God sins a lot but is there no end to God’s greed?

Users who are viewing this thread

Greatest I am

Active Member
Messages
2,030
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.09z
God sins a lot but is there no end to God’s greed?

"Jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sado-masochistic, capriciously malevolent bully" - Richard Dawkins.


Dawkins has listed a few of the --qualities-- that he has gleaned from reading scriptures.

He seems to have forgotten God’s main sin though, that of greed and coveting.

God, in his greed, wants or more rightly said, demands, that we love, honor, and obey him and repent for sinning against him when in reality, man can only sins against man.
Any that dare not give all that he greedily covets is punished quite severely. This shows the depth of his greed. Scripture is surely on the mark when it says that he is a jealous God and God live up to this label quite well. Scripture also says that we are to try to be as perfect as God and that would mean having all the immoral attributes shown here.

Most, including the pope and other main line religions hierarchies believe in evolution. Evolution tells us that God, if he exists at all and that is not really a proven fact, would have lived may years before creating mankind. Most think that God is and always has been perfect and never changing.
In the beginning there would only have been God. No one or anything to be jealous of.
Nothing to covet, no one to control etc.

If Dawkins list has some accuracy in it and I am told by theists that it does, where did these attributes come from. They all seem so human that one would think that a God would be above such petty and immoral attributes.

One would think that a good God would only have good attributes but as we know, he cannot or will not follow his own commandments.

A human law maker is expected to follow the law and we see this as good morals yet theist follow a God who is acting less moral than men.

Strange.

How then did he suddenly become so jealous and greedy?

Even to the point of coveting another man’s woman, Mary.

Are there no commandments worthy of him following?

Are we to follow a law maker who does not follow his own laws?

Regards
DL
 
  • 78
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Niamh

Active Member
Messages
2,871
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
If Dawkins list has some accuracy in it and I am told by theists that it does, where did these attributes come from. They all seem so human that one would think that a God would be above such petty and immoral attributes.

They all seem so human because, in my opinion, God is a human made idea.
 

Carn

Member
Messages
191
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Seriously bro do you ever post anything else except for the god sucks stuff ?

God, in his greed, wants or more rightly said, demands, that we love, honor, and obey him and repent for sinning against him when in reality, man can only sins against man.
Any that dare not give all that he greedily covets is punished quite severely. This shows the depth of his greed. Scripture is surely on the mark when it says that he is a jealous God and God live up to this label quite well. Scripture also says that we are to try to be as perfect as God and that would mean having all the immoral attributes shown here.

I wouldn't call it demanding. If he really demanded anything from us he wouldn't give us free will to do our own biding, just left us as mindless puppets praising him. Also I never really bothered reading the bible but don't just the bad people go to hell the rest go to heaven (directly or through purgatory).
 

Defiant Tuesday

Active Member
Messages
786
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I wrote something on here that wasn't bad but realized that it was not worth it. And i'd rather not have my hind sight be 20/20. Think i will stay away from the religion section for awhile and debating with people i do not necessarily agree with. :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BornReady

Active Member
Messages
1,474
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Also I never really bothered reading the bible but don't just the bad people go to hell the rest go to heaven (directly or through purgatory).

That would make more sense than what many Christians teach. Many Christians think those who believe in Jesus go to heaven and the rest go to hell. Your actions aren't really important. It's all about belief. Many modern Christians have seen the folly in this but Fundamentalists are still clinging to tradition.

I emphasize that sending people to hell on the basis of their actions makes more sense than sending them there on the basis of their belief. But it doesn't make sense to send people to hell at all. Why create people only to torture them? I doubt anyone is so bad he can't be rehabilitated. But you don't rehabilitate someone with torture. And if he can't be rehabilitated then God should annihilate him, not torture him.
 

Niamh

Active Member
Messages
2,871
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
That would make more sense than what many Christians teach. Many Christians think those who believe in Jesus go to heaven and the rest go to hell. Your actions aren't really important. It's all about belief. Many modern Christians have seen the folly in this but Fundamentalists are still clinging to tradition.

I emphasize that sending people to hell on the basis of their actions makes more sense than sending them there on the basis of their belief. But it doesn't make sense to send people to hell at all. Why create people only to torture them? I doubt anyone is so bad he can't be rehabilitated. But you don't rehabilitate someone with torture. And if he can't be rehabilitated then God should annihilate him, not torture him.

It makes alot more sense but as I'm far as I'm concerned, the rule of if you believe in him and worship him was a man made idea by the church to control the masses
 

Tuffdisc

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,024
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
15.13z
Seriously bro do you ever post anything else except for the god sucks stuff ?



I wouldn't call it demanding. If he really demanded anything from us he wouldn't give us free will to do our own biding, just left us as mindless puppets praising him. Also I never really bothered reading the bible but don't just the bad people go to hell the rest go to heaven (directly or through purgatory).

He is jealous about in his words "God is fucking our women" :24:
There is nothing positive towards God, just negative, plus he posts on 20 different forums, tells me that he has no life.
 

Tuffdisc

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,024
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
15.13z
God sins a lot but is there no end to God’s greed?

"Jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sado-masochistic, capriciously malevolent bully" - Richard Dawkins.


Dawkins has listed a few of the --qualities-- that he has gleaned from reading scriptures.

He seems to have forgotten God’s main sin though, that of greed and coveting.

God, in his greed, wants or more rightly said, demands, that we love, honor, and obey him and repent for sinning against him when in reality, man can only sins against man.
Any that dare not give all that he greedily covets is punished quite severely. This shows the depth of his greed. Scripture is surely on the mark when it says that he is a jealous God and God live up to this label quite well. Scripture also says that we are to try to be as perfect as God and that would mean having all the immoral attributes shown here.

Most, including the pope and other main line religions hierarchies believe in evolution. Evolution tells us that God, if he exists at all and that is not really a proven fact, would have lived may years before creating mankind. Most think that God is and always has been perfect and never changing.
In the beginning there would only have been God. No one or anything to be jealous of.
Nothing to covet, no one to control etc.

If Dawkins list has some accuracy in it and I am told by theists that it does, where did these attributes come from. They all seem so human that one would think that a God would be above such petty and immoral attributes.

One would think that a good God would only have good attributes but as we know, he cannot or will not follow his own commandments.

A human law maker is expected to follow the law and we see this as good morals yet theist follow a God who is acting less moral than men.

Strange.

How then did he suddenly become so jealous and greedy?

Even to the point of coveting another man’s woman, Mary.

Are there no commandments worthy of him following?

Are we to follow a law maker who does not follow his own laws?

Regards
DL

God did not covet another man's wife, showing really how you can't seem to get things right. Mary was not attached (married) to anyone at the time of the immaculate conception
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
God sins a lot but is there no end to God’s greed?


Even to the point of coveting another man’s woman, Mary.
Regards
DL


This is highly offensive ...if not to God to billions who believe in Him.
Will the good mods take a note of that, please??
 

Niamh

Active Member
Messages
2,871
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
God did not covet another man's wife, showing really how you can't seem to get things right. Mary was not attached (married) to anyone at the time of the immaculate conception

so you believe the immaculate conception story then?
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
God did not covet another man's wife, showing really how you can't seem to get things right. Mary was not attached (married) to anyone at the time of the immaculate conception

I thought Mary was engaged to Joseph which back then in that culture was as good as being married.
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
If Dawkins list has some accuracy in it and I am told by theists that it does, where did these attributes come from. They all seem so human that one would think that a God would be above such petty and immoral attributes.

They all seem so human because, in my opinion, God is a human made idea.

I feel there is truth in this statement.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top