how easy is it to get laid?

[SRC]

Obviously I can't speak for GP, but I doubt he was talking about morals. I imagine by saying "acting half way decent" he was meaning more in the line of not behaving like a Springer guest by swearing, shouting, or generally not behaving like a whack job whose never been in public before.

Then that is what he should have stated. What he stated implies a set of ground rules.

#1. They need to look halfway decent - meaning no fatties, uglies, or skanks

#2. They need to smell decent - meaning they need tos hower and maybe apply some fragance (Because no one wants to smell a dirty twat)

#2. They need to act halfway decent - meaning they should not be up on tables flashing their cooter and throwing beer everywhere while fighting in the bathroom with another girl, and it also implies that they act like a lady .. not a prositute.

It's always fun to go back and change what the rules might mean after someone proves them wrong though.

 

[BreakfastSurreal]

agreed SRC!!!

 

[TheOriginalJames]

Then that is what he should have stated. What he stated implies a set of ground rules.

#1. They need to look halfway decent - meaning no fatties, uglies, or skanks

#2. They need to smell decent - meaning they need tos hower and maybe apply some fragance (Because no one wants to smell a dirty twat)

#2. They need to act halfway decent - meaning they should not be up on tables flashing their cooter and throwing beer everywhere while fighting in the bathroom with another girl, and it also implies that they act like a lady .. not a prositute.

It's always fun to go back and change what the rules might mean after someone proves them wrong though.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but are those not your assumptions as to what his intent of meaning was?

The beauty of fat, ugly or 'skank' is in the eye of the beholder. Personally I'd rather not go home with a woman who's put a gallon of perfume on.

As far as the way they act, if they're more open to showing their tits, or they're just a let loose type of partier, they're going to be MUCH MUCH more fun to hang out with.

 

[SRC]

And yes, society doesn't usually hold "one night stands" very high on the regard list.

Would you want to seriously date a girl who has been having one night stands at the local bars for the last 10 years? I highly doubt it. Everyone in town would know what her twat tasted like.

He put the 'standard' out there to show that morality goes a long way, but you've still yet to prove that women who want it and go looking for it CAN'T get it.

The same can be said about men. It's all in WHO is doing the looking.

If some hot ass guy goes to a club and chats up a girl .. chances are he's gonna go home with her.
Same is true for some hot chik (usually getting hit on by the hot guy). But the hot chik usually isn't the one looking for it .. she just reconginzes that the guy is looking for it and decides at that moment that she'd like it too.

The under average girl (most times) is the one who really wants it .. and usually the one who isn't given a second look because all the guys are too busy looking at the hot chik wanting to bone her, knowing their under average looks won't let it happen. THAT is why guys don't get laid.

Normal everyday women and men have more problems geting BF/GF which means they have more problems getting laid.

Do you think any overweight person can just go get laid when they want? No.
How about someone with messed up teeth? No.

How about some person who really isn't all that attractive? No.

GP set rules for an average person, smelling averagely nice, with an average set of implied morals.

This average person he spoke of may or may not get laid .. depending on who they walk up and start talking to. My calculations based on societies standards leans towards:

average people getting laid = 50/50 chance

hot (both guys and girls included) people getting laid = 95% chance

If guys wouldn't try to step outside their ballpark and go for the hottest thing in the room everytime (which the average girls do notice .. and who don't want to be "second pick") they'd prolly get more action.

 

[Suzie]

I think peoples definition of "average" may be a little off.

 

[BreakfastSurreal]

if they're more open to showing their tits, or they're just a let loose type of partier, they're going to be MUCH MUCH more fun to hang out with.

wow that is the most horrible generalization I've ever heard!!!

 

[sexy.time]

yeah, and in GP's original post, i think he was trying to say, IN A VERY GENERAL SENSE, that womans chances of gettin laid are much higher than men if given the same amount of effort.

 

[AUDRAA]

I think peoples definition of "average" may be a little off.

and you can say this why?:confused

 

[TheOriginalJames]

wow that is the most horrible generalization I've ever heard!!!

