In Need of an Enemy?

Innovation occurs from imagination. It grows from public buy-in. Do you think the Super Soaker water gun occurred from necessity? Necessity didn't bring forth the internal combustion engine, the internal combustion engine was around as a rich boy's toy until a capitalist found a way to make more money from it. The wheel was invented in South America. It never made it past the toy stage because necessity didn't have a use for it up in the Andes. They really could have used it in North America, but necessity never thought it proper to bring it about there.

I think people like Edison, Bell, Branson, Dyson, Gates, and Martin Cooper (inventor of the cell phone) might dispute your assertion that gov't is necessary for innovation.

You're actually going to pit China & Russia's post WW2 innovation against that of the West??

Firstly, crap like the super soaker isn't innovation, it's a pointless by-product of others innovation. Most innovation, if not all, from the market place has it's roots in research done at institutions like NASA. Where does Apple get it's glass for it's touch screen wonder? NASA research. Where does improved battery life come from? Research at NASA. New plastics? Research at NASA.

All of those inventors just found marketable uses for research, normally scientific, conducted by inquisitive individuals not after wealth but after understanding.

No of course, I'm not going to pit Chinese or USSR innovation above the west. But they had their moments.
 
This is not building a fictitious enemy. Illegal immigration is an actual problem.

you're right, it's an absolutely terrible problem in that it expands the economy, brings in taxes to the govt, supports local businesses, provides cheap labour in fields most aren't willing to work in... yeah, damn those illegal immigrants eh?

I can see why there's such an uproar about it.
 
Depends what way you look at it.

Conversely you could say, terrorism is the most efficient and deadly killer facing America, sort of like an assassin in a Robert Ludlum novel. While 50 million American's eat peanuts, and they only kill 0.0001 % approx of the population. Sort of like an Italian commando.
 
Depends what way you look at it.

Conversely you could say, terrorism is the most efficient and deadly killer facing America, sort of like an assassin in a Robert Ludlum novel. While 50 million American's eat peanuts, and they only kill 0.0001 % approx of the population. Sort of like an Italian commando.

not at all. apparently all Americans face the threat of terrorism.
 
So because terrorism has only killed 4080 people since 1950, we shouldn't be concerned about it? We should just sit back and let them do as they please? After all, its only 68 per year.

Why start at 1950 anyway? Obviously the geopolitics have changed completely since then. And what is the average worldwide in the last decade? Betcha its pretty damn high.
 
Back
Top