In Need of an Enemy?

[Peter Parka]

So in fact then, it dosen't cover just about everything and the founding father's wern't fortune tellers, is what you're telling me now.:24::24::24::surrender

 

[Codrus]

think whatever you like...twist whatever you want...doesn't matter,..you enjoy your countries freedoms and ill enjoy mine...more

 

[Minor Axis]

When it comes to threads on America, Pete's a troll.

I would not say that just because someone disagrees or they may be a tad prejudicial or disagreeable. Yes, Kelvin is blatant, but I think you guys owe Pete an apology.

 

[retro]

So I stand by my original assessment. If you have a child abroad, they are not a citizen of the US unless you follow the proper procedure. Until then, they are not a citizen of the US

You have to follow proper procedure when your child is born in the United States too... though hospitals have workers for that purpose that fill out the Social Security forms and all of that information and then submit it.

 

[Codrus]

I would not say that just because someone disagrees or they may be a tad prejudicial or disagreeable. Yes, Kelvin is blatant, but I think you guys owe Pete an apology.

:wtf:not that i know what im supposed to be apologizing for,...but im not apologizing for shit...especially shit that i have no idea what its for :crazy:

 

[retro]

I would not say that just because someone disagrees or they may be a tad prejudicial or disagreeable. Yes, Kelvin is blatant, but I think you guys owe Pete an apology.

Peter pretty regularly takes shots at the United States Constitution, especially the 2nd Amendment. I don't think that classifies him as a troll per se, certainly not in the realm of Kelvin.

 

[Minor Axis]

Peter pretty regularly takes shots at the United States Constitution, especially the 2nd Amendment. I don't think that classifies him as a troll per se, certainly not in the realm of Kelvin.

A good debate on the Constitution should always be welcomed, even shots. If they don't have merit, they are easy to knock down.

:wtf:not that i know what im supposed to be apologizing for,...but im not apologizing for shit...especially shit that i have no idea what its for :crazy:

Well you could reread my reply to Accountable. And maybe I should limit my remark to Accountable since he first said it, but based on this discussion, anyone who infers Pete is a troll because he is disagreeable should apologize imho. The troll label is serious and it is my opinion.

 

[Codrus]

A good debate on the Constitution should always be welcomed, even shots. If they don't have merit, they are easy to knock down.


Well you could reread my reply to Accountable. And maybe I should limit my remark to Accountable since he first said it, but based on this discussion, anyone who infers Pete is a troll because he is disagreeable should apologize imho. The troll label is serious and it is my opinion.

maybe you could go back and point out where i infered he was a troll..im pretty damn sure all i said was "i thought that was kelvins gig"..

 

[edgray]

not much chance of getting this thread back on track, is there?

 

[itsmeJonB]

I disagree

natural born citizenship is gud

 

[Minor Axis]

maybe you could go back and point out where i infered he was a troll..im pretty damn sure all i said was "i thought that was kelvins gig"..

Maybe you are right, I may have been reading between the lines as in, "Pete's a troll". "And I thought that was Kelvin's gig (but I'm not going to disagree with you)". And I've admitted that I could be in error. So you don't think Pete is a troll. Got it.

Edgray, back on track? Oh, The Republican's always need an enemy.

 

[retro]

not much chance of getting this thread back on track, is there?

This happens to almost every thread... debates have an ebb and flow to them, and sometimes it just goes a different direction than intended. I think the original topic has been pretty well covered at this point.

 

[edgray]

This happens to almost every thread... debates have an ebb and flow to them, and sometimes it just goes a different direction than intended. I think the original topic has been pretty well covered at this point.

I didn't think anyone had even really broached it. I'll just sit back and let you lot get on with it.

 

[itsmeJonB]

I didn't think anyone had even really broached it. I'll just sit back and let you lot get on with it.

the ones against it got their voice out. thats good enough for them

 

[edgray]

the ones against it got their voice out. thats good enough for them

It's ok, I'm just gonna watch the bed intruder song again.

 

[itsmeJonB]

It's ok, I'm just gonna watch the bed intruder song again.

run and tell that
run and tell that!

 

[edgray]

run and tell that
run and tell that!

homeboy
home home homeboy!

 

[Peter Parka]

Dont worry and just enjoy all those tokenz rolling in, Ed.:thumbup

 

[Accountable]

So I stand by my original assessment. If you have a child abroad, they are not a citizen of the US unless you follow the proper procedure. Until then, they are not a citizen of the US

You're technically wrong but the result is the same. Instead of applying for citizenship, which involves filling out papers, dealing with the consulate and paying fees; they're proving citizenship, which involves filling out papers, dealing with the consulate and paying fees.

They are citizens.

 

[Accountable]

I would not say that just because someone disagrees or they may be a tad prejudicial or disagreeable. Yes, Kelvin is blatant, but I think you guys owe Pete an apology.

Guys? Plural? I'm the only one that pointed out the fact. I don't apologize for fact.

What's your opinion regarding the subject of this thread?