices up to nine-month highs late last week.



What an American asshole you are!! I would like to kick it!

Tell us how you really feel :D



Another aspect of counter productiveness of war...
Oil markets are chill about terrorists and Iraq's oil production - it's the long term that's worrisome. FP's Keith Johnson: "The relentless march of Islamist militants south through Iraq is taking a toll on the country's oil infrastructure, forcing the closure of Iraq's largest oil refinery and sparking fears of an attack on Baghdad itself. But with Iraq's oil output, if not its national integrity, apparently still intact, global oil markets are treading water after pushing crude prices up to nine-month highs late last week.
Just noting.....you've been rooting for those terrorists......makes you one of Bush's 'evil doers' ....;)
 

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
Maz if the war on terror is counter productive ..then why did you guys shoot the terrorists at the airport?
Why is your own country currently considering waging war against the terrorists?
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Isnt it about time you guys stop sponsoring terrorists maz?
Now I am being serious...you guys need to get all your resources together and get very serious about killing these people maz.
With the millions upon millions of terrorist PK has it will take the joint effort of many nations to properly level pk terrorist areas.
Sure...half the population of PK supports terrorist so you will still have a problem.
You guys have created a mess for sure.
What ever made you guys think you could provide haven for terrorists and get "love" in return?
I suspect a narrow banded gene pool has a play in the thought process of the culture.


Nonsense.. Pakistan has a very long and porous border with its neighbor Afghanistan and it's beyond Pak to unilaterally guard it against intruders kicked out by Afghanistan into Pakistan.

Again when the NATO forces drone the people the innocent ones are again pushed into Pakistan by Afghanistan where their cousins live..Upon this the kinsmen of Afghans, the Chechans and the Uzbeks and some other 'freedom fighters' from Central Asia and even some Arabs ,Europeans and Americans join them ...

This is a very complex situation which even a super power like America has failed to overcome conjointly with other big powers of the world....
The war in nothing but a conflict of interest between the stake holders,,,viz Taliban or Al Quada and America.,..
Taliban or Quada are principally warring against America and no one else....and this should be food for thought for you, Uncle Man?

Pak has already lost more than 50000 of its men in your war,,,and is still fighting it...fist to fist. Whereas you are afraid to tackle them on ground,,air strikes seem to be all that you could do..you did it on Japan as well...I think Americans must catch the terrorists on ground and kill them...rather than bomb them and kill 20 innocent for one terrorist!
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Maz if the war on terror is counter productive ..then why did you guys shoot the terrorists at the airport?
Why is your own country currently considering waging war against the terrorists?


are you stupid?? Can't you see that terrorists have secretly infiltrated into Pak and it's for Pak to send them to hell.

Pak is suffering because of you...your bad policies starting from exploiting people to firstly fight against the Ruskies and now against Afghans and the ME.
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Maz if the war on terror is counter productive ..then why did you guys shoot the terrorists at the airport?
Why is your own country currently considering waging war against the terrorists?
Here is another bad news for you,....just think what you will do it Korea too begins to see you in the eye? Why don;t you attack them and uproot their program?


Hagel Chief of Staff Mark Lippert appeared before Senate Foreign Relations yesterday in his bid to be the next amby to the U.S. in Seoul. Yonhap News Agency's Lee Chi-dong for Global Post: "...Lippert... pledged Tuesday to work tirelessly to improve relations between the two countries, especially in efforts to denuclearize North Korea. At a Senate confirmation hearing, the nominee emphasized the "stark threat" North Korea poses to the U.S. and other parts of the world.


He cited Pyongyang's continued pursuit of nuclear weapons, advanced ballistic missiles, transfer of nuclear technology and egregious human rights violations against its own people.


"If confirmed, I will work closely with the leadership of the Republic of Korea to ensure we are fully aligned in our efforts to achieve the complete and verifiable denuclearization of North Korea and prevent proliferation of key technologies," he said at the start of the hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. More here.
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Tell us how you really feel :D




Just noting.....you've been rooting for those terrorists......makes you one of Bush's 'evil doers' ....;)


Another bad omen for you.,..China now!

Guess what? Turns out, China dominated a strategy discussion with the Navy yesterday at Newport that we mentioned yesterday. Not a big surprise. Defense News' Chris Cavas: "The latest international crisis may be a terrorist land offensive in Iraq, but concerns about China's ambitions clearly dominate those thinking about strategies for the Navy. 'The rise of China as a challenger is the most significant strategic challenge for the U.S.,' Hal Brands, a historian at Duke University, told a 'Current Strategy Forum' audience Tuesday at the Naval War College here. 'The U.S. is not devoting enough resources to addressing China's rise,' claimed Aaron Friedberg, a professor of international affairs at Princeton University. 'We need to develop a credible military strategy for countering China,' Friedberg continued. 'Our ability to come to the aid of our allies depends on having a plausible strategy in which our friends and allies believe.'"More here.
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
I said

Maz if the war on terror is counter productive ..then why did you guys shoot the terrorists at the airport?
Why is your own country currently considering waging war against the terrorists?
You said
are you stupid?? Can't you see that terrorists have secretly infiltrated into Pak and it's for Pak to send them to hell.

