Did man land on the moon?

Users who are viewing this thread

  • 232
    Replies
  • 5K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

groundpounder

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,933
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I'm curious as to which line of conspiracy the theorists in this thread adhere to:

The 'new kids on the block' that seem to lack such basic understanding and knowledge of science, therefore becoming easy 'prey' for the jackals who want to sell books.

OR

Aliens have bases on the Moon. The Government knows this, of course, but cannot allow this information to get out, because they've been hiding the truth about ETs and contact with them since the 1940s, at least.

So, which?
 

groundpounder

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,933
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I really don't know what to make of it. I like to believe we did land on the moon, yet it could be plausible that it was faked.
I think like any conspiracy theory you're going to have those who believe one or the other in spite of evidence to the contrary.

The one fly in the ointment for me is the Van Allen belts. Jim Van Allen was a client of mine, and he and I spoke about this to some degree. Plus, he disputed the moon radiation bit.

He was sure we went.
 

COOL_BREEZE2

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,337
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Originally posted at AboveTopSecret

There is an area of very high radiation called the Van Allen Belt 272 miles from Earth which the Russians could never pass. In fact in 1959 Bill Kaysing reported on a Russian study which discovered that the amount of radiation on the moon would require astronauts to be clothed in 4 feet of lead in order to avoid instant death.

What I find is amusing is this quote from this so called AboveTopSecret site.
Someone making a theory in 1959 (forty years ago) to be considered serious or fact with the limited technology available at the time to determine that.
 

debbie t

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,888
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
After reading the last page I seriously want to hang myself.

why?
is it because we in europe know that the evil empire tells lies to the world and holds it by the short and curlies .if it happened ,which it didnt ,do you not think that 40 years on with so much more in the way of technological know how ,it wouldnt have happened again?
it hasnt happened again because it never happened in the first place .
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
why?
is it because we in europe know that the evil empire tells lies to the world and holds it by the short and curlies .if it happened ,which it didnt ,do you not think that 40 years on with so much more in the way of technological know how ,it wouldnt have happened again?
it hasnt happened again because it never happened in the first place .
because you're buying ridiculous conspiracy theories.


It hasn't happened again because there's no use for the moon as of now.
 

Goat Whisperer

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
why?
is it because we in europe know that the evil empire tells lies to the world and holds it by the short and curlies .if it happened ,which it didnt ,do you not think that 40 years on with so much more in the way of technological know how ,it wouldnt have happened again?
it hasnt happened again because it never happened in the first place .

Just because we were all in a international competition to get to the moon first, and we won, doesn't mean you can make up conspiracies :p
 

Pudding Time

Banned
Messages
2,933
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Just because we were all in a international competition to get to the moon first, and we won, doesn't mean you can make up conspiracies :p

It was only the US, and Russia.. The UK nor any other country was in that race.


And the only reason you won was because of German scientists...
 

Pudding Time

Banned
Messages
2,933
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
all of your conspiracies are answered in these links, not that it will convince conspiracy theorists.

Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy: Bad TV
The Moon Landings Were NOT Faked


I like this part:

Phil Plait said:
When someone driving a car pulls into a parking spot, do they do it at 100 kilometers per hour? Of course not. They slow down first, easing off the accelerator. The astronauts did the same thing. Sure, the rocket on the lander was capable of 10,000 pounds of thrust, but they had a throttle. They fired the rocket hard to deorbit and slow enough to land on the Moon, but they didn't need to thrust that hard as they approached the lunar surface; they throttled down to about 3000 pounds of thrust.

Rockets don't have throttles. It's either full power or no power. NASA is still currently working on variable acceleration rocket technology. And they are working on it solely for smooth landings on planets. If they were able to land smoothly on the moon almost 50 years ago, why are they now in development of this technology?
 
78,875Threads
2,185,391Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top