Do Cartoons Count As Child Porn?

[Goat Whisperer]

Yes they do.

Bart is 10, lisa is 8.

They are portrayed as minors on the show, and obviously the porn film.

quod erat demonstrandum, the Jury was right.

no their like 60 years old.

 

[The Joker]

Ah, they've been around for decades, but that does not change the fact that they are still being PORTRAYED as minors.

In a regular porn video, if a person is even slightly portrayed as a child, that is illegal.

In this, they are portrayed as children, as they have been for a long time, which makes it illegal.

 

[Accountable]

Ah, they've been around for decades, but that does not change the fact that they are still being PORTRAYED as minors.

In a regular porn video, if a person is even slightly portrayed as a child, that is illegal.

In this, they are portrayed as children, as they have been for a long time, which makes it illegal.

You mean like girls wearing school uniforms? :eek

 

[The Joker]

No because School girls can be over 18.

 

[NicAuf]

That judge is an idiot. Stupid fucking ruling. Yeah the cartoons might be sick and uncalled for, but its not fucking child porn, there are no REAL children depicted in it.

CHRIST FUCK!!!!

 

[Accountable]

No because School girls can be over 18.

And can be portrayed as younger!
*starts sorting through collection*

 

[The Joker]

That judge is an idiot. Stupid fucking ruling. Yeah the cartoons might be sick and uncalled for, but its not fucking child porn, there are no REAL children depicted in it.

CHRIST FUCK!!!!

Like I said, if there are characters in a porn film that are portrayed as underage, it is illegal.

The Jury was COMPLETELY, ONE HUNDRED PERCENT correct.

EDIT: The judge isn't an idiot, the JURY decides Guilty or Not Guilty, get your facts straight.

 

[SgtSpike]

It's kind of a hard issue, because cartoon characters are kind of silly, but there are also more realistic (but still not real) depictions of people. So where would you draw the line? Only when they're real people? Only when they're not realistic enough to be mistaken for real people?

 

[Natasha]

I could see if they were cartoons made to look like somebody REAL...but I just disagree w/ the ruling here. I just do not agree that fictional characters can be violated. *shrugs*

 

[Zorak]

Yes, it is the same.

Except for the part where you have sex with real children.

That's not quite the same.

 

[Mase]

Hell, let's say that cartoon porn in general shouldn't be classified as porn. Obviously they're just fictional drawings, and it isn't real, so I see no reason why it should be considered as porn. In fact, since it isn't real, I'd say it's appropriate for all ages, including children. :smiley24:

 

[Goat Whisperer]

Well, who is hurt because of it? Obviosly the cartoons aren't pressing charges, unlike a five year old that was froced to strip before a camera, no one was hurt. Why do we even care what sicko's are doing, its better for them to download cartoons then real children.

 

[wednesday]

I dont think it should be classified as child porn...but its still fooking sick to sit n watch kid cartoons get it off...so the man should just be named n shamed as a freak of nature...

 

[Mase]

I'd still find people wanking at drawings of 4 year olds sick. Maybe not as sick as wanking at real 4 year olds, but if they're generally wanking at somethiong that looks like a 4 year old regardless of it being real, I'd still see them as a paedophile.

 

[Peter Parka]

Who said anything about this guy wanking over cartoon pictures? I've had them sent to me before, the're jokes, not to everyones taste but still jokes. Not once did I get the impression the person who sent them to me was a paedo or wanking over them.

 

[Mase]

I'm not referring to the article you posted. Some people actually do wank at them, peter.

 

[Peter Parka]

Some people wank over feet. Dosent mean they should be banned from the internet.

*The feet that is, the people wanking over them is debateable, lol!*

 

[Mase]

And some people wank at non-pornographic pictures of 4 year olds, too.

How does feet compare to children?

 

[Peter Parka]

And some people wank at non-pornographic pictures of 4 year olds, too.

How does feet compare to children?

I never was talking about children, I was talking about cartoons but yeah, same thing applies, if a photo of a 4 year old isnt pornographic and on the internet, dosent mean people should get done for it just because there's some weirdos about.

 

[The Joker]

it's not ABOUT whether the Cartoon Children are violated, that is COMPLETELY irrelevant.

It is ILLEGAL to View or create porn with characters portrayed as minors. Animated, Real, Fictional.