Pak is suffering because of you...your bad policies starting from exploiting people to firstly fight against the Ruskies and now against Afghans and the ME.

So Maz why is it not ok for us to cmobat terrorism ..why is it not counter productive when you do it?
Straight up question Maz
 

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
Pak is suffering because of you...your bad policies starting from exploiting people to firstly fight against the Ruskies and now against Afghans and the ME.
You have over 60 terrorist organization in PK maz...you have govt sponsored reservations for terrorists..that is the result of your policy.
Has nothing to do with the US maz.
As far as the Ruskies as you call them..we used people that were willing to fight them maz..we didnt create them.
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
I said


You said


So Maz why is it not ok for us to cmobat terrorism ..why is it not counter productive when you do it?
Straight up question Maz


you must have a 'good cause ' for fighting ...
'terror' is an abstract intangible word like
'rape, hate, love, prostitution, homosexuality, lust and greed, etc etc...all these have existed in one form or another in every place ..for instant KKK in the US...
Nobody has been ever successful in chasing a 'shadow' and 'capturing' it... You are doing the same in your warring pursuit..
no named enemy to fight against..

I told you the war is a hoax , a pretext to usurp resources of others by setting up you own puppet govts....and those you are fighting against know your intentions and they say they are fighting for their country..and in doing that 'all seems fair to them''.....

This is how your 'war' is rendered counterproductive...
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
You have over 60 terrorist organization in PK maz...you have govt sponsored reservations for terrorists..that is the result of your policy.
Has nothing to do with the US maz.
As far as the Ruskies as you call them..we used people that were willing to fight them maz..we didnt create them.


there could be more than 60 terrorist orgs in Pak...I don't know..but this number is rising as the war continues...
this is what counter productiveness means..
If your war was successful terrorism would have been eliminated after 13 years of warring but no, on the contrary it is increasing...and you are making more and more enemies..
maybe some other countries might pick up in time and stand face to face against you...
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
You have over 60 terrorist organization in PK maz...you have govt sponsored reservations for terrorists..that is the result of your policy.
Has nothing to do with the US maz.
As far as the Ruskies as you call them..we used people that were willing to fight them maz..we didnt create them.

nonsense,,,you talk like a child. The main player in the game is the US..
 

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
there could be more than 60 terrorist orgs in Pak...I don't know..but this number is rising as the war continues...
this is what counter productiveness means..
If your war was successful terrorism would have been eliminated after 13 years of warring but no, on the contrary it is increasing...and you are making more and more enemies..
maybe some other countries might pick up in time and stand face to face against you...
Maz terrorism was on the rise before the war on terror started MAZ.
Explain how killing terrorist is counter productive...dead terrorists are dead terrorist right maz.
They are terrorists right maz..you expected them to fight back right..nothing counter productive there.
With that logic..when you guys took out the terrorists at the airport..its counter productive ..right maz.
So why not just let the terrorists do what they want and kill who they want and everybody just stand by and take it...right maz.
because fighting them is counter productive right?
 

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
'rape, hate, love, prostitution, homosexuality, lust and greed, etc etc...all these have existed in one form or another in every place ..for instant KKK in the US
Ok...so there is no such thing then either as the kkk love hate etc..its abstract right..jsut as you say terror is not "real"
 

Stone

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
54
Tokenz
0.00z

Stone

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
54
Tokenz
0.00z
you must have a 'good cause ' for fighting ...
'terror' is an abstract intangible word like
'rape, hate, love, prostitution, homosexuality, lust and greed, etc etc...all these have existed in one form or another in every place ..for instant KKK in the US...
Nobody has been ever successful in chasing a 'shadow' and 'capturing' it... You are doing the same in your warring pursuit..
no named enemy to fight against..

I told you the war is a hoax , a pretext to usurp resources of others by setting up you own puppet govts....and those you are fighting against know your intentions and they say they are fighting for their country..and in doing that 'all seems fair to them''.....

This is how your 'war' is rendered counterproductive...


'terror' is an abstract intangible word
Depends on context.....actual terror is an event http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terror
The fear of terrorism would be an intangible abstract.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear


'terror' is an abstract intangible word like
'rape, hate, love, prostitution, homosexuality, lust and greed, etc etc...all these have existed in one form or another in every place .....
Do you know what an abstract is?
Abstract and concrete are classifications that denote whether a term describes an object with a physical referent or one with no physical referents.
Rape, prostitution and homosexuality definitely refer to physical considerations....that being sex.
Hate, love, lust and greed refer to emotions and are abstracts.

You are posting someone's comments not knowing what their words mean.


for instant KKK in the US..
That comment is really off the wall.
Quit smoking dope, it's killing your brain cells.



Fool.


I told you the war is a hoax
Which war are you referring to?

a pretext to usurp resources of others by setting up you own puppet govts....and those you are fighting against know your intentions and they say they are fighting for their country.
All I see is blather from a drooling fool.
The US did promote free elections in several nations but none of them seem very cooperative as if they are 'puppets'.
And all I read of your words is that of a terrorist sympathizer.

You hate the concept of democracy because it goes against your terrorist pals and you love democracy claiming terrorists are the good guys trying to bring true democracy to your nation.

mazHur......you just can't seem to keep all your lies in order.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top