Do Cartoons Count As Child Porn?

Ah, they've been around for decades, but that does not change the fact that they are still being PORTRAYED as minors.

In a regular porn video, if a person is even slightly portrayed as a child, that is illegal.

In this, they are portrayed as children, as they have been for a long time, which makes it illegal.
 
Ah, they've been around for decades, but that does not change the fact that they are still being PORTRAYED as minors.

In a regular porn video, if a person is even slightly portrayed as a child, that is illegal.

In this, they are portrayed as children, as they have been for a long time, which makes it illegal.
You mean like girls wearing school uniforms? :eek
 
That judge is an idiot. Stupid fucking ruling. Yeah the cartoons might be sick and uncalled for, but its not fucking child porn, there are no REAL children depicted in it.

CHRIST FUCK!!!!

Like I said, if there are characters in a porn film that are portrayed as underage, it is illegal.

The Jury was COMPLETELY, ONE HUNDRED PERCENT correct.

EDIT: The judge isn't an idiot, the JURY decides Guilty or Not Guilty, get your facts straight.
 
It's kind of a hard issue, because cartoon characters are kind of silly, but there are also more realistic (but still not real) depictions of people. So where would you draw the line? Only when they're real people? Only when they're not realistic enough to be mistaken for real people?
 
Hell, let's say that cartoon porn in general shouldn't be classified as porn. Obviously they're just fictional drawings, and it isn't real, so I see no reason why it should be considered as porn. In fact, since it isn't real, I'd say it's appropriate for all ages, including children. :smiley24:
 
Well, who is hurt because of it? Obviosly the cartoons aren't pressing charges, unlike a five year old that was froced to strip before a camera, no one was hurt. Why do we even care what sicko's are doing, its better for them to download cartoons then real children.
 
I'd still find people wanking at drawings of 4 year olds sick. Maybe not as sick as wanking at real 4 year olds, but if they're generally wanking at somethiong that looks like a 4 year old regardless of it being real, I'd still see them as a paedophile.
 
Who said anything about this guy wanking over cartoon pictures? I've had them sent to me before, the're jokes, not to everyones taste but still jokes. Not once did I get the impression the person who sent them to me was a paedo or wanking over them.
 
And some people wank at non-pornographic pictures of 4 year olds, too.

How does feet compare to children?


I never was talking about children, I was talking about cartoons but yeah, same thing applies, if a photo of a 4 year old isnt pornographic and on the internet, dosent mean people should get done for it just because there's some weirdos about.
 
Back
Top