Did You Serve ?

[Stone]

So why dont you just point to the posts to support your claim
or are you a punk

That's already been done by me, fool.

 

[Stone]

I dont associate with punks

While you haven't built your credibility back up...you did gain a little respect for starting to show a little honestly

 

[robdawg1]

Paste up my post where I condone torture as per claim.

how many times TM....i have aqlready posted...look back at pages 18 - 20///

 

[The Man]

Boring.......I made the claim and you admitted to it some 15 pages ago in your own words.
Bush orchestrated legal usage and you have argued it's usage.
You condone using torture.

Where have I condoned torture

 

[Stone]

OK TM....that seems to me like a pretty strong argument for water boarding, which is by humanitarian definition , torture. It is a violation of the Geneva Convention, and that is why they wouldn't do it on US soil....


TM, you are starting to get a little hostile, as though you are not capable of rationally debating. You call names and throw accusations....seems as though you are having a bit of trouble keeping it together....you ok?

Trust me, I've seen him a lot less lucid......

 

[The Man]

how many times TM....i have aqlready posted...look back at pages 18 - 20///

I cant find it...I do not have a post where I condone torture

 

[Stone]

Let me guess...still being dishonest rob

Here is my position which has been stated several times




Is there something about that you do not understand?

 

[Natasha]

did you read it all?

Didn't have to. I read 3 posts...everything else seems to be repeating those 3 posts. Same could be said for pretty much any debate thread.

"You said _______________!"
"I did not, learn to read!"
"YOU learn to read."

Rinse, lather, repeat.

 

[Stone]

......................I will not condemn those that legally boarded those three at the time....to do is chickenshit as they were looking out for the welfare of the united states.

.........................

You did post this did you not?

fuck you Stone

.

 

[robdawg1]

Originally Posted by The Man
Bitching and moaning to me about 3 guys getting boarded changes nothing...I will not condemn those that legally boarded those three at the time....to do is chickenshit as they were looking out for the welfare of the united states.

Write your congressman if you dont like the way the law was written then...if you are lucky you may get a response back "what do you want us to do about it now"

Let it go man...let it go.

Originally Posted by The Man
The water boarding was done under bush policy.
It was legal at the time...therefore there was no argument to legalize torture.
Bush was already gone.

Several hundred detainees at gitmo..3 were boarded that uncovered information to another planned attack.
I have no problem with rational nations...I do have problems with radicals.
Drone em snipe em bomb em...I just dont give a shit...whether the fruitcake is in a parking lot or watching tv..I just dont care.

The option is to set back and do nothing....remember stone this is not conventional...they hide and mix among the population which is what makes it so difficult.
Its not meet on a hill and have at it...if that were the case we could stomp em rather fast.
AQ and the Taliban are not concentrated to one location...And the host nations just havent made any progress on elimination stone ...so either the effort isnt there or they are not capable.
A mix of both actually.



DONE AND DONE!!

 

[robdawg1]

I cant find it...I do not have a post where I condone torture

There you go, Stone and I both posted where you posted condoning torture....black and white, plain as day....

 

[The Man]

Didn't have to. I read 3 posts...everything else seems to be repeating those 3 posts. Same could be said for pretty much any debate thread.

"You said _______________!"
"I did not, learn to read!"
"YOU learn to read."

Rinse, lather, repeat.

The posts that dont pop are posts to support that I condone torture.
The accusations are plenty.
They did slow awhile while tim and stone were on the honeymoon.

 

[robdawg1]

Didn't have to. I read 3 posts...everything else seems to be repeating those 3 posts. Same could be said for pretty much any debate thread.

"You said _______________!"
"I did not, learn to read!"
"YOU learn to read."

Rinse, lather, repeat.

good, cause i was about to say, you rspent all that time reading the garbage...whose ass is a nine now?

 

[Natasha]

good, cause i was about to say, you rspent all that time reading the garbage...whose ass is a nine now?

My ass is a 10...but what's that got to do w/ it??? :tooth

 

[Stone]

..............

"While it legally may have not been torture at the time....it needs to be illegal now."


.........................

It's obvious you've lost credibility on the above because of conflicting statements.

 

[Stone]

Then take it up with your congressman.
My position is below



Now if it was already illegal then it needs to stay illegal.
Let me guess..that will also be to difficult for you to understand.

Having trouble denouncing torture, are you?

 

[The Man]

There you go, Stone and I both posted where you posted condoning torture....black and white, plain as day....

Doesnt show I condone it {support it}
I merely explained what happened..
I didnt say I supported it.
I dont support the death penalty ...do you want to to condemn the guy that gives the juice?

 

[Stone]

where
Do you know the definition of condone..I have posted that in here as well

Boring..............

 

[The Man]

It's obvious you've lost credibility on the above because of conflicting statements.

No conflicting statements
If it was legal...now needs to be illegal.
If it was already illegal..then needs to stay that way.
Thanks for pasting my post and supporting my position.

As we can see I no way condone it.
You guys really should switch drugs

 

[The Man]

good, cause i was about to say, you rspent all that time reading the garbage...whose ass is a nine now?

Rob....its not all garbage...just the posts that claim I condone torture.....alot of garbage yes.
My posts are quality however