Did man land on the moon?

[Goat Whisperer]

...sus?

 

[Pudding Time]

Go look at those links that one person put up pretty much destroys all the "Evidence" in the video.

ahhhhh, no sorry they don't destory anything.. Apart from that Phil Plait guy destorying his own credibility.

 

[Pudding Time]

...sus?

suspicious.

 

[debbie t]

YouTube - UN-DEBUNKABLE MOON HOAX PROOF. Apollo's Atmospheric Moon

 

[Goat Whisperer]

ahhhhh, no sorry they don't destory anything.. Apart from that Phil Plait guy destorying his own credibility.

I still can't belive people think that the moon landing was faked... o well, go ahead it's not going to do anything to me if you think it's a hoax, I truly do not care.

 

[debbie t]

YouTube - Someone else on the Moon?

 

[skyblue]

It was only the US, and Russia.. The UK nor any other country was in that race.


And the only reason you won was because of German scientists...

ummmmmmmm......all the german scientists went american after WW11

 

[debbie t]

Well then the UK must of had a bet or something on Russia....


And we still won! :woot:

thats the phrase isnt it WE won ,the US won nothing but a huge propaganda coup against the then enemy the soviet union.your government lied to you and to the world to control the world ,why go in the first place ..for minerals ?you cannot determione if there are any useful minerals there by simply landing and making some cheesy home movies ..and thats what they are

 

[All Else Failed]

debbie read my links

 

[Pudding Time]

ummmmmmmm......all the german scientists went american after WW11

Exactly.. Operation Paperclip.

 

[All Else Failed]

Pudding the lander had a throttle. You know how they can use short bursts of fuel to soften the landing? They used a simple throttle for that purpose.

 

[Pudding Time]

Pudding the lander had a throttle. You know how they can use short bursts of fuel to soften the landing? They used a simple throttle for that purpose.

I know. But that's still means bursts of full power. With rockets it's either full power or no power. Yes they can turn it on and off, but each time they turn it on 10,000lbs of thrust is generated. There is no in between.

Come on man! This isn't rocket science!...... oh wait!...

 

[Goat Whisperer]

thats the phrase isnt it WE won ,the US won nothing but a huge propaganda coup against the then enemy the soviet union.your government lied to you and to the world to control the world ,why go in the first place ..for minerals ?you cannot determione if there are any useful minerals there by simply landing and making some cheesy home movies ..and thats what they are

Ur just mad cuz you lost the bet...

 

[livvy7678]

YouTube - Yolanda Adame - I Believe (honey ST)

That man did land on the moon!

 

[COOL_BREEZE2]

all of your conspiracies are answered in these links, not that it will convince conspiracy theorists.

Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy: Bad TV
The Moon Landings Were NOT Faked

I've just gone through the link "The Moon Landings Were NOT Faked" and from what I've seen Jim Scotty (a Planetary Scientist at the University of Arizona's Lunar and Planetary Laboratory) has debunked the college kid (Kevin Overstreet) theories in his (Overstreet's) attempt to disprove the moon landing at all costs.

Some interesting quotes:
Kevin Overstreet: "One thing that I would like to call to attention, is that I am not an expert on anything that is written in this report. I don't know much about camera's, or non-atmospheric conditions, or physics or anything".

Jim Scotty: "I am glad that Mr. Overstreet admits this up front. As we examine the evidence he presents, it will be clear that he needs to become at least familiar with some of these topics if he does not want to be misled by the very arguments he uses".

Kevin Overstreet: "I am just a senior in high school, and about the only thing that I know professionally is how to run movie projectors. I challenge all that read this page to find something wrong with it, and tell me about it, so I can more accurately disprove one of the most historical events of the century..... The Landing on the Moon.

"I challenge all that read this page to find something wrong with it, and tell me about it, so I can more accurately disprove (emphasis mine) one of the most historical events of the century...."

Jim Scotty: "Mr. Overstreet has set out to disprove the Apollo lunar landings at all cost, regardless of the evidence we may present to him. He implies here that he is prepared to counter any evidence the would be de-bunker can provide. His goal is clear and transcends the facts. Disprove at all cost. It is with this cloud of close-mindedness hanging over the subject that I set forth to show to the doubtful reader that the evidence provided by the "the Moon landings were faked" crowd (from here on the TMLWF crowd) and Mr. Overstreet in particular do not stand up to scrutiny".

 

[Carthage]

I believe that man is fully capable of landing on the moon, and it does not surprise me at all that we did. And I believe that our government would never lie to us like that.

 

[All Else Failed]

I know. But that's still means bursts of full power. With rockets it's either full power or no power. Yes they can turn it on and off, but each time they turn it on 10,000lbs of thrust is generated. There is no in between.

Come on man! This isn't rocket science!...... oh wait!...

No...you can moderate the amount of thrust.

 

[livvy7678]

You are all paranoid conspiracy theorists ...





































































(bigggggg words!!!)

 

[Hexidecimal]

No wonder I don't come here often anymore.

cheerio then

 

[Hexidecimal]

great stuff peeps,

now about the earth being flat.....