At least it's not an over generalization.

I have female friends who had a hard time going to the beach in a two piece bathing suit, and would sit there all day like a lump on a log... with a tshirt on. Not much fun at all.

I've had female friends who would go out to concerts, prop themselves up for everyone to see in their bras.

But, you don't have to necessarily show your tits to be fun to hang out with. Is that better?

It was a generalization of that type vs the goody misspriss type which I always seem to come in contact with.

 

[groundpounder]

I think a post never made me blush this much, lol.

Ha ha. I do what I can. I'm just glad there's about 7,000 kilometers between us!

Maybe that's why you guys don't get laid, lol.

Maybe. We usually don't get laid because we suck at reading the signals you girls give us! and because we're dorks.

All my gfs and myself included go out to have fun and most of the times a guy hitting on us can get stressing.

Normally, most guys would not be stressed by a woman hitting on us. Hence, the thread....

Edit: this could be because I'm Basque (they say we are borning and everyone knows Basque men don't have sex more than once or twice a year )

:eek :wtf::wtf_anim: What in the name of creation are you talking about?!?! Wikipedia, here I come! YOU POOR WOMAN!!

 

[TheOriginalJames]

And yes, society doesn't usually hold "one night stands" very high on the regard list.

Would you want to seriously date a girl who has been having one night stands at the local bars for the last 10 years? I highly doubt it. Everyone in town would know what her twat tasted like.



The same can be said about men. It's all in WHO is doing the looking.

If some hot ass guy goes to a club and chats up a girl .. chances are he's gonna go home with her.
Same is true for some hot chik (usually getting hit on by the hot guy). But the hot chik usually isn't the one looking for it .. she just reconginzes that the guy is looking for it and decides at that moment that she'd like it too.

The under average girl (most times) is the one who really wants it .. and usually the one who isn't given a second look because all the guys are too busy looking at the hot chik wanting to bone her, knowing their under average looks won't let it happen. THAT is why guys don't get laid.

Normal everyday women and men have more problems geting BF/GF which means they have more problems getting laid.

Do you think any overweight person can just go get laid when they want? No.
How about someone with messed up teeth? No.

How about some person who really isn't all that attractive? No.

GP set rules for an average person, smelling averagely nice, with an average set of implied morals.

This average person he spoke of may or may not get laid .. depending on who they walk up and start talking to. My calculations based on societies standards leans towards:

average people getting laid = 50/50 chance

hot (both guys and girls included) people getting laid = 95% chance

If guys wouldn't try to step outside their ballpark and go for the hottest thing in the room everytime (which the average girls do notice .. and who don't want to be "second pick") they'd prolly get more action.

What is this the rule of averages suddenly? I know the point your trying to make but you're nitpicking at exact definitions to try to prove him wrong.

You walk up to me, ask me if I want to go home with you. I'd say yes.

That I can assure you is true.


I walk up to you, ask you if you want to go home with me. You'd say yes.

Am I correctly assuming your reaction will be what I have stated?

 

[TheOriginalJames]

damnit. lol Since I can't edit my last post;

I walk up to you, ask you if you want to go home with me. You'd say NO.

Am I correctly assuming your reaction will be what I have stated?

 

[AUDRAA]

yeah, and in GP's original post, i think he was trying to say, IN A VERY GENERAL SENSE, that womans chances of gettin laid are much higher than men if given the same amount of effort.

exactly ST. I think after much thought and discussion on this Jason may be right. Everyone pull yourself out of this and think generally for a second. We as women hold the cards for the most part correct? If a guy walks up to us in a bar we ultimatly have the choice to say yes or no as do they, but who by nature is the more horny looking to get laid in that situation its the guys. So yeah I gotta say if a woman is in a bar where there is a room full of men looking to get laid shes going to get some if shes looking. If shes not its not going to happen. So her odds are generally going to be better then her male counterparts at that point if we say a woman will have an easier time getting laid in a bar.

 

[groundpounder]

yeah, and in GP's original post, i think he was trying to say, IN A VERY GENERAL SENSE, that womans chances of gettin laid are much higher than men if given the same amount of effort.

fucking bingo, brah.

It's just in general terms that I was talking about. Now we're discussing the intracacies of the human condition, mating rituals, mysoginistic tendencies, social strata. :confused

All I meant to say is what you just said. WOW! Look what this thread hath wrought! :eek


Audra, I thought you'd never be turned. I can't believe it!
remember, everyone, general terms here. Every situation individually is going to be different. Just in general, women would have it easier if they wanted it...

 

[SRC]

What is this the rule of averages suddenly? I know the point your trying to make but you're nitpicking at exact definitions to try to prove him wrong.

That is what a debate is for, if you didn't realize. If you are trying to make a point you need to be able to make it. If you can't .. then your argument is insufficiently founded and therefore invalid.

You walk up to me, ask me if I want to go home with you. I'd say yes.
That I can assure you is true.

I walk up to you, ask you if you want to go home with me. You'd say no.
Am I correctly assuming your reaction will be what I have stated?

Of course I would say no, because I have a decently average set of morals.
Plus I would think it was a joke. When I found out you were actually serious .. I would think you as a person were a joke. I would think the same thing about anyone .. and I know many men that would agree with me (regardless of if they will actually own up to actually thinking it in public, meaning away from other men).

If you say yes to any random person who walks up to you .. you take yourself out of the average of normality because your moral standard of decency is lower than what is considered "normal" decency.

If a girl walks up to you and asks you (a complete stranger) point blank to go fuck .. she has problems. You also have problems if you would say yes.
You would be a fool to say yes, just based on social disease spreading for one. She is not an "average" female (or person for that matter). Which takes her out of the ranks of this debate.

Women who go out to get laid do so by flirting inside their parameters. Meaning they surf inside their safe zone, they don't saunter up to the hottest guy in the bar expecting to get him to buyher drinks, much less any action. We are more discrete about it if we are after it. But that discretion also leaves us open to not getting it "that night" .. it usually happens later, after a date.

Which is why our average for getting laid seems higher than men. We have patience to succeed.

 

[SRC]

So her odds are generally going to be better then her male counterparts at that point if we say a woman will have an easier time getting laid in a bar.

If she walks up to the right person, sure. Same with men.

I think there are several men posting in this thread right now that would laugh in your face (as a woman) if you were to walk up and proposition yourself to them.

Like I said 50/50 chance.

I'm glad to know most of my male friends would do the same.

 

[BreakfastSurreal]

average looking females:

below average looking:

 

[BreakfastSurreal]

I'm calling bullshit on your bullshit.

What I'm saying is, if YOU wanted to get laid you could. If ANY woman went out with the intent of getting laid, she's going to find a way to get laid. I'm not talking about going to the bar and waiting for a guy to come around (like most women do, but we won't get into that right now)...

Men ALWAYS have the intent of getting laid when they go out, but more often than not they don't.

I think this is more what we were arguing...your usage of absolutes. You were saying that if ANY woman went out and tried to get laid she could, and we were trying to prove you wrong..not your original point. You also said that men (generalizing, all men), ALWAYS have the intent of getting laid when they go out. Those were the points I had issues with, not your original question.

 

[AUDRAA]

If she walks up to the right person, sure. Same with men.

I think there are several men posting in this thread right now that would laugh in your face (as a woman) if you were to walk up and proposition yourself to them.

Like I said 50/50 chance.

I'm glad to know most of my male friends would do the same.

you are personalizing this to much again sweetie. Take you and your friends out of the equasion. Id never do this nor any of my friends, as would you, we are talking generalizations here can you see it then?

 

[BreakfastSurreal]

she didn't mean you as in YOU audra, she said you (as a woman) generalizing, not personalizing. I think she is right!